Google
 
Web NASIOC.com

View Full Version : More J.D. Power Nonsense


SoDealer
06-08-2006, 02:38 PM
http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.asp?ID=2006082

http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/charts/2006082a.gif

J.D. Power and Associates Reports:
Redesigned Initial Quality Study Shows That Vehicle Design Plays
As Critical a Role in Consumer Perceptions of Quality as Defects and Malfunctions

Lexus and Toyota Together Capture 11 of 19 Initial Quality Model Awards

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif.: 7 June 2006 — The way in which technology is integrated into new-vehicle design, particularly interior features and controls, is considered by consumers to be as important to quality as are defects and malfunctions, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2006 Initial Quality StudySM (IQS) released today. The study is in its 20th year.

The Initial Quality Study, which serves as the industry benchmark for new-vehicle quality measured at 90 days of ownership, has been completely redesigned for 2006 to capture problems experienced by owners in two distinct categories—quality of design and quality of production (defects and malfunctions).

“New vehicles today are often packed with new technologies that unfortunately can be complicated and frustrating for the average consumer when their integration is not well executed,” said Joe Ivers, executive director of quality and customer satisfaction research for J.D. Power and Associates. “In the eyes of consumers, design flaws can have as much of an impact on their perceptions of quality as can a defect. Yet, many manufacturers have tended to address quality solely on the plant floor without considering design factors.”

Based on both design quality and production quality considerations, the study finds that automakers can vary widely in their performance on these two components. Brands with the fewest defects and malfunctions include BMW, Chrysler, Hyundai, Lexus, Porsche and Toyota. Brands with the fewest design problems include GMC, Hyundai, Jaguar, Lexus, Nissan and Porsche.

“Without considering both quality factors, one might fail to recognize vehicles that are, in fact, excellent in certain ways,” said Ivers. “For example, BMW vehicles have among the fewest defects and malfunctions, along with Toyota. But BMW approaches controls and displays in a way that creates some problems for customers, leading to more design-related problems overall than Toyota incurs. Automakers differ significantly in how they define quality and what parts of the organization they hold accountable for it. Clearing both critical quality hurdles is an accomplishment experienced by only a limited number of brands.”

2006 IQS Ranking Highlights

Lexus and Toyota models continue to dominate initial quality rankings, capturing 11 out of 19 segment awards in 2006. Lexus models rank highest in every segment in which they compete. In addition, the LS 430 ties the Porsche Cayman for having the fewest quality problems in the industry. Other top-ranking Lexus models include: IS 250/IS 350, ES 330, SC 430, GX 470 and LX 470.

Toyota remains a quality benchmark, capturing five model-level awards—for the Corolla, Solara, Camry, Highlander and Sequoia—more than any other non-luxury brand.

Porsche and Lexus lead the luxury brands, while Hyundai, Toyota and Honda set the pace among non-luxury brands. Averaging just 91 problems per 100 (PP100) vehicles, Porsche tops the overall nameplate rankings. Porsche’s success can be partly attributed to the all-new Cayman, which tops the compact premium sporty car segment. Porsche is followed in the rankings by Lexus, Hyundai, Toyota and Jaguar, respectively.

Hyundai ranks among the top three nameplates in the study for the first time in the history of IQS. Highlights include a top ranking for the Hyundai Tucson in the compact multi-activity vehicle (MAV) segment, and top-three segment performances for the redesigned Sonata and all-new Azera, as well as the Elantra and Tiburon.

Honda also maintains its position as a quality leader. Although Honda does not receive any awards outright, five Honda models rank among the top three of their respective segments.

Other nameplates receiving model awards in 2006 include Chevrolet, Chrysler, Ford, Kia, Mazda, Pontiac and Suzuki.

Assembly Plant Awards

Toyota receives a total of four assembly plant quality awards for producing vehicles yielding the fewest defects, including the Platinum Plant Quality Award for its Iwate, Japan, plant, producer of the Lexus ES 330. The Iwate plant averages just 32 PP100. Plant awards are based solely on scores for defects.

Among North and South American plants, the General Motors Oshawa #2 plant in Ontario, Canada, which produces the Buick LaCrosse and Pontiac Grand Prix, receives the Gold Plant Quality Award for a second consecutive year. Toyota’s Georgetown, Ky., plant, which produces the Avalon, Camry and Solara Coupe/Convertible, and DaimlerChrysler’s Windsor, Ontario, Canada plant, which produces the Pacifica, Town & Country, Caravan and Grand Caravan, tie for the Silver Plant Quality Award.

In the Asia Pacific region, Toyota’s Higashi-Fuji, Japan, plant, which produces the Lexus SC 430, receives the Silver Plant Quality Award. Toyota’s Kyushu, Japan, plant, which produces the Lexus IS 250/IS 350, Lexus RX 330/400h and Toyota Highlander/Highlander Hybrid, and American Honda’s Saitama, Japan, plant, which produces the Acura RL, Acura TSX and Honda CR-V, tie for the Bronze Plant Quality Award.

Magna Steyr, the Graz, Austria, plant that assembles under contract for traditional manufacturers, receives the Gold Plant Quality Award for Europe. Magna Steyr produces the BMW X3, Mercedes-Benz E-Class/Wagon and the Saab 9-3 Convertible. BMW’s Dingolfing, Germany, plant, which produces the BMW 5, 6 and 7 Series, receives the Silver Plant Quality Award, and Porsche’s Valmet, Finland, plant, which produces the Cayman and Boxster, receives the Bronze Plant Quality Award.

The 2006 Initial Quality Study is based on responses from 63,607 purchasers and lessees of new 2006 model-year cars and trucks surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The redesigned IQS is based on a new 217-question battery—up from 135 in previous years—to provide manufacturers with richer information to improve problem determination and drive product improvement. The study also groups models in a revised J.D. Power and Associates vehicle segmentation list.

The 2006 study has been redesigned for the first time since 1998. Improvements to the study include:

* An enhanced questionnaire for owners to aid in identification of both defect and design problems
* Expanded coverage of new technologies
* Additional details about the problems reported to help OEMs better identify how to address them

Nawambo
06-08-2006, 03:12 PM
What type of drugs are they on over there? :confused:

My God, we should compare that to Consumer Reports' figures. Sheesh.

Thanks for the find,

Nawambo

scott_gunn
06-08-2006, 03:47 PM
It's "Initial Quality," which is far different than "reliability." These are survey based numbers so I don't think JD Powers is intentionally fudging the numbers. Just because Subaru doesn't do well in this particular study doesn't automatically make it nonsense.

humara
06-08-2006, 03:59 PM
since subaru packs no techno gizmos in their cars, the ratings should have gone up for them this year since JD power changed the rating system.
that said, initial quality after 90 days is a pretty random way to judge a car.
also, they only surveyed what 63,000 people? there are 37 brands. and lets just say each brand has 5 models (even though that is not correct). that means on average, 1702 people per brand replied. which is about 340 people per model. if you take into account sales volume per brand, that means about 50 people replied with a wrx. and maybe 600 people with an accord. hmmmm, lets think about that for a minute...
is it possible to have 60 people upset with something with their car in 90 days???
it's enough to make you think JD powers has as much accuracy as the nasioc glass tranny threads....
where's that darn rolls eyes icon?

BigElm
06-08-2006, 05:09 PM
Maybe I should ban all JD Power threads since they mean absolutely nothing to us... and not because Subaru is not where we think it should be... their analysis and survey just suck all together...

:rolleyes:

jaobrien6
06-08-2006, 05:56 PM
Basically this survey shows how happy people are with their new cars (especially now that they're including things like design quality in the IQ survey). The more things they have to complain about, the worse the car does in the survey. The problem is, the best car in the list, Porsche, has an average of .9 complaints per car. The worse, Land Rover, has 2 complaints per car. Sooo, if I buy the best car on the list, I bitch about 1 thing, if I buy the worst car on the list, I bitch about 2 things. This just doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

rsholland
06-08-2006, 06:08 PM
is nothing more than a honeymoon report.

What's important is long-term satisfaction, and Subaru does well there.

Bob

jaobrien6
06-08-2006, 06:33 PM
Yup, their Vehicle Dependability Survey is more useful, IMO. Even so, that's only 3 years. My car's still under warranty in the first 3 years.

What I *really* want to know about a car is how much it's going to break after the warranty is up. I want to know how much owning and maintaining this car is going to cost me. That's the thing that's really hard to reliably determine, no matter how much infomation you gather from JD Power surverys, Consumer Reports Surverys, Web Forums, andectocal evidence from family and friends, or whereever.

SoDealer
06-08-2006, 07:51 PM
is nothing more than a honeymoon report.

What's important is long-term satisfaction, and Subaru does well there.

Bob


according to JD PaymeforbetterrankingsOwer... that's not the case

http://www.jdpower.com/presspass/pr/images/2005089a.gif

BOY
06-08-2006, 09:29 PM
Wow, 9 out of the top 14 I wouldn't go near with a 10' pole in a quality discussion.

Impreza2003
06-08-2006, 09:41 PM
atleast they got the land rover stat right

nate49509
06-08-2006, 10:02 PM
:yawn:

ricky03
06-08-2006, 10:33 PM
They list the Caymen as leading a class with about 100 delivered :confused:

chowder31
06-08-2006, 10:47 PM
i didnt know the big 3 were that desparate....JD must have gotten a nice bonus

Consumer Reports FTW