|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-04-2013, 12:52 AM | #1 |
Former Vendor
Member#: 26933
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fairfield, CA
Vehicle:2006 STI CGM |
EQ Built 05 STI with ATP GTX3076 on E85
This is another street monster we built a bit ago that just finished break-in.
Event: Custom Tune/Dyno Location: Equilibrium Tuning - Fairfield, CA Ambient Temp: 50 degrees Fahrenheit Elevation: ~100ft above sea level Car: 2005 Subaru STI Tuner: ED @ Equilibrium Tuning Peak HP at RPM: 529whp @ 6000RPM Peak Torque at RPM: 524ft-lbs @ 4950RPM Target Boost: 24psi peak Fuel: E85 Engine/Power Modifications: EQ Stage 2 Shortblock (CP Pistons, Manley I-Beam Rods) EQ Stage 2 Heads (valve job, bowl blend, stock cams) ATP Stock Location GTX3076 with EWG Tomei EL Header / UP Tomei full Titanium TBE EQ Tuning FMIC EQ Tuning Intake EQ Tuning Catch Can ID2000cc Injectors ID Sidefeed conversion Kit Aeromotive FPR Aeromotive 340lph pump with EQ Wiring Kit Tuned with Cobb Speed Density This is only at 24psi because the single Aeromotive pump started dropping pressure even with a hardwire kit. We're going to switch to something bigger and turn up the boost. **** New 2013+ Dyno Calibration **** Stock 02-05 WRX - 185-195whp Stock 04-07 STI - 240-250whp Stock 08-11 STI - 220-230whp Thanks -- Ed
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Last edited by Equilibrium Tuning; 01-04-2013 at 01:32 AM. |
01-04-2013, 01:03 AM | #2 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 38620
Join Date: Jun 2003
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Tarzana
Vehicle:2005 Subaru WRX STI OBP |
Wow. That thing is a beast.
|
01-04-2013, 01:08 AM | #3 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 186457
Join Date: Aug 2008
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: san francisco EQ Built
Vehicle:2010 Subaru STI SE DGM |
hey ed? how did this car make 100whp more than mine with the same basic mods and build..just curious
|
01-04-2013, 01:14 AM | #4 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 72829
Join Date: Oct 2004
Chapter/Region:
W. Canada
Location: Calgary, Canada
Vehicle:2006 WRX 2015 WRX |
|
01-04-2013, 01:30 AM | #5 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 26933
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fairfield, CA
Vehicle:2006 STI CGM |
Quote:
Thanks -- Ed |
|
01-04-2013, 01:34 AM | #6 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 186457
Join Date: Aug 2008
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: san francisco EQ Built
Vehicle:2010 Subaru STI SE DGM |
im gonna need a new dyno graph print out lol, when i come in on wednesday !!!!
Last edited by silverbullet415; 01-04-2013 at 01:55 AM. |
01-04-2013, 02:28 AM | #7 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 245029
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Finally Dyno jet numbers lol. I'm really starting to finally like this gtx3076
|
01-04-2013, 03:38 AM | #8 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 123333
Join Date: Aug 2006
Chapter/Region:
International
Location: Jerusalem
Vehicle:2009 STi DMG |
Wow at only 24 psi!
This is a dynocom right? |
01-04-2013, 07:55 AM | #9 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:2002 WRX - 750WHP 9.5s @ 150mph |
How much CF did you add to convert to Dynojet equivalent numbers?
Powerband looks good. I'd be interested to see how the 340 pump does long term, but it sounds like you're going to switch it out anyways. Are you going to try to fit something else into the hanger? |
01-04-2013, 09:25 AM | #10 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 133146
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SC
Vehicle:07 FPgreen 7.37@95 WRX VF39+E85 12.0, 121mph |
it looks really good Ed.
|
01-04-2013, 09:39 AM | #11 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 44836
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Vehicle:1999 Fozzy silver |
why did you change your correction factor so drastically?
|
01-04-2013, 10:09 AM | #12 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 133146
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SC
Vehicle:07 FPgreen 7.37@95 WRX VF39+E85 12.0, 121mph |
|
01-04-2013, 10:32 AM | #13 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 44836
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Vehicle:1999 Fozzy silver |
ah....changing with the times and going from the "heart breaker" to the "sweet heart" calibration.
In Ed's defense he held out for true numbers more than most did, and people around this forum are starting to call their local dynojets and 'wheels-off' variants "heart breakers". The last people I knew of using real mustang type numbers were Akuma, EQ, and STM. Pretty sure Akuma is on the dynojet calibration now too for the same reason.... I guess, though, if other shops are using the inflated numbers it makes it harder to compete when you say they can make "300" and the other place is saying they can make "350". Ah well. |
01-04-2013, 11:09 AM | #14 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 293500
Join Date: Sep 2011
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Bay Area, California
Vehicle:2015 FXT Stage 2 CWP |
Quote:
Exactly! Silverbullet415 and I had this exact discussion about why Ed did this last night. Wish he hadn't since he's been known for lower reading dyno numbers for so long, but as you wrote times have changed. |
|
01-04-2013, 11:09 AM | #15 |
Former Vendor
Member#: 26933
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fairfield, CA
Vehicle:2006 STI CGM |
|
01-04-2013, 11:11 AM | #16 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 26933
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fairfield, CA
Vehicle:2006 STI CGM |
Quote:
I have a handful of 340's wired like this with no problems. They've been running around for at least a year. I think we're going to try one of the bigger Walbros on this car. -- Ed |
|
01-04-2013, 11:15 AM | #17 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 26933
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fairfield, CA
Vehicle:2006 STI CGM |
Quote:
-- Ed |
|
01-04-2013, 11:16 AM | #18 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 26933
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fairfield, CA
Vehicle:2006 STI CGM |
Quote:
-- Ed |
|
01-04-2013, 11:19 AM | #19 |
Former Vendor
Member#: 26933
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fairfield, CA
Vehicle:2006 STI CGM |
Back on topic, I'm really liking this turbo a lot. It makes similar power to the old GT3582 but really fills in the powerband before the torque peak. The drivability and transient response are awesome.
-- Ed |
01-04-2013, 11:47 AM | #20 | |
NASIOC Supporter
Member#: 130990
Join Date: Nov 2006
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Menzel Lake, WA
Vehicle:06 Red Ltd.Wagon Dom 1.5xtr JJ tuned |
Quote:
How would your new CF equate to trap speeds now? |
|
01-04-2013, 12:59 PM | #21 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 146874
Join Date: Apr 2007
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Oakland
Vehicle:07 STI Widebody ETS,Volk,Voltex,Varis |
Damn, you keep posting these new ATP GTX series turbos Ed and its making me want to swap out the GT52!
So by my math, my car would now read about 485whp 520 torque on your dyno now?? Matt |
01-04-2013, 01:47 PM | #22 |
Former Vendor
Member#: 26933
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fairfield, CA
Vehicle:2006 STI CGM |
Actually closer to 496whp I believe. I'll have to check it out. The nice thing is I can reprint anyone's dyno chart from the past with the new calibration.
-- Ed |
01-04-2013, 02:16 PM | #23 | ||
Scooby Guru
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:2002 WRX - 750WHP 9.5s @ 150mph |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-04-2013, 02:59 PM | #24 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 72829
Join Date: Oct 2004
Chapter/Region:
W. Canada
Location: Calgary, Canada
Vehicle:2006 WRX 2015 WRX |
IIRC, Ed's original calibration for the dyno was based matching up results with his road dyno software, which happens to be close the old Mustang results.
|
01-04-2013, 03:12 PM | #25 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 26933
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fairfield, CA
Vehicle:2006 STI CGM |
Quote:
-- Ed |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|