Everyone except flyboy1100 appeared able to understand what was going on. Nobody else voted more than 3 times, which would be the normal thing to do. flyboy1100 voted 7 times. So, I took out his entries and re-ran the numbers. Here are the new answers:
A couple of things pop out. One is that the numbers are surprisingly close to the EPA estimates - only reversed. That is, within one mpg, all of the answers to our little poll here match the other transmission. The other thing is that applying the range difference, the MT5 appears to fall within the variability of the "other 12" in the CVT Problem thread.
I guess it's no wonder the MT5 people were saying the complaints of the CVT people were in our imagination - they're getting our numbers!!! (that's what they said when they were being nice anyway).