Tire & Wheel Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack
|08-15-2004, 09:53 PM||#11|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: RHE, SoCalVehicle:
2003 WRX Wagon
#1.) what tire are you offering for review (please include size)
Falken Azenis Sport RT-215 205/55-16
#2.) what is your geographic location
#3.) what types of driving events if any (i.e. track, AutoX, RallyX)
#4.) percent of highway vs. city driving
35% highway 65% city
#5.) your review and personal comments
I put these stock size tires on my stock wheels (16x 6.5) to replace the RE-92's, and used them like any other street tire for ~6000 miles.
The grip level on dry pavement is outstanding. Even in the stock size, lateral cornering force exceeds .96g. The side bolsters in the 03 WRX seats are inadequate for these tires.
Steering response is much improved over the RE-92's, and the steering feels much more direct in mid-corner. They respond to small steering corrections quickly and predictably, whether it's a lane change or a mid-corner correction.
They slide progressively at the limit. They inspire confidence when driving quickly.
They have a reasonably comfortable ride.
They are not expensive.
They have a soft tread compound which provides good adhesion.
They have a soft tread compound which provides short tread life.
They are very NOISY. They are so noisy over some types of pavement that the whole dashboard vibrates.
They hydroplane fairly easily. I slow down if I see standing water.
We don't have mud in Southern California, except near the man-made lakes, but if we did, I wouldn't try to drive thru it on these tires. Ditto snow, hail, or any kind of ice.
Compared to the Toyo T1S
After 6,000 miles on the Falkens, I bought a set of 215/45-17 Toyo T1S tires on 17" P1's. Only toward the end of their life did their dry grip levels approach the stock size Falkens, and even then they never were quite as good. This in spite of the Toyo's being 215/45-17's and almost twice the price. I should note that the Toyos were equal or better in every other category of tire performance, making them better for daily use, but for sheer performance on dry pavement, the Falkens are superior by a substantial margin.
Edit: The Falkens have about 7000 miles on them now, and have about half their tread left. Because they are on the stock rims, they are now the 'spare set' of tires.
Dry performance per dollar spent is off the scale, but there are trade-offs. If you live in SoCal, you can use them as street tires.
Last edited by 2Stroke; 09-20-2004 at 05:52 PM. Reason: Fix broken link
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|OBD readiness issue- specific function readiness- please read||mpaone||Engine Management & Tuning||35||09-12-2013 07:15 PM|
|NASIOC winter tire reviews .... please play along||Luke@tirerack||Tire & Wheel||174||07-03-2009 12:50 AM|
|Specific tire pressure ?||Islandxxx||Tire & Wheel||4||12-21-2004 10:00 PM|
|Hawk vs Porterfield (tirerack.com please respond)||SilverRush||Brakes, Steering & Suspension||2||03-11-2004 11:59 PM|
|Suspension Specific Tire Pressure Settings (STi V5)?||FatChanceTi||Technical Forum Archive||1||05-09-2000 12:11 AM|