Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Thursday December 18, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > News & Rumors > Non-Subaru News & Rumors

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-28-2013, 03:39 PM   #1
brainfreeze
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 289538
Join Date: Jul 2011
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: PA
Vehicle:
2013 BRZ
Galxy BL-\

Default RAM 1500 Diesel V6 $2850. option

http://www.leftlanenews.com/ram-deta...ecodiesel.html


Ram details 2014 1500 EcoDiesel


Ram has released tentative pricing information and the first images of its upcoming 2014 1500 EcoDiesel. The Ram 1500 EcoDiesel will be the only diesel-powered light-duty pickup truck offered in the segment.

Ram hasn't released full pricing information for the 2014 1500 EcoDiesel, but says the 3.0L turbo diesel V6 option will carry a $2,850 premium over a similarly equipped truck with the automaker's 5.7L HEMI V8. Given that the 2014 Ram 1500 will list from $24,200 (not including a $1,095 destination charge), the EcoDiesel should have a starting MSRP somewhere in the neighborhood of $28,400.
Ram hasn't announced fuel economy figures for the 240 horsepower, 420 lb-ft of torque motor, but promises the 1500 EcoDiesel will return best-in-class fuel economy. The gas-powered Ram 1500 V6 is currently the fuel economy champ with a highway rating of 25mpg.

The 50-state legal Ram 1500 EcoDiesel will be mated exclusively to Chrysler's new TorqueFlite eight-speed automatic transmission.

Look for Ram's lineup of 2014 1500 models to roll into dealer showrooms during the fourth quarter of 2013.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
brainfreeze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 03:50 PM   #2
subydude
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 80649
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Columbia, SC
Vehicle:
2000 2.5 Auto-X RSTi
What's A Head Gasket?

Default

I find it amusing that this 3.0 makes 20 more hp than the 7.3 diesel Ford I have. 80 ft/lbs less torque, but still nothing to sneeze at, and something the tuners will fix in no time.

Still, it'll be the frame/brakes/trans that's the limiting factor in towing.
subydude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 04:59 PM   #3
ChiWRX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 140955
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region: International
Location: Mikado
Vehicle:
Just trying to be
productive here.

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by subydude View Post
I find it amusing that this 3.0 makes 20 more hp than the 7.3 diesel Ford I have. 80 ft/lbs less torque, but still nothing to sneeze at, and something the tuners will fix in no time.

Still, it'll be the frame/brakes/trans that's the limiting factor in towing.
Chrysler Corp. has made some nice engines, but as you mentioned in your post: it's everything ELSE you have to worry about with a Dodge(Ram... whatever.. its all Fiat).
ChiWRX is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 05:14 PM   #4
IMPORTIMAGE
NASIOC Storefront Vendor
 
Member#: 79304
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: FL
Vehicle:
CALL 941-257-9618
www.ImportImageRacing.com

Default

well im interested. my f250 is pretty awesome getting 16-19 mpg but i wouldnt mind a few more and a little less weight. Don't find myself towing much anymore
IMPORTIMAGE is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 08:44 PM   #5
arghx7
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 232940
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: cold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiWRX View Post
Chrysler Corp. has made some nice engines, but as you mentioned in your post: it's everything ELSE you have to worry about with a Dodge(Ram... whatever.. its all Fiat).
The engine is sourced from VM Motori. It's an Italian diesel engine.
arghx7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2013, 09:15 PM   #6
Integra96
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 64196
Join Date: Jun 2004
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Vehicle:
2010 Family Sedan

Default

Unrelated but does the $1,100 destination fee seem high?

Cool diesel option. Imagine if a Tacoma-sized truck had this kind of engine.
Integra96 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 01:25 PM   #7
quentinberg007
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 7887
Join Date: Jun 2001
Default

$5k more for 40 fewer hp when compared to the Pentastar V6. I'm sure there is a niche that will love it, but I don't see too many people paying that premium for an 11% fuel economy bump over the more powerful Pentastar V6. (Comparing 2WD 25mpg V6 gas to 2WD 28mpg V6 diesel).
quentinberg007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 01:57 PM   #8
Kubek
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 53222
Join Date: Jan 2004
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: chicagoland
Vehicle:
'10 Genesis Coupe
'99 Miata

Default

I will wait for my Mahindra TR.
Kubek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 12:12 AM   #9
woody06967
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 110330
Join Date: Mar 2006
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: Canandaigua, NY
Vehicle:
2007 STI Limited
2012 MDX, 2012 TDI

Default

I don't entirely understand the price disparity between gas and diesels in the US market, even after having purchased one myself. Or the disparity in fuel prices, for that matter. Nice torque though.
woody06967 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 11:22 AM   #10
justincredible
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 83633
Join Date: Mar 2005
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: The Mountains
Vehicle:
2012 bright green
box

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quentinberg007 View Post
$5k more for 40 fewer hp when compared to the Pentastar V6. I'm sure there is a niche that will love it, but I don't see too many people paying that premium for an 11% fuel economy bump over the more powerful Pentastar V6. (Comparing 2WD 25mpg V6 gas to 2WD 28mpg V6 diesel).
420 lb-ft of torque






Just pop this right into the wrangler and we're good to go.
justincredible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 12:31 PM   #11
quentinberg007
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 7887
Join Date: Jun 2001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justincredible View Post

420 lb-ft of torque

Just pop this right into the wrangler and we're good to go.
420 ft lb of torque would matter if the wrangler didn't already have a 2 speed transfer case with crazy low crawling gears.
quentinberg007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 12:54 PM   #12
Vostok 7
NASIOC Supporter
 
Member#: 30209
Join Date: Nov 2002
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Get a real car.
Vehicle:
Do you need to
read this in Braille?

Default

No Cummins, no care.
Vostok 7 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 03:50 PM   #13
justincredible
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 83633
Join Date: Mar 2005
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: The Mountains
Vehicle:
2012 bright green
box

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quentinberg007 View Post
420 ft lb of torque would matter if the wrangler didn't already have a 2 speed transfer case with crazy low crawling gears.
Only the Rubicon has the 4:1 low, the rest only have 2.72:1

So that diesel in a basic sport package would be a great option.
justincredible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 04:01 PM   #14
quentinberg007
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 7887
Join Date: Jun 2001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justincredible View Post
Only the Rubicon has the 4:1 low, the rest only have 2.72:1

So that diesel in a basic sport package would be a great option.
I still don't imagine there will be any scenarios where you need the extra torque over a gasser. Just having a 2 speed transfer case gets you out of most places that aren't traction limited. It is bragging rights more than anything. It will be a slower Wrangler that gets 25mpg instead of 22mpg.

Last edited by quentinberg007; 07-01-2013 at 04:06 PM.
quentinberg007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 04:16 PM   #15
Tristar Racing
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 54606
Join Date: Feb 2004
Vehicle:
2005 EVO
2004 IS300

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quentinberg007 View Post
I still don't imagine there will be any scenarios where you need the extra torque over a gasser. Just having a 2 speed transfer case gets you out of most places that aren't traction limited. It is bragging rights more than anything. It will be a slower Wrangler that gets 25mpg instead of 22mpg.
Given the GC with the diesel gets 5 mpg greater fuel economy over the pentastar, I would say your comment is undervaluing the diesel just a bit. (Plus that v-6 gasser needs to be wound up a bit more than most Jeep owners would prefer to get to the power)

Now, the fact that not a single Ecodiesel GC has been built for public consumption is cause for more doubt about one being offered in the Wrangler...
Tristar Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 09:02 AM   #16
MikeNH
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 244821
Join Date: Apr 2010
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Michigan
Vehicle:
2011 Chevy Silverado

Default

I've seen the performance figures for the diesel in the Grand Cherokee, and they're weak. I can only imagine how slow this will be.
MikeNH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 09:22 AM   #17
utekineir
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 233758
Join Date: Dec 2009
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: 01440
Vehicle:
0513 fxtfrs
silver

Default

Modern diesels just arent as appealing as the old ones. Dpf filter, sensiivity to fuel lubricity, etc etc. I don't know about this engine in particular but it seems the majority of the new diesels out there have at least one boogeyman (i.e. the fuel system grenading in cr tdi vws).

$2850 is actually less of an increase than i was expecting, but i wonder how it will affect price flexibility, especially early on.

Pickups have big margins, and much more wiggle room on price than most passenger vehicles.

My work truck is a 13' hemi ram express 4x4 that with a sticker of 32 that was bought for 25. Hopefully that 20% price movement stays intact.

Its averaging around 18mpg, still hasn't seen an oil change or broken in, hoping for 20 mpg later on. It does require relying on cruise to get the ecu to activate eco mode frequently though. The behavior of the cylinder deactivation doesn't work well with a person that keeps their foot on the throttle steady, it acts like it needs a change in vacuum to activate eco after dropping it from something like a hill for example.
utekineir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 09:38 AM   #18
quentinberg007
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 7887
Join Date: Jun 2001
Default

Which engine & trans combo do you have?
quentinberg007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 10:25 AM   #19
utekineir
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 233758
Join Date: Dec 2009
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: 01440
Vehicle:
0513 fxtfrs
silver

Default

hemi, 6 speed, 3.55.
utekineir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 12:30 PM   #20
Tristar Racing
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 54606
Join Date: Feb 2004
Vehicle:
2005 EVO
2004 IS300

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNH View Post
I've seen the performance figures for the diesel in the Grand Cherokee, and they're weak. I can only imagine how slow this will be.
In what way? 0-60 in 7.8, 1/4 Mile in 16 flat for the GC Ecodiesel; I guess I would be curious to know what you were expecting?

(For comparison, the TDI Toureg was only a tenth quicker in both accel tests)
Tristar Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 12:46 PM   #21
MikeNH
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 244821
Join Date: Apr 2010
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Michigan
Vehicle:
2011 Chevy Silverado

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristar Racing View Post

In what way? 0-60 in 7.8, 1/4 Mile in 16 flat for the GC Ecodiesel; I guess I would be curious to know what you were expecting?

(For comparison, the TDI Toureg was only a tenth quicker in both accel tests)
Well considering plenty of pickups are running 0-60 in the 6s and a few break 14 seconds in the quarter, I would like more. But this is a fuel economy motor, not a power one. I'm in the minority I know but for me power>fuel economy all day long. I don't drive my truck enough to care.
MikeNH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 01:16 PM   #22
Tristar Racing
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 54606
Join Date: Feb 2004
Vehicle:
2005 EVO
2004 IS300

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNH View Post
Well considering plenty of pickups are running 0-60 in the 6s and a few break 14 seconds in the quarter, I would like more. But this is a fuel economy motor, not a power one. I'm in the minority I know but for me power>fuel economy all day long. I don't drive my truck enough to care.
Plenty of them? I haven't seen too many stock trucks running that quick, but I will admit I don't pour over truck test data.

Most of us want a diesel option for fuel economy and towing concerns, were you under the impression the EcoDiesel was going to somehow make the trucks faster?
Tristar Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 02:00 PM   #23
MikeNH
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 244821
Join Date: Apr 2010
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Michigan
Vehicle:
2011 Chevy Silverado

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristar Racing View Post

Plenty of them? I haven't seen too many stock trucks running that quick, but I will admit I don't pour over truck test data.

Most of us want a diesel option for fuel economy and towing concerns, were you under the impression the EcoDiesel was going to somehow make the trucks faster?
If someone is regularly towing a heavy load then they should look into an HD truck. No matter what the ratings are, the brakes and suspension on half tons isn't going to cut it for towing anywhere near capacity.

As for your second question, no. I knew this would be a mpg motor from the start, my point was I could care less about gas use so I'd rather a big gas engine- you can get 400ish HP in GM, Ram, Ford and Toyota trucks.
MikeNH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 04:47 PM   #24
Tristar Racing
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 54606
Join Date: Feb 2004
Vehicle:
2005 EVO
2004 IS300

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNH View Post
If someone is regularly towing a heavy load then they should look into an HD truck. No matter what the ratings are, the brakes and suspension on half tons isn't going to cut it for towing anywhere near capacity.
So now full size trucks aren't enough to tow, we need the HD version?

If this mentality keeps up, we might be buying used semi's at some point...
Tristar Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 05:12 PM   #25
Stanley
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 7374
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay, SFCA
Vehicle:
2007 Grandpamobile
BlingBlingBlue

Default

I know quite a few folks who need trucks for their jobs. None of them care about 0-60 or quarter mile times. All of them care about the ability to haul/tow and reliability.
Stanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.