Thread: 4G63 vs EJ25
View Single Post
Old 07-07-2010, 02:49 PM   #127
Corinator
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 211974
Join Date: May 2009
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Vehicle:
2004 WRX STi PTE6466
2002 Sentra SE-R Spec V

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxwhat View Post
You don't think F1 cars would be awd if they could be?
Remember the GTO series here in America? Audi entered their Audi 90 IMSA GTO into the series and was very successful. But it is important to also note the fact that the Audi mainly excelled on tight curvy tracks and tracks where traction was low due to bad asphalt, rain, or high heat. The Audi team would win impressive 1-2 finishes by large margins under those conditions, but on several occasions the Audis would get brutally raped by the RWD American competitors.

What does this have to do with anything? It helps illustrate what happens when AWD is introduced into various on road racing series. Audi also was the first to introduce this technology into the rally racing championships. They consistently lost out to RWD cars like the Lancia Stratos or Porsches on the tarmac stages, but excelled under low traction. If traction is good RWD is superior due to lighter weight, less drivetrain drag, and the fact that it has a tendency to oversteer. AWD is great for assisting a driver maintain control and drive on low traction surfaces, but an AWD system is always plagued by the natural tendency to understeer which is something you don't want in a Formula 1 car that can pull 6 G-forces in a tight turn.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.

Last edited by Corinator; 07-07-2010 at 03:31 PM. Reason: wrong number of G-forces in a turn for F1 cars
Corinator is offline   Reply With Quote