View Single Post
Old 02-07-2013, 03:18 PM   #38
Ziggyrama
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 53665
Join Date: Jan 2004
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Northboro, MA
Vehicle:
2011 STI Stg2 w/EBCS
2012 Tribeca Ltd.

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jthatch12 View Post
I'm totally going to build that gauge for my capstone project next semester.

Anyway back on topic, is the sampling rate of SD logging significantly slower in comparison to normal logging?
You got it reversed. SD logging is significantly faster than normal logging. The sampling rate is still tied to the number of parameters but it is MUCH faster. To give you an idea, I am collecting 15 counters and I get about 35 samples per second, where 1 of the counters requires extensive calculations (those slow it down). So, I am running slower than normal 15 counters would. Normal logging can't touch that kind of rate.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Ziggyrama is offline   Reply With Quote