Thread: Turbo vs N/A?
View Single Post
Old 04-26-2002, 04:05 AM   #21
Josico
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 8219
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Vehicle:
2002 Impreza RS
Blue Ridge Pearl

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by erice1984
turbo should be the last thing you do to a N/A engine. build it up strong then at the end when all other options are done. you turbo charge the M***********.
haha.. i like that... i might as well do that meanwhile as i wait for the news of the SC kits and / or Turbo kits that may come out later on?

Danz: well i'm just thinking of what you are saying regards to the higher displacement and SC. i gues you are correct. however for my purposes (which is strictly AutoCrossing - Solo 2)... i would believe the low end is what i want? do you agree with that?... or still believe the turbo is more effienct. (if so, please pursuade me heh )
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Josico is offline   Reply With Quote