Originally Posted by BuGS
Because the guy that you bought the setup for wasn't a douche. He was in the process of selling to you. I pmed and posted I had the money and was waiting.
And the only reason I called you out is because you were lying and saying you didn't know the condition. I remembered when you bought these cause I was looking at them, the question is why couldn't you remember? Or did you not want to so you could make more money... $200 for 70k miles and clunking is fair. $350 isn't.
did i not update the post? when i bought them the price was good and i only needed a winter setup so i didn't really pay attention to or care about the miles or the condition. every set of these clunks, and it's an easy fix, take them apart and throw some grease on them. 1 bolt to remove, big deal. again a simple pm and i would have changed that info, instead you post all this bs in the thread, so don't call me a liar, i updated everything to reflect their condition as soon as you brought it up. in fact i don't even know if they really have 70k miles on them or if you are bs'ing that too to try and lower the price... but i listed them as such anyway.
AND ITS $350 OBO
, SO DON'T WHINE ABOUT FAIR. fair is whatever someone is willing to pay, and what i'm willing to sell for. it's a free market, i have no obligation to sell at any specific price, nor does anyone have to buy at a specific price, this isn't communist Russia.
and i looked at what other setups were going for and set my price accordingly, so don't tell me what a good price is based on what you want to buy it as, I've done my research, i know what they are worth, and i listed them at a reasonable price, and obo, which means i am willing to negotiate.
one set with 40k miles listed at $400
another set, not even with sti springs and with gc tophats also at $400
and plenty of posts of just struts for about 200, one for struts that have 100k+ on them, are sticking, and need a rebuild. couldn't find any examples of a full set selling for $200 ever so bugs looks like you're SOL on this one.