Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Tuesday July 29, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > Proven Power Bragging

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2013, 10:29 AM   #1
IA Performance
NASIOC Vendor
 
Member#: 25194
Join Date: Sep 2002
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Boulder, CO
Vehicle:
2008 Forester XT 5mt
Dark Gray

Default Virtual Dyno VS Dynojet graphs within, not monster power, but good comparison

Virtual Dyno has been around for quite a while, but we had a chance to get back to back comparisons of our E-Tune and a dynojet. The numbers aren't exactly the same, but they are darn close (within 4% peak).

Keep in mind, there are many variables that can skew the Virtual Dyno results (road grade, weight in car, etc). For this reason we use it merely as a brief reference point. Weight nor tire compensation were changed on the Virtual Dyno. By doing so showed a larger spread in the power bands (Virtual Dyno more than Dynojet).

Also, this isn't a Bragging Right of how much power the car made. It is to show how the graphs compared.

Car: 2010, WRX, 5speed, Cat'd Turbo Back Exhaust, AEM Cold Air Intake, 92 oct, iA Performance E-Tune.


Stephen@iaperformance.com


* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
IA Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 10:44 AM   #2
juanmedina
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 133146
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SC
Vehicle:
07 FPgreen 7.37@95
WRX VF39+E85 12.0, 121mph

Default

Close enough
juanmedina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 10:44 AM   #3
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2012 Forester 2.5X
2002 WRX Sedan

Default

Looks good. I have also found the Virtual Dyno to be very comparable to a Dynojet. Here are my results:

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=2389720

And the Virtual Dyno plots are very repeatable as long as you careful collect the data logs:

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&postcount=439
xluben is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 12:04 PM   #4
IA Performance
NASIOC Vendor
 
Member#: 25194
Join Date: Sep 2002
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Boulder, CO
Vehicle:
2008 Forester XT 5mt
Dark Gray

Default

Xluben - thanks for the links!

Another handy link explaining the Pros, Cons and testing steps:
http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-dyn...-properly.html

www.facebook.com/iaperformance
IA Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.