View Single Post
Old 05-19-2002, 12:33 PM   #19
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 18376
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 367 WHP / 460 at the Crank!
367 WHP!
460 HP at the crank!


Originally posted by nmyeti

We've had lots of problems with cars that have the AEM installed.

We don't recomend it, and really don't even like to tune a car with that intake.

The injen seems to be quite a bit nicer to tune... It's also only 2mm larger at the MAS housing, so the car runs a little less lean from the start with this CAI.

As a side note, we make more power by just cutting the Injen off before the pipe goes into the fender. You can get a consistant 2-3hp gain from hacking the injen. Makes you wonder what good a CAI is right?

Hey Nathan is that 2 or 3hp over the CAI intake or over the stock setup or over the Resonator removal as in stage 1? Also when you say 2 or 3hp increase is that on an otherwise stock system or one of the stage setups (obviously makes a difference).

Also just for reference do you know roughly home much difference there is between the resonator/hack compared to the Injen/hack (shortened) on something like the stage 2 kit. Also, if you convert a standard stage 2 setup over to the injen/hack intake setup is there a new map for this?

Oh, and I might as well also ask about the TurboXS intake in the works. Is this going to be "knock-off" of the shortened Injen intake or will it be a little different in design?

* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Carlo is offline   Reply With Quote