Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Wednesday September 28, 2016
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > News & Rumors

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads. 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2012, 11:40 AM   #1
banyan
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 181013
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 👹👹👹
Subaru Stars 2013 Subaru Outback/Legacy


Last edited by banyan; 04-04-2012 at 07:26 PM. Reason: post link
banyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 11:41 AM   #2
grzydj
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 84984
Join Date: Apr 2005
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Vehicle:
2006 Impreza 2.5i 5D
'04 Toyota Tacoma TRD

Default

Any substantial engine changes, or is it still rocking the EJ series? Any plans for it to have an FB engine?
grzydj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:23 PM   #3
banyan
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 181013
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 👹👹👹
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grzydj View Post
Any substantial engine changes, or is it still rocking the EJ series? Any plans for it to have an FB engine?
According to lgt.com source, the only things that have changed are - the interior, headlights, grill and bumper. So, they will probably continue to use EJ engine.
banyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:46 PM   #4
Karl in MN
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 30570
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Vehicle:
2012 Impreza Limited
White

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banyan View Post
According to lgt.com source, the only things that have changed are - the interior, headlights, grill and bumper. So, they will probably continue to use EJ engine.
Any additional info on the interior changes? Substantial?
Karl in MN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 11:43 AM   #5
banyan
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 181013
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 👹👹👹
Thumbs down

The new rims make wheels look smaller
banyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 11:59 AM   #6
Juege
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 37088
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Switzerland
Vehicle:
2004 Outback 2.5 i m
silver

Default

The "boomerang" in the headligts is probably for der daytime running ligths? At least in Europe.
Juege is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:11 PM   #7
NASIOC Vendor
 
Member#: 67
Join Date: Jul 1999
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: San Diego, CA
Vehicle:
1999 Outlasting
the competition.

Default

I see the outback has larger fog holes.
tom@kartboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:27 PM   #8
NASIOC Vendor
 
Member#: 67
Join Date: Jul 1999
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: San Diego, CA
Vehicle:
1999 Outlasting
the competition.

Default

Looks like i need to go drive the TSX wagon instead... Bring back the legacy wagon. not these bloated boats.
tom@kartboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:49 PM   #9
MrH
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 186279
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phila, PA
Vehicle:
2016 Forester XT
Ice Silver

Default

Can't understand Subaru's thinking.
Whats the point of having two 2.5 N/A engines?
The FB is a better engine.
Why not just drop it in the Leggy and be done with it?
MrH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 01:04 PM   #10
ocellaris
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 302559
Join Date: Nov 2011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrH View Post
Can't understand Subaru's thinking.
Whats the point of having two 2.5 N/A engines?
The FB is a better engine.
Why not just drop it in the Leggy and be done with it?
If they stick with the EJ, it will be because the FB doesn't fit as a drop in replacement and they don't want to retool the engine bay for a car that is getting replaced in ~2 years with an all new model. Also FB CVT may be a fitment issue.

I don't mind the EJ, aside from the fact that is uses a timing belt which makes for a costly replacement every 75K miles Real world MPG between the EJ and the DB doesn't seem to differ by much.

Last edited by ocellaris; 03-28-2012 at 01:17 PM.
ocellaris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 01:25 PM   #11
HipToBeSquare
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 119958
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: (IA) flyover cornfield country
Vehicle:
1992 SVX LS-L

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ocellaris View Post
If they stick with the EJ, it will be because the FB doesn't fit as a drop in replacement and they don't want to retool the engine bay for a car that is getting replaced in ~2 years with an all new model. Also FB CVT may be a fitment issue.

I don't mind the EJ, aside from the fact that is uses a timing belt which makes for a costly replacement every 75K miles Real world MPG between the EJ and the DB doesn't seem to differ by much.

What about an FB25 makes it a non-drop-in replacement for the EJ25 NA motor?

They DID THAT ALREADY, The 2009-10 Forester had EJ. The 2011-current Forester, SAME BODY, has the FB, directly. The SH Forester didn't get a big press hoopla party for that, and nothing else visible from the outside of the vehicle changed. The internal structure didn't change. Aside from maybe wheel design, it would be very hard to tell a 2010 Forester X from a 2011 Forester X, but the engine did change from EJ25 to FB25.

The 2010 Legacy/Outback debuted an engine-cradle arrangment. The engine cradle was meant to offer modularity as to which Subaru engine fits in that chassis.

There is pretty much a ZERO percent chance that the '10 Legacy Engine cradle design was designed to preclude the FB engine fitment, as the FB engine was on the docket for 2011, in the Forester, and has been planned to entirely replace the EJ engine line.

The FB25 has DOHC, and DUAL AVCS, where EJ atmospheric engine does not, and FB25 has a little bit more torque. The FB is also likely designed to accept direct fuel injection at some point, and Legacy/Outback is likely to recieve that before Impreza does, because Legacy/Outback is a better featured, higher margin, higher price point vehicle.

I don't think there is a single thing that makes a problem for dropping an FB25 under the hood of a Legacy or Outback. Legacy GT has a low front turbo, so the front-wrap exhaust is designed similarly, and will fit.

The FB25 Forester uses the age-old Subaru 5-speed manual, and 4-speed auto... it bolts to the same transmissions. It bolts to the same engine mounts, and is likely designed for easy use with the engine cradle, as mentioned.

Last edited by HipToBeSquare; 03-28-2012 at 01:33 PM.
HipToBeSquare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 01:57 PM   #12
grzydj
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 84984
Join Date: Apr 2005
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Vehicle:
2006 Impreza 2.5i 5D
'04 Toyota Tacoma TRD

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HipToBeSquare View Post

I don't think there is a single thing that makes a problem for dropping an FB25 under the hood of a Legacy or Outback.
I don't think there is either. Maybe Subaru just wants to finish up this run of Outbacks with its current configuration and migrate over to a new engine/trans combo with the next model. Maybe the economy of scale metrics don't work out to pay for changes to line production in the US or something.

It's strange that they did it mid-model on the Forester though. Maybe because it is built in Japan?

It is a bit baffling to say the least.
grzydj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 10:43 PM   #13
JustyWRC
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 153088
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arlington, TN
Vehicle:
2005 Baja Turbo
06 Forester 04 Forester

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HipToBeSquare View Post
What about an FB25 makes it a non-drop-in replacement for the EJ25 NA motor?


The 2010 Legacy/Outback debuted an engine-cradle arrangment. The engine cradle was meant to offer modularity as to which Subaru engine fits in that chassis.

There is pretty much a ZERO percent chance that the '10 Legacy Engine cradle design was designed to preclude the FB engine fitment, as the FB engine was on the docket for 2011, in the Forester, and has been planned to entirely replace the EJ engine line.


The FB25 Forester uses the age-old Subaru 5-speed manual, and 4-speed auto... it bolts to the same transmissions. It bolts to the same engine mounts, and is likely designed for easy use with the engine cradle, as mentioned.
The engine cradle was more for the transmission. The CVT is considerably larger than the other transmissions. It also allowed better engine mount placement for less vibration.
JustyWRC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:51 PM   #14
grzydj
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 84984
Join Date: Apr 2005
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Vehicle:
2006 Impreza 2.5i 5D
'04 Toyota Tacoma TRD

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post
Looks like i need to go drive the TSX wagon instead... Bring back the legacy wagon. not these bloated boats.
The Legacy wagons that nobody bought. I totally agree with you though. On that subject, there was a thread floating around here a while ago where Subaru built a concept GT Touring Wagon, with a 1.6 liter with a turbo and a hybrid. Pure concept, but on the right track to wagon goodness.
grzydj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 01:01 PM   #15
SoDealer
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 67960
Join Date: Aug 2004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post
Looks like i need to go drive the TSX wagon instead... Bring back the legacy wagon. not these bloated boats.
TSX wagon is longer and wider than an Outback or Legacy. Bloat indeed.
SoDealer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 01:04 PM   #16
HipToBeSquare
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 119958
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: (IA) flyover cornfield country
Vehicle:
1992 SVX LS-L

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoDealer View Post
TSX wagon is longer and wider than an Outback or Legacy. Bloat indeed.
Wow, I wouldn't have thought that.

TSX is supposed to be smaller than TL and smaller than Accord as it is sold as the Accord in other markets outside of North America,

Plus, Legacy/Outback grew significantly in 2010 for this body style... I would have figured the current Legacy/Outback would be closer to TL in size, and larger than TSX...

Bloat indeed.
HipToBeSquare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 06:35 PM   #17
DrD
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 22412
Join Date: Aug 2002
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Vehicle:
2012 Legacy 2.5GT
Ice Silver Metallic

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HipToBeSquare View Post
Plus, Legacy/Outback grew significantly in 2010 for this body style...
not really - the transition from old design (2009) to current (2010) was a whopping 55 lbs gain in weight from the 2009 (for the LGT) and it grew longer by a whole half an inch, as well as gaining 3 inches in width and height.

Not sure about the changes/face lift for the 2013 - the headlights which are partially blacked out and have the LED thing like the BRZ are nice, but the bumper looks odd (larger protrusions in the corners, and the foglights are pushed forward from the bumper with a chrome trim ring, without really making them larger - they look sort of odd. The new grille looks alot like the Impreza (I thought the 2010-2012 looked nicer) - still haven't seen any interior details, though...
DrD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 04:57 PM   #18
NASIOC Vendor
 
Member#: 67
Join Date: Jul 1999
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: San Diego, CA
Vehicle:
1999 Outlasting
the competition.

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoDealer View Post
TSX wagon is longer and wider than an Outback or Legacy. Bloat indeed.
not by much ~1"
I'm referring to the super high ride height and awful mushy suspension. I heard rumors that they are going stiffer suspension along with bigger bars to help with the shakes at speed.


http://www.edmunds.com/car-compariso...atorId=3583615
tom@kartboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:55 PM   #19
HipToBeSquare
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 119958
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: (IA) flyover cornfield country
Vehicle:
1992 SVX LS-L

Default

The headlights are a little better, by being less overwhelming bling... but don't fix the car's aesthetic boringness compared to my BL Legacy sedan

The wheels on the Outback are more striking than anything... Three bold polished spokes, in front of three other background thin spokes... Not sure if I like the design... but I can't say it is boring like the BRZ and Impreza OE wheels lately.

Come to think of it... I wonder what those 3-over-3 Outback wheels would look like on a BRZ... The BRZ wheels are way too busy looking. 06-07 WRX 7-spoke wheels would also look good on there, and probably Subaru's best looking OE 5x100 wheels in a while. But it is entirely more likely to put aftermarket staggered width wheels on the BRZ, rather than swapping for other Subaru OE wheels.

The Legacy's wheels look almost exactly like Hyundai wheels on the new Genesis Coupe, almost down to the contouring on the spokes. Different PCD, though, obviously.


Regarding the engine: Unless the specs are released, or there are under hood photos, it would be impossible to tell from the outside that the engine would be changed or not.

It would be interesting if Forester's FB25 NA engine replaced the base EJ25 NA engine.

If they were to unfortunately discontinue the slow-selling and order-only Legacy GT... there wouldn't be cam belt to be found on ANY of the 2013 Legacy/Outback, or Tribeca if it survives.

With the Impreza's use of the FB NA engines now... cutting them from Legacy/Outback would pretty much put the naturally-aspirated EJ lineup to bed entirely.

Only the current Forester XT, and WRX/STI motors would be turbo EJs, until the next generation of WRX/STI arrives with the FA/FB based turbo motor debuts, and likely brings the Forester XT along with it, if that survives.

It would be logical for the Legacy/Outback to go FB25 and EZ36 across the line, and a mid-life refresh is as good a time as any.

Last edited by HipToBeSquare; 03-28-2012 at 01:01 PM.
HipToBeSquare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 01:09 PM   #20
banyan
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 181013
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 👹👹👹
Thumbs down SOA ninjas are in action

SOA ninjas are in action The member on lgt.com deleted all his posts
banyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 04:19 PM   #21
Snow Drift
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 75071
Join Date: Nov 2004
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: NYC
Vehicle:
4 Train - Subway
Past: 05, 08, 11 Red WRXs

Default

I have seen the images, and they are glorious!

The front end of the Legacy is more aggresive and looks more like a mix of the ROW '10-11 Legacy and the Legacy Tuned by STI. But the grill is bigger (the new Subaru trend a la Advanced Tourer Concept...but not THAT big)


Snow Drift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2012, 07:49 PM   #22
alphaomega0
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 147678
Join Date: Apr 2007
Chapter/Region: E. Canada
Location: montreal
Vehicle:
07 wrx
obsidien black

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow Drift View Post
I have seen the images, and they are glorious!

The front end of the Legacy is more aggresive and looks more like a mix of the ROW '10-11 Legacy and the Legacy Tuned by STI. But the grill is bigger (the new Subaru trend a la Advanced Tourer Concept...but not THAT big)


would take the second one over the first one any given day, what a horror show the new lg has become. so fat so ugly so lame
alphaomega0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2012, 06:14 PM   #23
Eyeflyistheeye
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 69694
Join Date: Sep 2004
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: My personal hell
Vehicle:
2014 EuroPinto 5MT

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow Drift View Post
I have seen the images, and they are glorious!
Yes, indeed. All hail before your new god.



Eyeflyistheeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2012, 06:34 PM   #24
JustyWRC
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 153088
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arlington, TN
Vehicle:
2005 Baja Turbo
06 Forester 04 Forester

Default

Really?
JustyWRC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2012, 08:40 PM   #25
Snow Drift
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 75071
Join Date: Nov 2004
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: NYC
Vehicle:
4 Train - Subway
Past: 05, 08, 11 Red WRXs

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eyeflyistheeye View Post
Yes, indeed. All hail before your new god
You really don't like it?
Snow Drift is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS : OEM Tail light set for 2003-2009 Subaru Outback, Legacy and Liberty models. Like new Loscocco Exterior/Styling 0 10-13-2010 09:27 PM
1997 Subaru Outback Legacy johnowilson Newbies & FAQs 3 11-24-2008 10:25 AM
New Husky Liners Floormats Subaru Outback Legacy Wrx jtsimaras Interior/Dressup/Audio & Security 3 03-13-2007 02:56 PM
1999 Subaru Outback Legacy AWD Wagon whitetoast Private Vehicle 'For Sale' Classifieds 1 09-02-2005 08:43 PM
Subaru Outback Legacy for Sale in Virginia Beach cloudbrk Mid Atlantic Impreza Club -- MAIC 3 07-05-2004 01:20 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2016 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2016, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.