View Single Post
Old 09-09-2013, 11:39 PM   #2
Back Road Runner
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 60082
Join Date: Apr 2004
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Minnesota
Vehicle:
2004 Forester STI
Silver

Default

You will just need to weigh the cost vs buying another car.

Frankly, the raw parts are likely not all that expensive. The harder part will be either (a) finding time to do the work on the car or (b) paying a significant amount extra in labor cost to have someone else do it for you.

Buying a 2002 Forester may not be much better depending on the condition of the vehicle. I've got a 2002 Forester that has a pile of issues too. The subframe is certainly rusty, the engine seals and pistons need refreshing, and I just spent money on the transmission. Old cars cost money, and that money often becomes pretty continuous. You might spend $2000 a year to keep it running. It will run a long time doing so, but you need to weigh the hassle associated with the work, the inconvenience if it's your only car, and the cost per year versus a newer car without repair costs but a sizable car loan. What ends up being more cost effective? Old cars can be less costly if you can do the work yourself, but there is the investment of time. Newer cars give you a lot of trouble free years where you don't have to do a single thing with the car besides change oil. For many, that alone carries significant worth.

In the end it's your choice.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Back Road Runner is offline   Reply With Quote