View Single Post
Old 11-15-2012, 01:25 AM   #38
EvoChArGeR
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 117985
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Anchorage, AK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomadgene View Post
I was posting this in response to Evocharger the other night when this came up. It happened to be right when the nasioc server goes down for maintenance at 1AM.
I posted it earlier in the motorcycle thread.

Aprilia RSV4 vs. Audi R8 - YouTube

Name one car that YOU can afford EVOCHARGER that will beat any one of my decade old Aprilias. And yes, I can pull low 11s and even an occasional high 10 on my bikes.

you can go plop down under 15 grand and get a high 9, low 10 second bike stock off the show room floor. In the 4 wheeled world there isn't anything under two hundred grand even close except heavily modified cars.

Do you think you can drive a car to it's full potential?

What traction issues are you talking about? The same physics apply to cars.

All MAV was saying was that he can get his speed kick without resorting to expensive to own and operate turbo cars.
The question was geared towards Marvik on whether he could run 11s on his bike. Which it seems like he doesn't have 11 sec timeslip to back it up. Yes, the bike is capable of 11s but a BIKE is limited to the abilities of the rider.

When the snow clears I would be down for a "friendly" DIG race on the street for a 1/4 mile stretch against your aprilla without you on the bottle heads up race in mexico! Can't run at the track because I'll get the boot in one run.

Just because you pull low 11s high 10s at the track doesn't mean you pull that on the street thus where you can potentially run into "traction issues".

Back on topic IMO it was a waste to purchase the N/A BRZ when the turbo version was coming soon.

IMO I prefer a fast car over a fast bike! If anything went wrong I much rather be in a car than a bike!
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
EvoChArGeR is offline   Reply With Quote