Originally Posted by Rampager2000
No, classic doesn't mean stock or near stock. And I'm not arguing if older cars are cheap or not. (although late 60s muscle cars aren't exactly the cheapest cars to acquire) You are eluding the fact I am only calling him out for saying the engines are ****. Yes, from factory, they're slow. Put some work into them and those huge V8s make stupid power.
You can't even approach the argument properly.
What I'm saying is you're both right you ****ing moron. When HE was talking about classic, HE meant stock or near stock, that is afterall what classic means; old and original. Are they cheap now? **** no, but guess what, they weren't always this expensive. I know the engines, when properly modified, will perform very well; but what engine won't? You do the right mods to a WRX or STi and you'll gain a **** load of power too.
So, shut the **** up since you can't understand both sides of an argument.