im looking for the most power subby in the word, but i can't find more than 550hp.

who know if there is a 600+ hp Scooby? link please

Esx Wrx

Stealth wrx has close to 600 at the crank

im looking for the most power subby in the word, but i can't find more than 550hp.

who know if there is a 600+ hp Scooby? link please

Crank or wheel?

Here's some wheel

Aussie cars Dyno less but go fast at the track.

If some of the cars on this page were Dyno'd in the US they would be over 600hp.
http://www.rigoliracing.com.au/dynoruns.htm

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v198/dbrier/Scooby.jpg

Ohhhh, I thought you said a 600+ lb Scooby.;)

ive seen one at the cobb meet 04 and have the pic on my wall but i doubt youll find info on it online. it had a ton of expiremental stuff on it.

That scooby is huge!

Stealth WRX is at 536whp so 600 at the crank is a little modest. I believe Dan@Godspeed is running over 600whp but I Icould be wrong.

I believe Dan@Godspeed is running over 600whp but I Icould be wrong.

That car is stock or close to it and, last I heard, for sale. It was used to for test fitting various parts.

You may want to talk to shawn (500hpwrxsti), with his new setup tuned, he should be at 600+whp.

Esx Wrx

2nded.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v198/dbrier/Scooby.jpg

Ohhhh, I thought you said a 600+ lb Scooby.;)


where do i get one of these :eek:

Doesn't JUN have some crazy WRX with 600+ hp and individual TBs?

Doesn't JUN have some crazy WRX with 600+ hp and individual TBs?
Pls explain how you would have individual TB's on a turbo motor.

Pls explain how you would have individual TB's on a turbo motor.
IIRC, The gti-r has individual TBs.

three letters- ESX

Pls explain how you would have individual TB's on a turbo motor.
Yea that's pretty ****ing weird... or just not possible fromw hat I thought.

Pls explain how you would have individual TB's on a turbo motor.

What would be the difference between a turbo motor and a NA motor that would keep it from having individual throttle bodies?

It might be late but Im sure that it makes no difference what so ever.

- Chris

the jun car has 2 intake manifolds and 2 throtle bodies. the turbo sits dead center behind the motor above the trans and boosts into the center tank of a vfmic with endtanks at either side that go to the 2 tbs

http://www.superstreetonline.com/featuredvehicles/130_0304_jun/

here

There is a GC8 Impreza in the UK with 695hp at the crank (inc 100 shot).

Paul

Pls explain how you would have individual TB's on a turbo motor.
Just tryed to find it but they don't have it on there web page now? APS had an individual throttle body settup on an engine. I had a pic of it but lost it or I would post it ;)

The skyline, and nissan pulsar both have individual throttle bodies. There isn't anything magical about using them on a turbo motor.

Paul

http://www.airpowersystems.com/wrx/apswrx-fmi-r2/display1.jpg

there's your ITB setup, dual fuel rails as well

omg that is hot. . .

What would be the difference between a turbo motor and a NA motor that would keep it from having individual throttle bodies?

It might be late but Im sure that it makes no difference what so ever.

- Chris
I would just think that the way you need to feed the air from the IC into the TB it wouldnt work very well.

Rigolis red wagon dynoed at 680hp atw on the 27 oct here in Oz which is damn crazy..

http://www.airpowersystems.com/wrx/apswrx-fmi-r2/display1.jpg

there's your ITB setup, dual fuel rails as well

And will probably never be sold to the public. :(

The aps TB setup has been canned.

Rigolis red wagon dynoed at 680hp atw on the 27 oct here in Oz which is damn crazy..
27 octane :confused: Whats that a drunk guys wizz??

The 27th of OCTOBER fewl

The 27th of OCTOBER fewl

http://www.funkyfridge.com/shop/images/AB-BP-24819.jpg

the jun car has 2 intake manifolds and 2 throtle bodies. the turbo sits dead center behind the motor above the trans and boosts into the center tank of a vfmic with endtanks at either side that go to the 2 tbs

http://www.superstreetonline.com/featuredvehicles/130_0304_jun/

here

the jun car has 2 intake manifolds, and 4 throttle bodies.

http://superstreetonline.com/featuredvehicles/130_0304_jun_9_z.jpg

see that little throttle cable hidden down in there? the runners are separate allready, so that means there are 4 butterfly valves, and AFAIK, that means 4 throttle bodies.

the jun car has 2 intake manifolds, and 4 throttle bodies.

http://superstreetonline.com/featuredvehicles/130_0304_jun_9_z.jpg

see that little throttle cable hidden down in there? the runners are separate allready, so that means there are 4 butterfly valves, and AFAIK, that means 4 throttle bodies.
sweet mother of god!!!

that car is Rice...just look at it, the engine is like....green and stuf....and it so does not match the yellow banana pointjob...

sweet mother of god!!!

that car is Rice...just look at it, the engine is like....green and stuf....and it so does not match the yellow banana pointjob...

It's half green and half yellow.

I am still finding it hard to believe no one has seen throttle body per cylinder setups :confused: Not only that but no one here knows about the Jun car?! That car is obscene on the track, I think it still holds a record timewise :eek:

I am still finding it hard to believe no one has seen throttle body per cylinder setups :confused: Not only that but no one here knows about the Jun car?! That car is obscene on the track, I think it still holds a record timewise :eek:
Ive seen them. just on all motor cars, such as Hondas and the like, I never thought about how it would be incorporated into a turbo setup, I just thought too much piping would be involved to make it work.

Stealth wrx has close to 600 at the crank

535hp or so at the wheels puts my estimate at ~700 at the crank...

-SHane

I am still finding it hard to believe no one has seen throttle body per cylinder setups :confused: Not only that but no one here knows about the Jun car?! That car is obscene on the track, I think it still holds a record timewise :eek:

which record are talking about? it was the fastest Impreza for awhile, not sure about now. It was never the fastest in Japan. The winner of the Tsukaba Circut last year was that crazy carbon HKS Evo, a few years ago it was the JUN Lemon Evo

IIRC

Drew

which record are talking about? it was the fastest Impreza for awhile, not sure about now. It was never the fastest in Japan. The winner of the Tsukaba Circut last year was that crazy carbon HKS Evo, a few years ago it was the JUN Lemon Evo

IIRC

Drew
Was prolly the Tsukaba circut if I remember correctly but that car is old now. I prolly still have mags from like 02' with that thing in them? I remember it held the record but. it was so long ago now who knows :confused:

Was prolly the Tsukaba circut if I remember correctly but that car is old now. I prolly still have mags from like 02' with that thing in them? I remember it held the record but. it was so long ago now who knows :confused:

i have to agree w/ you there on the last part, i just sound like i know what im talking about

Drew

Ive seen them. just on all motor cars, such as Hondas and the like, I never thought about how it would be incorporated into a turbo setup, I just thought too much piping would be involved to make it work.

it doesnt take anymore piping than does a single throttlebody set up does... why would it take more its after the intak mani?

Actually I'll finally fess up to it :( I have a 600 HP WRX...I just have the boost turned down till I can find a clutch that will hold ;) :p

it doesnt take anymore piping than does a single throttlebody set up does... why would it take more its after the intak mani?
it just quadruples the cost of the piping, that's all custom fab and lots of it.

no it doesnt, look at thed jun, car, the throttle bodies are made to fit in just about where the stock tumble jenerator valves sit... that does not increas the ammount of piping, you just have to make the TBs. it increases the amount of TBs though, but then again thats the point. the piping can be all the same, and it is on turbo cars with IDB setups.

if thats the case then so do i, and so do many others... i have a turbo that can make 650hp, and i just have the boost turned down untill i can find a trans that will hold the power. Im going to run 2 bar of boost, and run 100 octane all day long with it.

about the jun clour being rice ? that just so happens to be there trademark colour . like top fuel is white, yashio factory is pink and so on . a buddy of mine has a sr-20 powered 200sx , and it has itb . it werks , just a pain to fine tune. :D

and it is on turbo cars with IDB setups.
Oh my... now you're just getting dirty. IDB setup!! :lol: :lol:

Here's one I just did with a GT30R. Since that's all she wrote for this turbo, he is switching to my Spec R 650 kit in the spring. We hope for around 550 WHP which is well over 600 HP.
http://www.godspeedinc.com/images/GT30Rnewmotor1.jpg
This was done with very modest mods and no nitrous or water injection whatsoever. In fact It was achieved with plain ole 100 octane unleaded fuel. The lower chart was done on straight 93 octane. Stock intake manifold, stock fuel rails, stock ECU (with UTEC), stock cams and valves and even stock radiator.

^^ Those huge turbo REALLY shine on higher octane. I can imagine C16.

is this a 2.0 motor? im going to be doing the 2.5 in my WRX with t-67... what is IDB??

Actually I'll finally fess up to it :( I have a 600 HP WRX...I just have the boost turned down till I can find a clutch that will hold ;) :p

Yeah, me too! :lol: ;)

i meant ITB individual throttle body

To those who say ESX :lol:. It is just re-labeled Rigoli goods.

http://www.airpowersystems.com.au/wrx/track/calder/calder_video.html

http://www.airpowersystems.com.au/wrx/track/bluerex_dyno/dyno_video.html

To those who say ESX :lol:. It is just re-labeled Rigoli goods.
you are correct....now the new car on the other hand, I don't know

http://www.airpowersystems.com.au/wrx/track/calder/calder_video.html


Now if I can get my car to go like that maybe I will finally be able to merge onto the Somerville Circle :lol: