Originally Posted by stevehnm
A moving target eh? No, because I've reported over 45 mpg (at 50-55 mph) and I don't recall anyone reporting over those.
Which just shows you that it's how you drive, so these anecdotes are irrelevant. I'm not going to waste my time.
And your explanation for why the top ranges of combined MPG's on fuelly (33-34mpg) are only CVT equipped cars is?
Ah, now that data is suspect as well, lol