Thread: Turbo vs N/A?
View Single Post
Old 04-25-2002, 02:01 PM   #15
Josico
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 8219
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Vehicle:
2002 Impreza RS
Blue Ridge Pearl

Default

what i meant to say is the Turbo VS the SC

here is an upcoming SC kit link...
http://www.rs25.com/Forums/showthrea...s=&threadid=42

read page 21 for a "summing it all up" post...
http://www.rs25.com/Forums/showthrea...&pagenumber=21

also, i've heard that COBB is making a SC kit also.
http://www.wrxforum.com/cgi-bin/ulti...c;f=4;t=000003

and the reason i'm considering to Turbo or SC my MY02 RS is that i only paid 25K cnd for it where as i would have had to pay around 37K cnd for a WRX.

and then adding that 5K for the WRX i would have to had paid 45K cnd for the modding of my car which i pay for myself !!

so yeah, a RS-T is the 'cheaper' route for me to take, but i'm doing my research as well. i've heard that the Rimmer kits were bad so i opted out SC until i heard of the two kits i saw (posted above)...

what i'd like to know is why are SC kits always looked down upon when compared to a Turbo? is it really the better way to go (the turbo) or just that there was never a good SC kit that was developed for the EJ25?
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Josico is offline   Reply With Quote