Google
 
Web NASIOC.com

View Full Version : ARFabs 675whp Rex, (VID post #47)


Brady12
12-24-2006, 06:01 PM
Congrats to Howard & ARFabrication.com on their custom GT40R in house custom built engine.

Here's the link

http://www.iwsti.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1036433&posted=1#post1036433

These guys are freak'n ridiculous, they are definitely raising the bar.

Well done Howard!

9vapors
12-24-2006, 07:26 PM
Wow! Congrats! That seems to be an amazing car, I can't wait to see what she runs!

EnterTheDragon
12-24-2006, 07:34 PM
RWD but still amazing

ted@mb
12-24-2006, 07:45 PM
hahahaha

ShaggyGT
12-24-2006, 07:56 PM
Yeah this guy is raising the bar: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1160611

AWD Too

RR02wrx
12-24-2006, 09:44 PM
I'm glad to see these high hp subies coming from other places than PR/Europe/Austrailia....

railguy
12-24-2006, 10:27 PM
I am pretty sure it is not rwd, I could be wrong but last time I talked to howard he never mentioned that to me.......Lets hope my red puts out good numbers down their. But none the less congrats (I was hoping for 700, but that is only time)

Eric

suby44
12-24-2006, 11:16 PM
Very nice to see another subie with a normal sized turbo!!!;) GREAT #'s guys!!

distorto
12-24-2006, 11:31 PM
what was causing all of the air blowing from under the engine?

STi_Guy04
12-24-2006, 11:35 PM
what clutch they using?? :p

bigboy
12-24-2006, 11:58 PM
that thing is sick...holy crap

Brady12
12-25-2006, 12:34 AM
Correction

This was actually a GT40R.

Shes not RWD, yet. Howard has big plans for her, this is just the beginning of the beasts journey.

blowbyu24
12-25-2006, 12:48 AM
looking good, can't believe how much hp

99subi
12-25-2006, 02:23 AM
to bad its ugly

sonic rx
12-25-2006, 02:26 AM
that is frickin awsome!!!!!!!!! looks like it took awhile to get going though. either way i am sure that thing hits hard!!!!! nice job!!! what trans? :devil:

sonic rx
12-25-2006, 02:27 AM
to bad its ugly

when it is moving it will be a color called blur ;)

nxttruck2002
12-25-2006, 05:22 AM
:eek: :eek: :eek:

jays05
12-25-2006, 10:00 AM
That's the lumpiest, nastiest idle I've ever heard on a subaru. Totally amazed!

xdrian
12-25-2006, 06:22 PM
wow very nice powa in that thing

kcook
12-25-2006, 07:02 PM
what gear was that pull in?

RaceSleeves
12-25-2006, 09:19 PM
The car is still on the factory trans at this time. We are getting AndrewTech to build us a dogbox for it.

To answer the question of all the blowing under the car....It has a 3.5" downpipe exiting straight down........It blows all of the dirt from the pits up and under the engine... :)

Before I can go any further with the project I have to upgrade the MAP sensor to a 5bar.....

The clutch thats in the car is a Tilton Carbon plate clutch......Its having a hydralic release problem that we were unable to fix....so we have to call Tilton sometime this week and figure out whats wrong.

Its ugly because we are working on the driveline and mechanical things first.....The car will get a widebody conversion before its all said and done though.....For now my money is going into the drivetrain.

Happy Holidays
AR Fab
RaceSleeves

kcook
12-25-2006, 11:34 PM
how big is the block , built 2L or 25? what gear was that cause the spool sounded realllllllllllllllll slow. i know its a 40r , but still

thechoochman28
12-26-2006, 12:03 AM
how big is the block , built 2L or 25? what gear was that cause the spool sounded realllllllllllllllll slow. i know its a 40r , but still

I think it said a built 2.7L block... i agree the spool is way too slow for my taste.

LukeWRX
12-26-2006, 12:36 AM
RWD but still amazing


Did you watch the video!?!?! AWD dyno :lol:

wcbjr
12-26-2006, 10:09 AM
Torque seems low for a 2.7L.

Speed
12-26-2006, 12:47 PM
Torque seems low for a 2.7L.

647 lb/ft ? Well if that's low for you then ... yes. :D

Silver '02 REX
12-26-2006, 01:30 PM
Torque seems low for a 2.7L.
Huge cams do that don't they?

vlady
12-26-2006, 02:43 PM
Amazing job pushing the envelope guys! I can't wait to see what happens in a month or so... :)

jays05
12-26-2006, 02:43 PM
Torque seems low for a 2.7L.

Yeah a 20g would tear this thing up on the street. :rolleyes: :lol:

SilverSurfer04STi
12-26-2006, 03:47 PM
Just curious, why are you making this RWD? Just because you like it better? Using it for drift events? Some sort of advantage at the drag strip?

Good job on the power. Looks monstrous.

modaddict
12-26-2006, 04:06 PM
Yeah a 20g would tear this thing up on the street. :rolleyes: :lol:

:lol: :lol:

hybooststi
12-26-2006, 08:51 PM
congrats howard glad to see you got things rolling. let me know when your ready to produce another kit. congrats im sure your goal of 1000awhp will be attainable once you get the bugs worked out. its downhill from here my man.:D

k.c.

checque
12-27-2006, 02:41 AM
Congrats Howard and everyone at AR Fab!
Now I know why my intake manifold got put on the back burner!

japslapr
12-27-2006, 11:05 AM
I never thought slowly getting on the throttle on dyno's ever helped or made things quite accurate.

I had a roots blown car and tried it the last time it was on a dyno. Slow roll on the throttle and stomping on it netted 60ft lbs difference.

modaddict
12-27-2006, 01:32 PM
^^^LOL, that's just lag....:lol: ;) :p

j/k

CoolRex
12-27-2006, 01:57 PM
Lag???? Bah turbo lag is just foreplay ;)

DoctorNick
12-27-2006, 03:26 PM
Again, I am so glad Nick doesn't allow "sigs". I get a headache trying to read thru all that. :lol:

Is there a dyno picture anywhere? or just in the video? and what does a stock STi make on that dyno?

Brady12
12-27-2006, 11:58 PM
Lag???? Bah turbo lag is just foreplay ;)

Dude thats awesome, that should be on a sticker, well put!

CoolRex
12-28-2006, 10:00 AM
Dude thats awesome, that should be on a sticker, well put!

:p :p :p

wcbjr
12-28-2006, 12:52 PM
647 lb/ft ? Well if that's low for you then ... yes. :D

Whoops, missed that number. Lol.

jblaine
12-28-2006, 02:24 PM
Dude thats awesome, that should be on a sticker, well put!
It's already on a t-shirt.

http://www.slowboyracing.com//more.php?id=1687&PHPSESSID=f9b9bbc17262098661d997b5301673ce&PHPSESSID=f9b9bbc17262098661d997b5301673ce

*cough*

AZScoobie
12-28-2006, 02:33 PM
Not bad guys! It knocked on that run.. :( Sounds a little off key on the bottom end. But cant argue with 675!

Clark

jblaine
12-28-2006, 02:39 PM
By the way, here's the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGzO147AymY

So you don't have to go over to iwsti.

CoolRex
12-28-2006, 03:32 PM
It's already on a t-shirt.

http://www.slowboyracing.com//more.php?id=1687&PHPSESSID=f9b9bbc17262098661d997b5301673ce&PHPSESSID=f9b9bbc17262098661d997b5301673ce

*cough*

Yep. It came from my old DSM days. There was a group of us goofing off and one of the guys said that. It was classic.

Skully
12-29-2006, 12:14 AM
Dunno why, but that doesn't sound like 600whp. I've see/heard high HP cars...and that just doesnt do it for me. Turbo had 0 for powerband as well. But, i guess i'll be more impressed when i see track times come out of it.

-Thomas

AZScoobie
12-29-2006, 12:27 AM
Remember. The car is on an inertia load dynojet dyno. The load is very light. once the car comes on boost the run is very short. This makes for Great numbers. The car knocked on that run as soon by the missing section of the Dyno chart. This happens when the knock causes the magnetic pickup interference. This state of tune would never make it through a pull on a loading dyno. Expect 580-600whp on a loading dyno with a no knock tune. Not bad!

Clark

sonic rx
12-29-2006, 12:41 AM
Remember. The car is on an inertia load dynojet dyno. The load is very light. once the car comes on boost the run is very short. This makes for Great numbers. The car knocked on that run as soon by the missing section of the Dyno chart. This happens when the knock causes the magnetic pickup interference. This state of tune would never make it through a pull on a loading dyno. Expect 580-600whp on a loading dyno with a no knock tune. Not bad!

Clark

are the dyno dynamics ,and mustang dyno's inertia load type dyno's also?

AZScoobie
12-29-2006, 12:59 AM
No sir. They are load type dynos.

Clark

sonic rx
12-29-2006, 01:01 AM
No sir. They are load type dynos.

Clark

i thought the dynapak was a load type dyno,and roller style type dynos were inertia. so what is the dynapak dyno? i am confused now

AZScoobie
12-29-2006, 01:38 AM
:) This is going to turn into a dyno tech thread which we dont need.. Do some reading on the manufactures web pages for the dynos that you wish to learn about.

The Dynojet is inertia.. The dyno depends on the weight and rolling resistance for load. Dynapaks use loading pods and water. Mustang and Dyno dynamics use Eddy current load generators. Think of a huge electric motor that loads the car down.

Clark

sperry7
12-29-2006, 01:49 AM
^Clark... keeping em honest and then lightly complimenting :lol:

AZScoobie
12-29-2006, 01:56 AM
Naw.. How can you not be impressed with 675 even if it is on a dynojet! I am impressed..

Clark

Skully
12-29-2006, 04:21 AM
I would still like to see a timeslip... not really dyno numbers :D But i guess the suby comunity is known for having 12 second 500whp cars... which blows my mind. I guess i'll just have to sit back and wait.

-Thomas