Thread: Cobb Heads/Cams
View Single Post
Old 03-09-2003, 08:35 PM   #13
RawCode
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 3115
Join Date: Dec 2000
Chapter/Region: AKIC
Location: Anchorage,AK USA
Vehicle:
2002 Impreza 2.5RS
Silver

Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kostamojen

Passanger side, a couple more 90 degree bends then I would like to see... I dont know, just seems like TWE or the MRT are a little smoother with the bends. I still think an MRT-like design with better designed merging points that are not just prefabed merge collectors would be the perfect set up for our cars.
I do belive that an MRT setup seems to be ideal at first glance. It is a straight shot basiclly. The thing I always end up thinking is " Look at cusco and syms headers. They seem to have LOTS of bends but they work really well."

i.e.:


I know it is a turbo design, but if the bends there don't really hurt performance, why would cobb's bends that so detremental to performance?

RawCode

P.S. Once you do get to this level of NA mods ( heads, cams, headers) It would be best to go with some type of management system, if only fuel OR timing, but both would be best.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
RawCode is offline   Reply With Quote