Quote:
Originally Posted by bulwnkl
Prices are always changing, but 'classically' magnesium is simply less expensive than calcium, which is the usual alternative, and magnesium 'classically' leaves much harder deposits than calcium.
I must've recollected the specs incorrectly. I had recalled that the last spec or two tightened wear control requirements noticeably. Not directly, but by making the test tougher while keeping the wear limit the same. Am I thinking of a different spec?
|
Ahh, so that's probably why RT6 is so cheap.
Wear control for GF5 appears to be the same.
http://www.gf-5.com/the_story/performance/
-Dennis