View Single Post
Old 10-30-2009, 10:20 PM   #104
Scooby Guru
Member#: 48219
Join Date: Nov 2003
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
. Always drive
the race line .


Originally Posted by JSarv View Post
not this rom *******...

The maf based roms.

There is currently 1 little spot that I could use more resolution, again I'm a nut about not having any dips in closed loop/open loop transition.
Dude, clearly you are a flaming n00b. You were arguing your whole point about not having enough resolutions in the fuel map on a MAF based ROM? Jesus H freaking Christ. Holy ****! Please put down the USB cable and step away very slowly. Like seriously, stop tuning **** or at the very least stop posting on this BBS so other n00bs that are even n00bier than you won't read what BS you have to say and think it's even halfway legit.

Let me explain. In a MAF based car, you tell the ECU what AFR you want to run. Then the ECU calculates the appropriate pulsewidth based on what the MAF sensor tells it how much air is entering the engine. If you think the AFR table needs more resolution then you CLEARLY don't understand how MAF works. There are many MANY tables that govern the 'final afr target'. In my ROM, there's a table that delimits the minimum AFR to 12.98 if I'm above 88% TPS no matter what the Fuel Table says... For SD, I can see you argument slightly but in a MAF based car, it doesn't matter what the VE of the engine is!!!!!!! Air in = air out unless you have a leak in the system. The MAF measures air in! So if that is dead on, how the **** can anything else be off in terms of fueling? It can't, unless there are other maps that change the internal logic of the ECU that tells it to target a different AFR than what the OL Fuel Map calls for. Like the example I posted. On a MAF based car, I can confidently say that I can tune to any power level with an Open Loop fuel map that has only 4 cells in it. And if you don't see it then... HOLY ****! Stop posting please! There's enough misinformation on NASIOC as it is. Don't add to the BS.

But seriously, I cannot FREAKING believe I wasted my precious time trying to educate your worthlessness. Good bye!

Also, no ****, a SD ROM has less backfire than a MAF based ROM... Do you even somewhat understand the underlying principles? Because the caliber of your posts offer no such supporting evidence.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.

Last edited by MRF582; 10-30-2009 at 10:26 PM.
MRF582 is offline   Reply With Quote