Originally Posted by stevehnm
You must have a short (or selective) memory.
There have been at least 3 magazine reviews posted *here* where they talk about the weak mpg's (and most don't keep the car long enough to do their own checking), not to mention the statistical analyses that have been done and shown here comparing the difference in real world vs. claimed mpg. You've been pointed to them before - I don't feel like going back and getting links from here that you have already been shown and decided to forget or ignore.
But, you continue to spread your falsehoods about the cvt, when you don't even have one. Why don't you talk about something you know about instead?
Your theory is not getting any better despite the number of times you continue to repeat it.
Funny how Subaru engineered the car to excell in the EPA tests, but suck in everyday driving, yet all these different professional reviewers praise the car. Yes, professional reviews, not your lame opinion repeated as if it is fact.
Maybe you need to watch the Consumer Reports and some of the other reviews again: