Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Sunday December 21, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > Proven Power Bragging

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2013, 10:41 AM   #201
manitou
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 193757
Join Date: Nov 2008
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Cedar, MI HP Techs MPS-SSLR2.5
Vehicle:
2006 XTI Limited
OBP, Junior tuned 573WHP

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by juanmedina View Post

What is the static flow of ID1000s at 55psi? because ID1000s at stock base pressure flow like 870cc IIRC.
Their specs state the nominal flow at 3 bar is 1015cc's.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
manitou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 11:08 AM   #202
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
10.9s @ 128mph

Default

From what I've seen online, the consensus is that the ID1000's flow around 900cc's. Most people see very little difference vs. 850cc injectors. But with you're increased base pressure it should have them flowing more like 1000's though.
xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 11:12 AM   #203
juanmedina
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 133146
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SC
Vehicle:
07 FPgreen 7.37@95
WRX VF39+E85 12.0, 121mph

Default

yeah camtuning was one of them they flow about the same as modded dark blue wrx injectors.... So at 55psi the probably flow 1150cc...
juanmedina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2013, 11:21 AM   #204
manitou
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 193757
Join Date: Nov 2008
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Cedar, MI HP Techs MPS-SSLR2.5
Vehicle:
2006 XTI Limited
OBP, Junior tuned 573WHP

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xluben View Post
From what I've seen online, the consensus is that the ID1000's flow around 900cc's. Most people see very little difference vs. 850cc injectors. But with you're increased base pressure it should have them flowing more like 1000's though.
I know when you look at their charts it looks like 900ish at 14v but I'm reading the specs off of their site. At 4 bars its a little over 1000cc at 14v according to their graph. I also think that my motor build, set up and tune has a very high VE for a Subaru and I am making use of all the 58 lb turbo and 1000cc injectors allow me! Junior showed me the VE map when we had it on the dyno last time. It was a beautiful smooth slightly humped ramp with no peaks or valleys!
manitou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 11:17 PM   #205
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
10.9s @ 128mph

Default

Here's another video:


3rd Gear Pull @ 32psi (boost gauge goes wacky above 30psi)
2nd Gear Brake Boost, 3rd, 4th @ 30psi

50-100MPH is ~4 sec for the 3rd Gear Pull
60-130MPH is ~8 sec for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th Pull
xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013, 02:06 AM   #206
STi MAN86
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 287906
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Australia
Vehicle:
2006 STi
Black

Default

This car is just stupidly quick i like it
STi MAN86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 02:05 AM   #207
FuJi K
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 3687
Join Date: Jan 2001
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: St. Paul, MN
Vehicle:
MY99 GF4 JDM 6spd
NF Performance

Default

I hope the track isn't too slippery. Lol
FuJi K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 08:18 AM   #208
juanmedina
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 133146
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SC
Vehicle:
07 FPgreen 7.37@95
WRX VF39+E85 12.0, 121mph

Default

^

Ben I just realized that you are using a smoothing of 6 on your VD graph. Smoothing of 4 will be more comparable to a real dynojet; a smoothing of 6 will underate your power a little bit .
juanmedina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 09:29 AM   #209
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
10.9s @ 128mph

Default

Yeah, the numbers go up a little with smoothing at 4. I didn't want to over-inflate it though.

FYI - With boost in the 30-31psi range I am seeing around 590-600WHP on Virtual Dyno.
xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 06:21 PM   #210
rhinogt
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 314002
Join Date: Mar 2012
Vehicle:
2012 WRX sedan
WRB

Default

My car dreams of one day being this awesome!
rhinogt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 09:03 AM   #211
JMK508
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 115420
Join Date: May 2006
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: Mountains
Vehicle:
Its like a STI.....
but it doesn't break

Default

Great video!!!

The car really pulls hard.
JMK508 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 10:55 AM   #212
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
10.9s @ 128mph

Default

Here is a video that one of my friend's took at the track day last weekend. It was very cold and wet, but it was still a lot of fun. I was on the full ~30psi / ~600WHP tune, but I was still running snow tires. Lots of sliding around, but the car puts the power down surprisingly well in the straights.

I am in the video around 2:15. Just a quick flyby in the back straight (he let me go by). Camera car was probably going about 60mph and just cruising. It's an 09 WRX with a built motor and the stock VF52 on E85.

xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2013, 03:56 PM   #213
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
10.9s @ 128mph

Default

Not much new to report lately (which I think is a good thing!). The car is still running great. Pulls really hard! Running it around 30-31psi now. I usually have it peaking in the 30.Xpsi range. Virtual Dyno is showing in the 580-600WHP range depending on exactly where the boost is. Recently put in the STI driveshaft, rear axles, and R180 rear diff. I'm hoping that's enough to hold it together for a couple passes this summer.

Here's an interesting way to look at how my car has progressed over time

10/21/10: 239WHP / 259WTQ - Stock 2011 WRX
11/18/10: 251WHP / 294WTQ - Stage 1 ProTune
12/19/10: 275WHP / 316WTQ - Stage 2 ProTune
03/05/11: 338WHP / 381WTQ - E85 Tune
09/17/11: 426WHP / 438WTQ - 20G XTR @ 22psi
03/05/12: 463WHP / 468WTQ - 20G XTR @ 27psi
03/22/13: 576WHP / 530WTQ - PTE 6266 @ 29psi

Currently making ~600WHP @ 30-31psi



Thanks to NF Performance for making it go fast!
xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2013, 11:37 PM   #214
Slimsti
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 155696
Join Date: Aug 2007
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: New Jersey
Vehicle:
2007 BLK STI Dom3XTR
415/405 Precision Tuning

Default

That's awesome man. I love the gains over time graph. 600whp must feel like heaven on earth
Slimsti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2013, 11:54 PM   #215
manitou
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 193757
Join Date: Nov 2008
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Cedar, MI HP Techs MPS-SSLR2.5
Vehicle:
2006 XTI Limited
OBP, Junior tuned 573WHP

Default

That is a very interesting graph and progression! Steadily upwards.....But looking at it makes me wonder what's next for you? It seems that you get restless pretty easy! LOL
manitou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 09:30 AM   #216
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
10.9s @ 128mph

Default

Just for fun, here is a plot of VF52, 20G XTR, and PTE 6266 that I never posted:

xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 10:25 AM   #217
Slimsti
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 155696
Join Date: Aug 2007
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: New Jersey
Vehicle:
2007 BLK STI Dom3XTR
415/405 Precision Tuning

Default

I swear to god you are a lunatic with all your charts. lol I love it. You must just always be logging to have all this amazing data. I really wish i would've been more involved with logging all along the way so i could have these types of charts. Sick stuff dude and your car makes me sad, makes me feel so slow.
Slimsti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 10:33 AM   #218
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
10.9s @ 128mph

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slimsti View Post
I swear to god you are a lunatic with all your charts. lol I love it. You must just always be logging to have all this amazing data. I really wish i would've been more involved with logging all along the way so i could have these types of charts. Sick stuff dude and your car makes me sad, makes me feel so slow.
Haha. I am an engineer, so I do love making charts. I really only logged once in a while when I was on open source because it was a bit cumbersome, but not that I have an AP it's pretty easy to do a log at nearly any time. AP is on a vent mount and a 3rd gear pull takes ~4 sec, so it doesn't take long
xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 10:51 AM   #219
mtarr07
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 246990
Join Date: May 2010
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: NOVA
Vehicle:
2010 Wrx

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xluben View Post
Just for fun, here is a plot of VF52, 20G XTR, and PTE 6266 that I never posted:

So, I see that the weights vary as much as 300+ pounds (looks like the 34xx lb ones you forgot to input the driver weight etc). I guess I'd be curious what the hp/ trq would be for the 20g setup if it had the same weight input as the latest setup. Obviously it would be a bit higher. How much? I'm not sure.
mtarr07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 11:02 AM   #220
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
10.9s @ 128mph

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtarr07 View Post

So, I see that the weights vary as much as 300+ pounds (looks like the 34xx lb ones you forgot to input the driver weight etc). I guess I'd be curious what the hp/ trq would be for the 20g setup if it had the same weight input as the latest setup. Obviously it would be a bit higher. How much? I'm not sure.
The lower weight is because it was just me in the car. The rest had Nuke (tuner) in the car as well and the newest one had some added weight for the 6 speed. I have never weighed it but I at least try to be accurate.

The stock turbo E85 setup and the 20G setup were both run on MAP's Dynojet and the result we're nearly identical to what VD said. FYI - 200lbs is about 20-25 HP in VD. I don't recall exactly but it is not applicable to change the weights in the plot above.
xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 11:09 AM   #221
mtarr07
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 246990
Join Date: May 2010
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: NOVA
Vehicle:
2010 Wrx

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xluben View Post
The lower weight is because it was just me in the car. The rest had Nuke (tuner) in the car as well and the newest one had some added weight for the 6 speed. I have never weighed it but I at least try to be accurate.

The stock turbo E85 setup and the 20G setup were both run on MAP's Dynojet and the result we're nearly identical to what VD said. FYI - 200lbs is about 20-25 HP in VD. I don't recall exactly but it is not applicable to change the weights in the plot above.

Gotchya. That explains it then! My bad; you didn't forget anything at all. It was I who assumed it was only you in the car.
mtarr07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 03:17 PM   #222
Nuke209
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 108089
Join Date: Feb 2006
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Minnesota
Vehicle:
2003 WRX
NF Performance

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xluben View Post
The lower weight is because it was just me in the car. The rest had Nuke (tuner) in the car as well and the newest one had some added weight for the 6 speed. I have never weighed it but I at least try to be accurate.
I see someone got fat jokes
Nuke209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 03:30 PM   #223
mtarr07
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 246990
Join Date: May 2010
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: NOVA
Vehicle:
2010 Wrx

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuke209 View Post
I see someone got fat jokes
You're so fat you make inputting weights into Virtual Dyno difficult!

mtarr07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2013, 03:33 PM   #224
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
10.9s @ 128mph

Default

The numbers on my keyboard don't go that high...
xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 01:15 PM   #225
FuJi K
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 3687
Join Date: Jan 2001
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: St. Paul, MN
Vehicle:
MY99 GF4 JDM 6spd
NF Performance

Default

Two weeks
FuJi K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.