Might be OT but I figure more people here read GRM than any other section.

Read the copy on page 11 from tesla electronics, inc.

Yes, its possible. Now you can be a pro without *braking*[sic] the bank. G-TECH/Pro RR Performance Meter will help you shave-off *tents[sic], if not seconds, by showing you where you could improve. *I[sic] has ** world-first G-threshold Lights that let you know when you are close to "the edge" during braking or cornering. All the sensors, including RPM pick-up and termperature compensated accelerometers, are built-in so there's no installation.

** "the" is missing.

OK I could take the braking as a play on words though I doubt it was intentional.

Oh well guess I am just bored and thought that was funny. Besides unless they mention it specifically in their ad I doubt that the unit compensates for body roll hence overstating lateral g-forces.

Youre Engrisg aint perfect ither.

Not at all - but on a bulletin board I also aint being paid to provide copy in a national magazine article. If they can't use enough caution proofing their expensive article how much do they pay attention to the details of the product they are selling. Oh well I just thought it was funny after all the money spent on an ad they couldn't afford a proof reader. What would be worse is if they had an ad agency print it and the agency let that go out.

"Hey, can you breeve?"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/435000/images/_437303_ice_cube150.jpg

Honestly, that many errors, no I probably wouldn't. Not unless I had previous good experience with the company.

If it was just one typo, then it probably wouldn't affect my buying decision. More than one, yes.

Yeah, that's pretty messesd up. Even without the grammatical errors, it sounds like a 2nd grader pumped that out.