View Single Post
Old 10-22-2009, 08:12 PM   #65
JSarv
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 163445
Join Date: Nov 2007
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Effingham IL (Central IL)
Vehicle:
l33t *******
12.07@115.9mph-EJ205

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seanathanq83 View Post
sorry i went out and clarified it was 1 more psi, still help through redline, also 1 more degree at peak torque, and 2 more degree at redline, and better fueling, it was leaned out more this time about .2 across the board. so i can see where the power came from, it just seems that with SD it was easier to get these changes in
^^ Is why. Which is quite possible.

But was the maf tune taken to a verified (not ecu) knock threshold vs the SD tune?

See - really the only comparison would be a road tune of each - using det cans - then put it on the rollers and a quick update of each tune and compare.

Most likely, there is some maf fluctuation (I've noticed in my car load/fueling is much more consistent as the maf tends to wander a bit even with our slow logger)

So having a more consistent combustion to combustion afr is going to allow a bit more boost/timing to be ran on the same fuel. This is all given the maf was a little inconsistent to begin with.

-Jerod
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
JSarv is offline   Reply With Quote