|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|||||||




![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#26 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 71875
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montana
Vehicle:98 2.5GT my wheels fit |
For a good budget setup: 2.5 pan, Killer B pickup.
For a better, more expensive setup: Killer B pan and pickup. There's not really any reason to consider anything else.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 156861
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Vehicle:2002 Wagon mbp, evo3/e85 |
Thread necropsy. and hijacking.
I'm building a ej22t with s20 heads for a little tube frame car. I have room to design whatever I like, so I was going to modify an OEM oil pan, sort of like the cosworth pan. So is there any difference between starting with the 2.5 or 2.0 pan? Height for the engine is a big concern, so I want to make the oil pan just about even with the tranny. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
NASIOC Supporter
Member#: 300551
Join Date: Nov 2011
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: mariposa ca.
Vehicle:2002 DD wgn 6 spd 2.1 kel 272's meth 2.5xtr |
I'm not sure what you are doing but the 2.0 pan is more square. Nobody mentioned the dipstick is differant also
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:2005 WRX/STi WRB of course |
Quote:
CHECK OUT THIS LINK FOR A COMPARISON. What is the application? If I have some more background info on the car/setup/application I can give you a direction to head in. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 3687
Join Date: Jan 2001
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: St. Paul, MN
Vehicle:MY99 GF4 JDM 6spd NF Performance |
The WRX 2L oil pan has been the one from back in the day. It's even on the EJ25D. The reason for the change on the STi oil pan is to clear the twinscroll header, which we don't have. Even the NA Subarus have the same pan now because of the design of the na header. Subaru can discontinue the 2L oil pan because it no longer needs to make them when all the newer cars run a header that wraps around under the engine, excluding the front facing turbo models. I wouldn't be surprised if the dealer required you to purchase a package of the newer pan, pickup, and windage tray with dip stick when going to buy a 2L oil pan.
The 2L has good control of oil sloshing around. Fill up the pans with a gallon of water and see how the baffle is placed. It's very open on the STi pan. I don't see issues with oil not being able to get into the pan. The 2L baffle tray is cupped up, but is NOT flush with the pan all around. The heads have little to no issues with oil flowing back through the block into the pan area. In turns of high lateral g-force it doesn't matter how good a pan you have, you'll have to be on the straight for oil to drain back towards the pan area. Both pans are tilted slightly back how it would be on the engine. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 226211
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Europe
Vehicle:2002 impreza WRX JDM blue |
I ahve 02 wrx with original pan on it and I have problems on the track. oil is being collected in right cylinder head and then goes out from breather tubes (I'm lucky I vented all to atmosphere and did not let this oil go in intake tract again), even when I ahve 4.5 liter in the pan (I do say nothing about 5 liter of oil in the pan).
so I see 2.5 oil pan with 2.5 oil pickup can help in that. does any 2.5 oil pan suit my needs? even 2.5 NA engine pan/pickup? I have stock headers also |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 3687
Join Date: Jan 2001
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: St. Paul, MN
Vehicle:MY99 GF4 JDM 6spd NF Performance |
Neither pan will help you in that situation. When you turn oil from the pan will go up and onto the head. That's the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:2005 WRX/STi WRB of course |
Fuji K hit it on the nose. This is why the rest of the world called the sump a 'twin scroll' sump and we here in the states call it an 'STi' sump.
Sloshing is not so as much of an issue as the boxer engine design If you're at that level of performance you should be running an aftermarket setup anyway. Where there is a difference in the two OEM pans, is the baffling.The older 'flat bottom' style pans do not flow oil down into the bottom of the pan nearly as well as the newer style. Oil will go every which way before making its way down and the large bottom gives the oil a lot more room to move around in, even with the baffle. The newer style has a much better flow through baffle design for letting oil make its way down quickly. On top of that the bottom is shaped like a tub to make sure oil in the bottom is always pooled around the pickup. When Subaru changed to the 'twin scroll'/'STi' design they changed more than just clearance for factory EL manifold. Baffling and tub shaped bottom improved oiling performance. It's not uncommon to see starvation (on track) with the older pan design, but while still possible, more difficult with the newer design. Along with the pan design, the pickup and baffle were updated as well. The pickup is less likely to funnel and the baffle is a sligtly better with oil control as well. All these aspects are why we recommend a (older EJ20) car that sees occasional track use to to consider switching to the newer 'STi' design, for improved oiling performance. Beyond occasional track use, a performance high capacity pan will provide and an even higher level of oil safety and performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | ||
|
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:2005 WRX/STi WRB of course |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
One of these days I'm going to get off my butt and do a full on technical Suby oiling system write-up ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 156861
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Vehicle:2002 Wagon mbp, evo3/e85 |
So i'm building a 1500lb car that will be 50/50 track and street. Probably starting off mostly as an autocross car, but built for track days. does that help?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:2005 WRX/STi WRB of course |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 198964
Join Date: Jan 2009
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: south NJ
Vehicle:2004 WRX wgn, built! WRB |
Is the 2.5na(EJ253) pan the same as an STi(EJ257) Pan? Ive got a spare from a parted motor with baffle & pickup..?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 226211
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Europe
Vehicle:2002 impreza WRX JDM blue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 271720
Join Date: Jan 2011
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: NEPA
|
i don't know if any info on the n/a pan in in here, but there is a good pic inside to compare too
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...php?p=27383408 |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 198964
Join Date: Jan 2009
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: south NJ
Vehicle:2004 WRX wgn, built! WRB |
Ill have to shoot a couple pics and compare to the sti one after work.. The difference between turbo & non-turbo pans is ? The pickup looks exactly the same.. Ill put a couple pics up to compare later..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 156861
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Vehicle:2002 Wagon mbp, evo3/e85 |
It's a mid-engine setup with the 5MT converted to fwd, so that it runs the back wheels directly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | ||
|
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:2005 WRX/STi WRB of course |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:2005 WRX/STi WRB of course |
If anyone needs more pics from different angles or whatever let me know. We've got them all here
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 156861
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Vehicle:2002 Wagon mbp, evo3/e85 |
I don't have a crosmember to content with, so I can extend the pan rearward. However, I do plan on a front mounted turbo, a la 2010 LGT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:2005 WRX/STi WRB of course |
Keep in mind how you stretch the pan and the pickup. The STi pan forms a perfect tub keeping oil right at the pickup always. It's got minimal space to slosh around.
By front mount, do you mean rear mount? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 198964
Join Date: Jan 2009
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: south NJ
Vehicle:2004 WRX wgn, built! WRB |
SO.. Heres a couple pics of a Non-Turbo EJ253 2.5NA Oil Pan which looks pretty much like the STi pan.. THis one came from a spun bearing motor so needs to be cleaned out but you get the idea..
![]() ![]() actually it looks just like the '06 STi pan! Excellent.. now to clean this dirty piece out and get some fresh paint on her.. goin on my '06 100mm forged STi build! Stock baffle and covert pickup! Last edited by 99imprezd; 12-12-2012 at 12:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
NASIOC Vendor
Member#: 198281
Join Date: Dec 2008
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Virginia
Vehicle:2005 WRX/STi WRB of course |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: Built Sblock or Lblock 2.0 or 2.5 | Marlons101 | Private 'Wanted' Classifieds | 10 | 06-18-2009 06:23 PM |
| wtb 2.0 or 2.5 block or full motor | addiction | AKIC Private Classifieds | 8 | 03-22-2009 04:18 PM |
| Looking for either 2.0 or 2.5 short block... | serious | Private 'Wanted' Classifieds | 1 | 12-02-2004 05:20 PM |
| Need a pic of a 2.0 or 2.5 DOHC cylinder head | 2003 sedan | Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain | 0 | 11-30-2004 10:36 PM |
| 2.0 or 2.5? | Nuclear3000GT | Newbies & FAQs | 3 | 11-26-2004 10:41 PM |