View Single Post
Old 03-15-2010, 08:13 PM   #14
DeeezNuuuts83
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 34406
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Vehicle:
2006 Evolution IX
graphite gray

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REX8 View Post
That's fine, but no car like this is bought for the performance/$$$ ratio. No one called the CGT a waste (at it's much higher price), and it was outperformed by cars costing much less. Same thing can be said for the SLR, and the Enzo soon after its release.
But at the same time, nobody bought those cars specifically because they had a monocoque. It was definitely a notable characteristic, but nothing that made their buyers pony up the cash. They each had something special about them independent of the monocoque... the Carrera GT was Porsche's first hypercar, the SLR was co-developed with McLaren as an easy-to-drive, comfortable, slushbox 200 mph missile, and the Enzo was the usual limited-production Ferrari hypercar that is coveted by Ferrari fanatics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by REX8 View Post
These cars are bought for those who appreciate their engineering feats. Anyone buying something like this strictly for performance is out of their minds. Again, the same can be said for a number of these type cars, which I completely understand.

But if you are going to shout about this car being overpriced, there's a long list of others costing much more than this does, offering similar technology.
Agreed
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
DeeezNuuuts83 is offline   Reply With Quote