View Single Post
Old 05-19-2002, 12:33 PM   #19
Carlo
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 18376
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 367 WHP / 460 at the Crank!
Vehicle:
367 WHP!
460 HP at the crank!

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nmyeti


We've had lots of problems with cars that have the AEM installed.

We don't recomend it, and really don't even like to tune a car with that intake.

The injen seems to be quite a bit nicer to tune... It's also only 2mm larger at the MAS housing, so the car runs a little less lean from the start with this CAI.

As a side note, we make more power by just cutting the Injen off before the pipe goes into the fender. You can get a consistant 2-3hp gain from hacking the injen. Makes you wonder what good a CAI is right?

-Nathan
www.turboxs.com
Hey Nathan is that 2 or 3hp over the CAI intake or over the stock setup or over the Resonator removal as in stage 1? Also when you say 2 or 3hp increase is that on an otherwise stock system or one of the stage setups (obviously makes a difference).

Also just for reference do you know roughly home much difference there is between the resonator/hack compared to the Injen/hack (shortened) on something like the stage 2 kit. Also, if you convert a standard stage 2 setup over to the injen/hack intake setup is there a new map for this?

Oh, and I might as well also ask about the TurboXS intake in the works. Is this going to be "knock-off" of the shortened Injen intake or will it be a little different in design?

Thanks,
Carlo
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Carlo is offline   Reply With Quote