Quote:
Originally Posted by dmitrik4
but it IS a legal argument. i used the phrase "knew or should have known" b/c that is exactly the language that is used in the case law regarding misrepresentation by a seller.
it could also be looked as a "mistake" if the dealer really thought the car had ABS, but Sec. 154 lead sme to believe the dealer, rather than the buyer, bears the risk of the mistake.
|
I said the dealership wasn't right in misrepresenting the car but they didn't force him not to ask questions nor to purchase the vehicle. Therefore he had a choice and has no legal case.