dug-e-fresh
03-27-2001, 07:19 PM
0-60mph 5.4sec!!!!!
1/4mile 14.2sec at 93.6mph.
70mph-0 braking- 165ft.
Its cool too that my other car is reviewed right before the REX. (Grand Am GT1) In that review they refer to the GAGT1 as one of the twenty best cars they have ever tested for braking from 70mph. I have heard similiar praise from Motor Trend about the GAGT1. Now the GAGT1 took 162ft from 70mph. Whats the WRX, the 21st best car they ever tested? To me, statistically speaking 3ft is not significant enough to prove one is better than the other. Statistically if you were to sample 30 runs of each from 70mph you would probably find that they average very close to one another. Thus, one can say that the WRX has very good braking, and that was all tested with the 16" wheels and tires. Perhaps they have gotten better test results from a more thoroughly broke in car than other mags....maybe a more accurate look at what the WRX can do.....
1/4mile 14.2sec at 93.6mph.
70mph-0 braking- 165ft.
Its cool too that my other car is reviewed right before the REX. (Grand Am GT1) In that review they refer to the GAGT1 as one of the twenty best cars they have ever tested for braking from 70mph. I have heard similiar praise from Motor Trend about the GAGT1. Now the GAGT1 took 162ft from 70mph. Whats the WRX, the 21st best car they ever tested? To me, statistically speaking 3ft is not significant enough to prove one is better than the other. Statistically if you were to sample 30 runs of each from 70mph you would probably find that they average very close to one another. Thus, one can say that the WRX has very good braking, and that was all tested with the 16" wheels and tires. Perhaps they have gotten better test results from a more thoroughly broke in car than other mags....maybe a more accurate look at what the WRX can do.....