Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Wednesday April 16, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > News & Rumors > Non-Subaru News & Rumors

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2007, 06:37 PM   #1
NYCshopper
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 5126
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: www.nugateway.com
Default Senator Hillary Clinton proposes "Mandatory Back-Up Cameras?"

Senator Hillary Clinton proposes "Mandatory Back-Up Cameras?"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...022701560.html



Quote:
Lawmakers Push for Auto Safety Upgrades

WASHINGTON -- Lawmakers and safety advocates called for new auto safety upgrades Tuesday that would require rearview cameras for drivers and power windows that automatically reverse as a way to protect children around vehicles.

"None of us wants to _ as we each have done _ meet with another family who has lost a child, in what is clearly a preventable death," said Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., who outlined legislation that would force automakers to provide the improvements.

Called the Cameron Gulbransen Kids and Cars Safety Act, the measure is named after a 2-year-old New York boy who was accidentally run over and killed by his father as he backed out his sport utility vehicle in 2002.

Kids and Cars, a Kansas-based safety group supporting the bill, estimated that about two children are killed and 48 injured every week because of back-over accidents. Family members are typically behind the wheel, they said.

Under the measure, which has failed in past years, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration would require equipment alerting drivers to children and other objects behind the vehicle, prevent a vehicle from rolling when parked and make power windows reverse direction to address some children who have been strangled to death.

The federal safety agency also would be required to improve its collection of data involving "nontraffic, noncrash injuries" involving children. The bill is backed by Sen. John Sununu, R-N.H., and Reps. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., and Peter King, R-N.Y.

Many luxury vehicles have the technologies and other vehicles offer them as optional equipment. Parents and safety advocates said the improvements could run more than $350 per vehicle.

NHTSA has estimated that back-over accidents led to 183 deaths annually and about 7,400 injuries.

Automakers have opposed mandating the upgrades, noting that many of the safety features are available for consumers as an option. A government report last November also found that many of the cameras face limitations and their performance can vary depending on weather conditions.

"Such technology does show promise, though more research and development could help them better identify objects, especially at night and in inclement weather," said Gloria Bergquist, a spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.

The industry has agreed to provide brake-shift interlock equipment that requires the driver to engage the brake to shift the vehicle out of park. Automakers have pledged to install the devices on all vehicles by 2010.

Others have stressed the importance of walking around the vehicle before moving it. But some parents whose children have been injured or killed in backovers said a simple check is not always the best prevention.

"We can supervise our children to the best of our ability, but anybody who has ever met a child knows that they are unpredictable at best," said Sue Auriemma, of Manhasset, N.Y.

Auriemma's young daughter, Kate, was seriously injured after she accidentally backed over her in May 2005. Auriemma said moments before the accident, she had looked behind her car "but my daughter slipped out of the house in a second and behind my vehicle before I knew it."

NYCshopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 06:50 PM   #2
Kostamojen
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 2272
Join Date: Sep 2000
Chapter/Region: BAIC
Location: haha XD
Vehicle:
2013 Subaru 599 :P
Galaxy Blue Sexy

Default

Does that include free NAV systems on all cars too???
Kostamojen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 07:10 PM   #3
Hazdaz
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 14611
Join Date: Jan 2002
Default

I wanna know why we still have side mirrors?

For years and years now concept cars have had cameras on the sides and a screen on the inside instead. It probably would reduce drag - and help fuel economy - dramatically if you didn't have 2 big fat mirrors sticking out the sides of your car.
Hazdaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 04:00 AM   #4
drees
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 25905
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: San Diego, CA
Vehicle:
2003 Silver Wagon
Tuned with Enginuity

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazdaz View Post
I wanna know why we still have side mirrors?

For years and years now concept cars have had cameras on the sides and a screen on the inside instead. It probably would reduce drag - and help fuel economy - dramatically if you didn't have 2 big fat mirrors sticking out the sides of your car.
I'm all for cameras and screens instead of side mirrors. How many productions cars have this as an option?

I'm against mandatory rear view cameras. I hate unnecessary legislation. Hillary seems to propose a lot of things that fall into this category.
drees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 05:18 AM   #5
wherethefmi
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 124318
Join Date: Aug 2006
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Fort Lewis WA
Vehicle:
1989 Taurus SHO
Oxford White

Default

+1 for sideview cameras, -1 for mandatory rearview cameras, unless hillary is paying for it herself, and i'll take a side of nav and dvd player on a 7'' display with that!!!
wherethefmi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 05:56 AM   #6
Mopho
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 32334
Join Date: Jan 2003
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: Suitcase-my stuff lives in LA
Vehicle:
05 Outback
Caterham 7 Superlight R

Default

Big deal! It won't be long before most cars will have them anyway, legislation or not. Many luxury cars and SUV's have them already. They are actually pretty cool, especially the ones on Mercedes and Audi's that show your trajectory as well.

I also like on the Audi Q7 how it has a light on the mirrors that indicate when a vehicle is in your blind spot
Mopho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:08 AM   #7
registering
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 89332
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Vehicle:
2007 Miata
Silver

Default

I agree, Hillary pisses me off with her "think of the children" knee-jerk reactions. Rather than educate people to drive better and raise driving test standards (I know, it's a state thing), she wants to force technology down folks' throats, which of course raises the price of all cars.

I thought the LF-A was going to be built sans sideview mirrors, since its concept form had little cameras out the sides. Sadly, the preproduction shows sideview mirrors.
registering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 03:50 AM   #8
dodiox
Visiting NASIOC Timeout
 
Member#: 85718
Join Date: Apr 2005
Vehicle:
06 WRX
Cobb Stage 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drees View Post
I'm all for cameras and screens instead of side mirrors. How many productions cars have this as an option?

I'm against mandatory rear view cameras. I hate unnecessary legislation. Hillary seems to propose a lot of things that fall into this category.
Its called cost reductions and reliability of safety feature.
First of all if you have cameras and screens instead of a simple inexpensive mirror that is ADDED cost that YOU will end up paying for.
besides if the cameras stop working you are screwed while mirrors never stop working.
simple things are always better.
electronics are cool but the more you put into q car the bigger chances you have for something to fail.
dodiox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 11:37 AM   #9
WRXHillClimb
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 206907
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Abq, NM
Vehicle:
2014 EvoX GSR
2005 S2000 Track Car

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drees View Post
I'm all for cameras and screens instead of side mirrors. How many productions cars have this as an option?

I'm against mandatory rear view cameras. I hate unnecessary legislation. Hillary seems to propose a lot of things that fall into this category.
Liberal and progressive. Yeah, sounds about right. Just make sure she never gets any real positions of power...
WRXHillClimb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 01:02 PM   #10
Calamity Jesus
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 44501
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: in a minefield of caddishness.
Vehicle:
1984 "Skeletor from
"He-Man"

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazdaz View Post
I wanna know why we still have side mirrors?
Probably because they're simple, cheap and reliable... not to mention, that they're extremely functional, since you can glance at the driver's side mirror and check your blind spot in one quick head movement.

Quote:
For years and years now concept cars have had cameras on the sides and a screen on the inside instead. It probably would reduce drag - and help fuel economy - dramatically if you didn't have 2 big fat mirrors sticking out the sides of your car.
Fuel economy lost by drag from mirrors is a drop in the bucket. If they are so bad for drag, why isn't F1 using rear-view cameras already?

----

I'm all for backup cameras, airbags, seatbelts, helmets, etc.. but I'm against anyone legislating any of them as mandatory for everyone.
Calamity Jesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 12:44 PM   #11
Unit 91
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 15810
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ride the Revolution™
Vehicle:
2007 Mazda Fastar
2009 Legacy

Default

I have a back-up camera, but I still twist around in my seat when I back up. Just because you have a camera doesn't mean you can see everything. It's good as an additional view, but by no means a completely accurate tool.

Mandatory? lame.
Unit 91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 01:03 PM   #12
KC
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 442
Join Date: Oct 1999
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: SE Mass/RI
Vehicle:
2013 Crosstrek XV
00 Honda S2000

Default

I have back up sensors... works great on little childrens... I know when to speed up.
KC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 01:28 PM   #13
ringe
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 49998
Join Date: Dec 2003
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Vehicle:
2007 WRX CT Stg 2
WRB

Default

Backup cameras are great for large SUVs or other vehicles with large blind-spots, but even then most of them have a screwed-up aspect that makes it hard to tell where things are in relation to the vehicle, and like others have said, cameras by themselves aren't enough. People still need to just pay attention to what is going on around them and look to see what is back there, whether they have a camera or not.
ringe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 01:48 PM   #14
shemoves
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 80663
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: Glendale, AZ
Vehicle:
1997 Outback

Default

As of now, I am for it (don't know the 'whole story'). The fact of the matter is, a person can walk around a vehicle as many times as they want, but when they step into the driver's seat...that small area directly behind the car is a permanent blindspot. Someone could theoretically check behind the car, walk bacwards whilst watching the rear section, hop in, and immediately continue checking the rear though. It is true that better driver training/requirements (which I am also for) can only go so far.

It does not make sense to me that we can freely operate 3,000+ lb (even greater size/weight/blindspots with SUVs (which are especially common with families)) vehicles, and so frequently use that blinded area.

If the stats are correct, it could theoritcally save money. Less accidents means less strain on public service. Time could be saved because the 'back up procedure' would take less time.

Some things I would; however, want is that the camera(s) either cover a very large area behind the car, including 'looking down the lanes' to the left and right such that a person can rely completely on the system, or, look only at the small blindspot area (with some overlap) such that people don't get a false sense of security from it.

In fact, an 'all emcompassing' camera setup could make driving much safer. We could turn the rear view mirror area into a set of screens that utilize a series of cameres to show a sort of 'panorama' shot around the sides/rear of the car. Camera locations: standard side mirrors, C-pillar (looking in the direction of the common 'blindspot'), top/rear/center of the hood, and the bottom/center of the bumper (this one may actually be better mounted somewhere near the rear diff).

A less complicated setup could just make little camera 'pods' mounted inside the car where the cameras just look out the rear window.

With this setup, someone would only have to look to one location for all 'rear view' info, allowing for more time with eyes forward, and greatly reducing the effect of someone moving into one area while you are looking at another. Last but not least...when cars have it, so will semi trucks and fleet vehicles with 'boarded up' windows.

I understand the 'laissez fair' idea, but there is a proper balance between anarchy and dictatorship. I think this falls in the middle as the potential benefit greatly outweighs the cost.
shemoves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 01:52 PM   #15
shemoves
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 80663
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: Glendale, AZ
Vehicle:
1997 Outback

Default

repost -delete-
shemoves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:00 PM   #16
Ghosthound
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 110979
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Vehicle:
2010 FJ Cruiser
1999 Miata

Default

this is ridiculous... i dont want to be forced into buying a car with a backup camera. It will just add to the price of cars. the benefit of safety from these things isnt going to be that significant... how many people actually get run over by cars backing up anyway??

whats next? "all cars must automatically parallel park"
Ghosthound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:12 PM   #17
dexterous
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 23553
Join Date: Aug 2002
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: Slippery Rock, PA
Vehicle:
2005 STI - WRB
2014 WRX - Silver

Default

She is an idiot democrat, what the hell do you expect?
dexterous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 08:20 PM   #18
99subi
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 78118
Join Date: Dec 2004
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: Westchester NY
Vehicle:
2002 Corvette coupe
05 Legacy

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dexterous View Post
She is an idiot democrat, what the hell do you expect?
exactly
99subi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 11:40 AM   #19
WRXHillClimb
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 206907
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Abq, NM
Vehicle:
2014 EvoX GSR
2005 S2000 Track Car

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by christinejoyB View Post
The law mandated that the Department of Transportation come up with a rule by Feb. 28, 2011, which was delayed by Transportation Secretary Roy LaHood until December and again until Feb. 28, 2012. Each time, Secretary LaHood cited inadequate data existing to come up with a solution. The latest idea, which was supposed to be given as the official recommendation, was to mandate that all car makers install back-up cameras in all models sold in the U.S. However, the recommendation has been delayed again.
It better never ****ing come into existence. I'm not paying to have stupid people **** on my car because your average driver is like my girlfriend's friend sucks (who should not even own a license... seriously who gets so anxious when driving that they think a guarded left hand turn lane from the OTHER DIRECTION is a left hand turn lane?). Tired of people thinking legislation to try and force people into this ideal citizen mold is a good thing.
WRXHillClimb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 12:27 PM   #20
woody06967
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 110330
Join Date: Mar 2006
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: Canandaigua, NY
Vehicle:
2007 STI Limited
2012 MDX & Golf TDI

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WRXHillClimb View Post
It better never ****ing come into existence. I'm not paying to have stupid people **** on my car because your average driver is like my girlfriend's friend sucks (who should not even own a license... seriously who gets so anxious when driving that they think a guarded left hand turn lane from the OTHER DIRECTION is a left hand turn lane?). Tired of people thinking legislation to try and force people into this ideal citizen mold is a good thing.
You're aware of rearview mirrors, side mirrors, seatbelts, airbags, emergency brakes, crumple zones, and the other 34789789345 safety items that are mandated on your car already right?

Also, wow this thread is old.
woody06967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 12:44 PM   #21
SubaDuba420
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 102793
Join Date: Dec 2005
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Vehicle:
2008 STi
DGM

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woody06967 View Post
You're aware of rearview mirrors, side mirrors, seatbelts, airbags, emergency brakes, crumple zones, and the other 34789789345 safety items that are mandated on your car already right?
the wrxhill is hardcore, he drive a go-kart, YO
SubaDuba420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 01:23 PM   #22
delongedoug
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 124113
Join Date: Aug 2006
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: To infinity
Vehicle:
and beyond!

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woody06967 View Post
You're aware of rearview mirrors, side mirrors, seatbelts, airbags, emergency brakes, crumple zones, and the other 34789789345 safety items that are mandated on your car already right?

Also, wow this thread is old.
Why are cars getting such bad gas mileage? We keep mandating they add weight, lets mandate higher fuel economy at the same time!
delongedoug is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 09:31 AM   #23
bWRX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 6672
Join Date: May 2001
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: murland
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dexterous View Post
She is an idiot democrat, what the hell do you expect?
She's actually more in line with Republican views and ideals. I guess you're right, that's the "idiot" part. It is also why most of the current Democractic base won't vote for her, just the usual anti-gun nanny state people.
bWRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 10:21 PM   #24
Mike Wevrick
RIP 1/19/64 - 7/23/11
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 24654
Join Date: Sep 2002
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: saraseager.com
Vehicle:
1957 Taggart Comet
atlasshruggedpart1.com

Default

Another reason not to vote for her.

Quote:
"We can supervise our children to the best of our ability, but anybody who has ever met a child knows that they are unpredictable at best," said Sue Auriemma, of Manhasset, N.Y.

Auriemma's young daughter, Kate, was seriously injured after she accidentally backed over her in May 2005. Auriemma said moments before the accident, she had looked behind her car "but my daughter slipped out of the house in a second and behind my vehicle before I knew it."
Statements like this drive me crazy. We need better parenting, not more mandatory electronic nannies. I have 2 small kids (1 and 3). I do not move the car unless I know exactly where they are--eg in their car seats or where I can see them and another adult is supervising them. If your kid is not old enough to know to stay out of the way of cars, they are not old enough to be left unsupervised outside or where they can get out of the house.
Mike Wevrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 12:24 AM   #25
lethal.adv
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 95652
Join Date: Sep 2005
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: Northern NJ
Vehicle:
'12 Outback 2.5i
'10 Legacy 2.5i ltd.

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Wevrick View Post
Statements like this drive me crazy. We need better parenting, not more mandatory electronic nannies. I have 2 small kids (1 and 3). I do not move the car unless I know exactly where they are--eg in their car seats or where I can see them and another adult is supervising them. If your kid is not old enough to know to stay out of the way of cars, they are not old enough to be left unsupervised outside or where they can get out of the house.
+1 I completely agree.
lethal.adv is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wireless LCD Back-up Camera Kit WRX Loki Interior/Dressup/Audio & Security 3 12-10-2009 03:52 PM
FS: Back up camera for your TV screen wrxSTIcy NWIC Private Classifieds 11 06-09-2009 03:16 PM
spec B back up camera? Chris N Legacy Forum 3 08-25-2008 08:32 PM
Back Up Camera Jake2006 Car Audio, Video & Security 2 10-17-2006 01:27 PM
Who would vote for Hillary Clinton? archer Off-Topic 82 12-26-2002 08:52 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.