I know its two different places but look at the torque curve compared before and after, what a difference. now the car is a monster. :) :banana:

Got it tuned @ TurboTrix and they did an amazing job. Thanks to Mark for a great tune!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v168/xdrian/subaru/dyno277.jpg

^^^Before^^^

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v168/xdrian/subaru/dyno2.jpg


^^^After^^^

Can you post the baseline on your "after" dyno map?

dont have the baseline right now, ill see if i can get it from the tuner tomorrow

Yeah, it would be nice to see the first run from the second tuning. Hard to compare the two shown from 2 different dynos, etc...

nice. mods?

vf34 ported and coated
big top mount intercooler
perrin headers/uppipe
tuboxs utec
turboback exhaust
boost set at 23psi
100% meth

very nice...almost the same setup i am goin to run..have everything sitting in my room just waitin on some stuff...

if the top graph were in rpms it would be a better comparison

impressive... I remember AZscoobie mentioning a while back that he noticed stock rods snapping somewhere around what you are making for torque...:)

impressive... I remember AZscoobie mentioning a while back that he noticed stock rods snapping somewhere around what you are making for torque...:)

I doubt it, I saw people with a 20G that put down way more power than me on stock block and they were ok.

maybe the 02s internals are crappy...ive been runing 333 wtq on MY06 wrx w/ TD04 for about 12000 miles, my 20G is sitting in the trunk waiting for the FMIC install to be finished

CHRIS

looks like 4200 -4300 full boost, isn't that a bit laggy for vf34 ???

looks like 4200 -4300 full boost, isn't that a bit laggy for vf34 ???

Looks like the tuner floored the car at 3500rpm or so. This would make it seem like the turbo takes longer than it really does to spool.

yes it definatley spools a lot faster on the street. I start spooling before 2500rpm on the street and then have fool boost by about 3-3100rpm

Can you post the baseline on your "after" dyno map?

Or tell folks what a stock WRX or STi dynos at on both systems.

Larry

You didn't like Alan's tune??!

this must be a 2.5L block, becuase you simply arent going to get that kind of torque from a vf34....that or the dyno is totally messed up.

this must be a 2.5L block, becuase you simply arent going to get that kind of torque from a vf34....that or the dyno is totally messed up.

agreed

Or tell folks what a stock WRX or STi dynos at on both systems.

Larry


My stock 06 dynoed at 240 whp in 4th gear on turbotrix dyno.

I doubt it, I saw people with a 20G that put down way more power than me on stock block and they were ok.

perform a few searches under AZscoobie's sn and also phil from Element tuning and see what they had to say on the topic a while back.:)

there's no doubt that turbos are out there that can make the power, but the EJ205 isn't running forged rods (cast) so isn't as tough as the 2.5 engines.

it is an ej205 but lets hope those internals hold up

yea thats alot of power thru a stock 2.0L......im sure he has plans for a build up......


-mikey

Looks good... hope that tune holds up.

Great numbers.

who tuned the first car?

impressive... I remember AZscoobie mentioning a while back that he noticed stock rods snapping somewhere around what you are making for torque...:)


Yea I believe it was around 405 lb/ft at the flywheel.

who tuned the first car?

no one, the car was not tuned at the moment

no one, the car was not tuned at the moment

so you mean the first dyno graphic is untune???

it doesn't even look like tq curve in the first graph, looks more like 2 different hp curve

Yea I believe it was around 405 lb/ft at the flywheel.

yes you found it, and Azscoobie mentions keeping torque under 350wtq to keep the rods from snapping off..:)

i dont think 358wtq would do too much damage

While there is obviously a difference since your car was tuned for the second one, what you arent getting is that the difference between the numbers on those two sheets is entirely meaningless.

You can make 350whp on one dyno, then go to another and make 290, then to yet another, and make closer to 400.

There is a local dyno in town where a stock STI only makes 190whp.


You cannot compare those two sheets to each other.


Besides, who gives a rats ass what a car does on paper? Are you happy with what it does when you mash your right foot down? Thats what matters :)

that's an amazing torque from 2.0L engine... looks more like 2.5L map.

I think that this customer came in for our free dyno day and recieved a base dyno pull for free and that is the sheet he posted from our shop - obviously in need of a tune

Nice post tuning dyno sheet !

Enjoy

I don't see how a vf34 can make 310whp, 358wtq?

Really odd, just doesn't add up. How are you making 60wtq more than everyone else?

Apparently TT just tuned my friends vf39, tbe, and ecutek with a stock topmount and it made 330whp, to me that's ubelievable. How are they getting these numbers?

I'm going to go do a pull on their dyno to see what I make, im curious now.

Most people don't run 23 PSI on a EJ205 is why.

what are the corrected #'s

Nice numbers! car must feel good on the street.

I don't see how a vf34 can make 310whp, 358wtq?

Aggressive tune, lotsa boost, meth inj. It could be a high reading dyno, but it is possible.

I don't see how a vf34 can make 310whp, 358wtq?

Really odd, just doesn't add up. How are you making 60wtq more than everyone else?

Apparently TT just tuned my friends vf39, tbe, and ecutek with a stock topmount and it made 330whp, to me that's ubelievable. How are they getting these numbers?

I'm going to go do a pull on their dyno to see what I make, im curious now.

23psi and 100% meth....that's your answer, it's not pump gas and 18-20 psi like your comparisons

but stil, 310whp sounds right with meth, but 358wtq? That sounds unheard of on a 205.

That's just me....

I can't tel anything from those 2 graphs. One is Torque over Speed and the other is Torque over RPM. Plus they are on two different dynos of different makes. Some dynos show a quicker onset of torque than others. There's nothing to compare here. You need 2 graphs from the same mill.