View Single Post
Old 10-30-2004, 02:00 PM   #95
Ineedapurpleone
Visiting NASIOC Timeout
 
Member#: 40905
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hamden, CT (yep here)
Vehicle:
2005 Legacy GT
Red, Tan leather interior

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmitrik4
but it IS a legal argument. i used the phrase "knew or should have known" b/c that is exactly the language that is used in the case law regarding misrepresentation by a seller.

it could also be looked as a "mistake" if the dealer really thought the car had ABS, but Sec. 154 lead sme to believe the dealer, rather than the buyer, bears the risk of the mistake.
I said the dealership wasn't right in misrepresenting the car but they didn't force him not to ask questions nor to purchase the vehicle. Therefore he had a choice and has no legal case.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Ineedapurpleone is offline   Reply With Quote