Google
 
Web NASIOC.com

View Full Version : 2009 WRX Stage 2 tune


JoeyOKC
07-07-2009, 09:52 PM
right lane

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a377/djarkitek/joeysrun.jpg

SpdDemon69
07-07-2009, 09:54 PM
do u have any vids up yet?

JoeyOKC
07-07-2009, 09:58 PM
vids of what? There is no awd dyno anywhere near OKC and I don't have a video camera haha

SpdDemon69
07-10-2009, 12:14 AM
vids of anything!!! do some street pulls :p

cell phone camera ftw

LittleBlueGT
07-10-2009, 12:32 AM
Did you use airboy's sheet for tuning and whp purposes?

If so, post it up!

LittleBlueGT
07-10-2009, 12:33 AM
Can you also post up a stock rom, I have to tune my buddies in a couple of weeks.

JoeyOKC
07-10-2009, 11:48 AM
http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=184afe2c2fd7431a312dbd5f2bdc5062e04e75f6 e8ebb871

stock file

awwsheet
07-13-2009, 06:21 AM
what mods are you running with this?

andya
07-14-2009, 12:27 AM
Turbo back exhaust and drop in K&N.

eminehart
07-14-2009, 02:55 AM
The only issue I see with the map is it looks like the tuner is unfamiliar with boost control on the 08+ cars. The map has a bunch of numbers that look pretty but are in fact meaningless. You have to approach boost control a little different or completely rework the drive by wire system. It is no longer the case that the last column is your target boost for WOT and Wastegate duty.

andya
07-14-2009, 09:46 AM
The only issue I see with the map is it looks like the tuner is unfamiliar with boost control on the 08+ cars. The map has a bunch of numbers that look pretty but are in fact meaningless. You have to approach boost control a little different or completely rework the drive by wire system. It is no longer the case that the last column is your target boost for WOT and Wastegate duty.


You are indeed correct... It was late and noticed this after completion, but left it alone. Finished the map after a good nights sleep. :)

boostdog
07-16-2009, 08:39 AM
so what's it look like now? you live in OKC.. when are we going to tulsa to hit the 1/4? LOL

04stisleeper
07-16-2009, 08:55 AM
Hey Joey, good to see things are going great with your car, and as always good to hear that andya is keeping up the good work.....

Mike

nicopete
08-14-2009, 06:37 PM
Hi, I was taking a look to your map and saw a lot lower WGDC than I have and higher Boost Targets. Are you really getting to your targets? Do you have an available log showing boost?

On the other side I'm comparing it to my 08 WRX VF52 map (commercial map) and I see base timmings a lot higher than yours (3-4 degrees)... and since my car is not yet "defined" in RR nor Ecuflash I canīt track knock... The map is a 91 oct map. The maximum advance tables are "comparable" in magnitude...

Any insights?
Thanks!

JoeyOKC
08-18-2009, 12:22 AM
wow....i'm really slacking on this one. i forgot about this thread. let me post my latest revision and a log......


stay tuned....

JoeyOKC
08-18-2009, 12:34 AM
I changed some stuff. I guess you'd just have to compare maps to see. been working on just simple drivability and qualities of the tune that would cater to the way that i drive.

http://www.mediafire.com/file/zznyznnlmwm/JOEYLATEST.hex

datalogs....it was hard to find too many that i had taken it to 6,000rpms. i usually shift around 6,000rpms.
http://www.mediafire.com/?mzdzdgbjfi3
http://www.mediafire.com/?mdkvhyzkmim
http://www.mediafire.com/?nziemzmqmtg

JoeyOKC
08-18-2009, 12:43 AM
I'm wanting the boost to taper off a little less. I'm trying to learn how to tune the wastegate duty cycle. i'm on a trial and error basis right now(with a little help from my friends) and just watching my fine learn and feedback like a hawk.

jaxscuby
08-18-2009, 05:45 AM
fuel consumption in romraider is not correct..

JoeyOKC
08-18-2009, 08:46 AM
fuel consumption in romraider is not correct..
can you explain more? i have an LM-1 that i can't get to interface with my computer. It's showing rougly 11:1 and tapering up to around 11:3 or 11:4. It isn't exactly where I would want it, but the car seems to run well and isn't picking up any knock.

nicopete
08-18-2009, 09:43 AM
I'm wanting the boost to taper off a little less. I'm trying to learn how to tune the wastegate duty cycle. i'm on a trial and error basis right now(with a little help from my friends) and just watching my fine learn and feedback like a hawk.

I think you Max WGDC are low on the 4800+ side of your table. I would plot your WGDC, Max WGDC, Initial WGDC and boost vs RPM. You will easily notice whether you are limited by WGDC or by the size of the turbo. I think you still have some space on high RPM but I would not expect 17 psi to redline…

Example of one of my prior logs below. You can see that my WGDC was maxed by the limit imposed by the Max WGDC (after compensations). The Max V7 was my other attempt to increase the boost at higher Rpms...

I hope it helps.

PD: A/F readings from Romraider are from the narrow band and I don't remember if it is affected by turbo pressures or it is behind the cat and so reads higher. It is only useful on Closed Loop situations.

PD2: Your fueling targets are 10.2-10.4 on high loads high rpms, your measuremnt is after cat? Why is it so much higher than target ones?

http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/8940/boostvswgdc.jpg (http://img517.imageshack.us/i/boostvswgdc.jpg/)

JoeyOKC
08-18-2009, 10:44 AM
It's my understanding that the numbers in the fueling tables are not directly indicitive of the afr, but a basic way of plotting the fuel curve. I have a catless downpipe and the wideband is tapped in about 16" from the turbo, in the downpipe.

nicopete
08-18-2009, 11:05 AM
It's my understanding that the numbers in the fueling tables are not directly indicitive of the afr, but a basic way of plotting the fuel curve. I have a catless downpipe and the wideband is tapped in about 16" from the turbo, in the downpipe.

I agree but my querie is since in my car the fueling tables are pretty near my A/F readings.

JoeyOKC
08-18-2009, 12:18 PM
That's a good question. Hopefully someone can shed some light

elevenpoint7five
08-18-2009, 10:53 PM
It's my understanding that the numbers in the fueling tables are not directly indicitive of the afr, but a basic way of plotting the fuel curve. I have a catless downpipe and the wideband is tapped in about 16" from the turbo, in the downpipe.
your fueling table should be VERY close to what youre seeing. if not it means your MAF or injectors arent scaled properly. or something isnt working as it should(mechanical issue). sorry i dont have time right now to read the whole thread, its late and im tired, but i will read more sometime this week and try to be of more assistance.

JoeyOKC
08-18-2009, 11:39 PM
hmmmm...any pointers to properly scaling the maf? I pretty much just drove around for a while and plotted as many points as possible, interpolate 20, update maf, and plugged in the data to ecuflash.

JoeyOKC
09-20-2009, 07:39 PM
went 13.2@102 on tune.