What's the deal with the RPM signal on the UTEC log 1? It seems to jump around quite a bit. I was trying to extrapolate out acceleration, and you might as well forget it, since the RPM's on the log are practically useless. For example, I have loggs where the car is accelerating, and the RPM stays the same over the 2 steps, there was DEFINITELY no hesitation in torque. I just got a new clutch, and it is NOT slipping. Does anyone have any idea of how to get a better RPM signal, or why it jumps around so much?

Thanks,
Derek

Here's a log:
4035 +11.0 3.7 99 70 00 rich +20.3 56.0 +15.2 +0.3 290.00 3.4
4198 +12.7 3.9 98 80 00 rich +18.3 59.1 +15.6 +0.3 290.00 3.6
4357 +14.7 3.9 98 90 00 rich +17.0 65.6 +16.7 +0.5 290.00 3.6
4591 +15.7 4.1 99 90 00 rich +17.6 69.1 +17.6 +0.5 290.00 3.8
4789 +16.4 4.1 98 90 00 rich +20.4 76.0 +19.0 +0.5 290.00 3.8
4901 +17.4 4.1 98 100 00 rich +23.0 76.1 +19.7 -0.7 290.00 3.8
5089 +17.2 4.2 98 100 00 rich +24.5 79.6 +20.7 -1.2 290.00 3.8
5509 +17.2 4.2 98 90 00 rich +24.6 80.4 +21.0 -1.4 290.00 3.9
5509 +17.4 4.3 98 90 00 rich +24.7 84.4 +21.0 -1.3 290.00 3.9
5717 +16.6 4.3 98 90 00 rich +24.9 85.2 +21.0 -1.3 290.00 4.0

5509 twice in a row? I don't think so.

I have the same problem, my rpm's even decrease as the car is accelerating.
I wonder what would happen if I used a rpm input with LM-1.

It's not a problem. From what I hear it's cause the utec doesn't give logging as high a priority as it gives other things(like running the car).

peace

Seems kinda pointless, for the UTEC to be posting RPM numbers that are not right. I would be happier if it was reporting something with less accuracy, like 1K, 2K, 3K, or 1200, 1300, 1400, instead of giving us bogus info.