View Single Post
Old 06-08-2009, 06:02 PM   #7
tazswing
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 63767
Join Date: Jun 2004
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: PDX
Vehicle:
2009 OXT 5-spd
2011 STi hatch

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sponaugle View Post
Yes, I'll correct it for the two downpipe. Indeed the AEM intake was pretty warm... or more to the point the sensor reads pretty warm. The actual air temp was not that hot, but the sensor heat soaks.

I looked at the logs before and after the foglight, and there was very little difference. A few hp, but nothing huge. Run to run variance was a bit more due to temp changes.

Jeff
Ah. so does that mean that the heat soak of the MAF does not matter so long as the air-charge is really not soaked? I don't know enough about the changes the computer is making based on a registered air charge. It would seem to me one could get much more out of the turbo if the actual and perceived air temp were close or the same measurement.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.

Last edited by tazswing; 06-08-2009 at 06:10 PM.
tazswing is offline   Reply With Quote