Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Tuesday March 19, 2024
Home Forums Images WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
Click here to visit TireRack
Brakes & Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack

Losing traction? Need new tires?
Click here to visit the NASIOC Upgrade Garage...
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC Technical > Brakes, Steering & Suspension

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.







* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. 
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads. 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-20-2011, 04:34 PM   #276
NcKidd
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 133267
Join Date: Nov 2006
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Portland, Oregon
Vehicle:
2004 psm WRX

Default

read thru entire thread, still a little unsure of DD settings...

having this setup installed by Cobb Surgeline as we speak: d-specs with crucial racing springs (257/217) & group N tophats. what settings would be optimal for this spring rate?

thanks in advance, will post whole setup (and revisions) going forward.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
NcKidd is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Old 06-22-2011, 02:09 PM   #277
NcKidd
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 133267
Join Date: Nov 2006
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Portland, Oregon
Vehicle:
2004 psm WRX

Lightbulb

Just a quick point- If people start posting their springs' rates with the type of springs being used, it will make all the postings in this thread much more meaningful and infinitely more useful....some have, but most omit this vital info.

Also, more explanation of why you have your D-specs set the way you do.... Chance? Experience? A little troll told you to?
NcKidd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 12:12 AM   #278
ezil71
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 207118
Join Date: Mar 2009
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Vehicle:
2003 Wrx Wagon

Default

I have the dspecs with RCE wagon springs on my bugeye.

I did 'extensive' testing on my own, and could never quite get the balance right. There was always this bobble type, unbalanced feel to them.

Another member helped me calculate settings based on the rce rates, and my bugeye weight.

Here they are if they are helpful:

these are settings with 58/42 weight distribution..

90% - 3 3/16 front 4 13/16 rear
85% - 3 5/8 front 5 rear
80% - 4 1/16 front 5 7/16 rear
75% - 4 7/16 front 5 3/4 rear


50/50 is:

85% - 4 3/8 front 4 11/16 rear
80% - 4 3/4 front 5 rear
75% - 5 1/16 front 5 5/16 rear

I know the car isn't 50/50, but for those that want to play around, useful to try out. Tends to flatten out the steering a bit.


In any case - all of these settings tend to get rid of that annoying bobble between front and rear.

I don't recall the RCE wagon rates off the top of my head though
ezil71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 07:40 AM   #279
Vlad
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 46135
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:
19 GLA45 AMG
C63 AMG

Default

I don't know if anybody is going to read this posting burried in so many pages of settings, but it's not only about suspension:

If you have upgraded brakes, like I do, they are affected by weight transfer.
If the d-specs provide flat braking, due to the front vs rear settings, like mines once did, the ABS system is affected by this. There's an article on Stoptech's page about upgraded brakes that deals with this.

So I have Brembo GT front upgrade only, they were designed to work with the OEM rears. Not also with the modified weight transfer, due to the D-specs.
At high speed strong braking, the rears don't lock up anymore and the fronts start locking early.
Once I adjusted the d-specs to allow for some dive, the problem was alleviated.
Vlad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 09:47 PM   #280
bdj238
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 207561
Join Date: Apr 2009
Chapter/Region: AKIC
Location: Alaska
Vehicle:
2018 Forester Limite
Pearl

Default

That's very interesting. What type of settings on your dspecs did you go with to achieve the change in braking?
bdj238 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 12:11 AM   #281
Vlad
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 46135
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:
19 GLA45 AMG
C63 AMG

Default

5.5 front and rear.
Vlad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2011, 10:59 PM   #282
wrxwagontoo
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 257490
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Branford, CT
Vehicle:
2005 WRX Wagon
CGM

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ezil71 View Post
I have the dspecs with RCE wagon springs on my bugeye.

I did 'extensive' testing on my own, and could never quite get the balance right. There was always this bobble type, unbalanced feel to them.

Another member helped me calculate settings based on the rce rates, and my bugeye weight.

Here they are if they are helpful:

these are settings with 58/42 weight distribution..

90% - 3 3/16 front 4 13/16 rear
85% - 3 5/8 front 5 rear
80% - 4 1/16 front 5 7/16 rear
75% - 4 7/16 front 5 3/4 rear


50/50 is:

85% - 4 3/8 front 4 11/16 rear
80% - 4 3/4 front 5 rear
75% - 5 1/16 front 5 5/16 rear

I know the car isn't 50/50, but for those that want to play around, useful to try out. Tends to flatten out the steering a bit.


In any case - all of these settings tend to get rid of that annoying bobble between front and rear.

I don't recall the RCE wagon rates off the top of my head though
Can someone explain what the % means in the above examples and how it applies to choosing settings? Thanks, Gregg
wrxwagontoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2011, 09:31 AM   #283
bdj238
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 207561
Join Date: Apr 2009
Chapter/Region: AKIC
Location: Alaska
Vehicle:
2018 Forester Limite
Pearl

Default

I think it's percent stiff
bdj238 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2011, 08:39 PM   #284
bdj238
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 207561
Join Date: Apr 2009
Chapter/Region: AKIC
Location: Alaska
Vehicle:
2018 Forester Limite
Pearl

Default

Well I finally got my Tokico's dialed in. I forget what I ended up with on turns, but I know I was doing quarter turns towards the end to dial it in.

2005 WAGON
Tokico D-specs
Wagon Take-off's
Sedan Aluminum LCA's (the good ones)
Whiteline Camber Plates
Rolled Fenders


Left Front:
-1.8 Camber
5.0 Caster
-0.05 Toe

Right Front:
-1.7 Camber
5.1 Caster
-0.00 Toe

Left Rear:
-0.7 Camber
0.01 Toe

Right Rear
-0.8 Camber
.11 Toe

Thinking about camber bolts in the rear and pushing the front camber a little further but since its a DD I'm not sure at what point I should stop with the camber on the front.

With the sedan LCA's should I be having the alignment tech put any of the settings in differently on the comp??

Last edited by bdj238; 10-30-2011 at 08:40 PM. Reason: question
bdj238 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 01:35 AM   #285
NcKidd
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 133267
Join Date: Nov 2006
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Portland, Oregon
Vehicle:
2004 psm WRX

Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Back Road Runner View Post
Small note on this thread.

Damper setting is relative to the spring rate used and the mass load it supports. That means the actual setting is based off the lb/in of the spring used and the overall weight and weight balance of the car. A 3500 lb. car with a 60/40 weight distribution on 250 lb/in F, 200 lb/in R springs will use a slightly different damper setting then a 3200 lb. car with a 58/42 weight distribution on the same 250/200 lb/in springs.

There will be ONE correct damper setting for a specific setup. The front and rear dampers will most likely NOT be set equal.

Notes on tuning.
Too stiff: car feels like it's "falling" after bumps and the car feels skittish over bumps since the tire leaves the ground and has a delay falling back to Earth.
Too soft: car bounds upward after bumps causing excess chassis motion and an overall sloppy feeling.

You'll want the point in between where the car feels like it "floats" over bumps. You'll want both the front AND rear to do this. This will give you the best ride and best car behavior.

Adjust the struts in coarse increments and as you get above and below the ideal, step down to smaller increments.
1 turn
1/2 turn
1/4 turn
1/8 turn
1/16 turn
fine tuning

You should be able to dial it in both quickly in coarse steps and exactly as you adjust in finer and finer detail.

To stay on topic to the thread:

02 Forester S
Weight: 3300 - 3500 lbs ???
Balance: 60/40 - 57/43 ???
RCE Wagon springs front (279 lb/in)
Prodrive STI springs rear (~200-220 lb/in ???)
Front turns: 2 13/16 turns
Rear turns: 5 5/8 turns

If anybody wants a rough starting point for their D-Spec settings, look at "suspensioncalc.xls" on this forum. Then take the D-Spec dyno graph (again available on this forum if you don't have the manual lying around) and multiply by 9.81 to get the N/mm, mm/s values in the Excel spreadsheet.

Example:
3500 lb. car
58/42 weight distibution
250 lb/in front
200 lb/in rear

100% rebound dampening goal (stiff, starting point, and you will tune down from here)
Front rebound rate (at 0.3 m/s): 2600
Rear rebound rate (at 0.3 m/s): 1950

Divide by 9.81
Front (kg): 265
Rear (kg): 199

These are the numbers you look for on the D-Spec dyno graph at the 0.3 m/s point. It can be any point really as the D-Specs are pretty linear in rate. 0.3 m/s seems common.

On the dyno graph, you find this correlates to around 3 turns Front and 4 3/4 turns Rear.

Now in the SuspensionCalc.xls spreadsheet you can play around with car weight and weight balance to see what I mean about how the dampening changes a little with these adjustments. You can get a good starting point with this route, and then tune slightly to the actual ideal setting for your car. I've personally found this method to create a slightly stiff setup, and you have to tune down from here a little. However, it seems to be decently close and within, say, a quarter of a turn or so from ideal. It sort of depends on how good your guess is for your car's weight and balance as well as how accurate the spring rates are.



SuspensionCalc.xls spreadsheet:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1292451
Does anyone know where suspensioncalc.xls is located on this forum?? I want to figure out the perfect settings for my springs.
NcKidd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 03:03 AM   #286
JDwhiteWRX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 190502
Join Date: Sep 2008
Chapter/Region: International
Location: Sydney, Australia
Default

2005 AUDM WRX sedan
2.5 turns front/ 3 turns rear
STi Spec C RAR springs 340lbs/inch F, 285lbs/inch R
Com-C front top hats, group N rear
24mm front swaybar, 22mm rear swaybar, TiC fender braces, loads of bushings, spaced lower control arm for caster, camber bolts in front, too many suspension mods to list and 125kg weight reduction.
17x7.5 +53 w/225/45/17 Kumho KU36
-3 deg camber f/0 toe f/6 deg caster
-2 deg camber r/0 toe
JDwhiteWRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 12:15 AM   #287
qstarin
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 186129
Join Date: Aug 2008
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2001 2.5RS
STM

Default

2001 Impreza RS sedan
weighed in at 1765 lbs fr/1486 lbs r (54.3%/45.7%) (with driver)
5.5k fr/4.9k r Eibach springs (307 lbs/in, 273 lbs/in) on Ground Control perches
215/45/R17 Pilot Exalto PE2 on 17x7 FN01R-C wheels
Whiteline 22-26mm rear sway on 22mm
Stock top hats, stock front sway
Solid end links, poly bushings.

4.75 fr/5.5 r (TFFF)


I think I might be a bit underdamped... I run softer setting than many people with lower rate springs anyway.

But if I try to go much more than another turn stiffer I have trouble with the rear end bounding up over bumps and skipping, and I also have trouble finding a good ratio between front and rear and I get a lot of pitching back and forth on wavey highways.

I'm about to take it all apart and install Bakemono camber/caster plates all around. I had thought about going to softer springs, too, but they seem fine as long as I don't set the dampers too stiff.

I didn't see many people in this thread running springs around 300 lbs/in, and the few that were seemed to have awfully stiff settings dialed in on the D-Specs.
qstarin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2012, 10:00 PM   #288
Lurch33
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 261832
Join Date: Oct 2010
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: NoVA
Vehicle:
2010 STi
Black

Default

06 WRX

Tanabe DF-210 springs

Front - 5 turns from full stiff
Rear - 6 turns from full stiff

Camber -1* all around

Had the D-Specs set poorly until I read this thread. Made me understand spring rates better when adjusting the D-Specs. Used to set them too stiff all over, and always stiffer in the back than the front. The difference is unbelievable now that I know what I am doing.
Lurch33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2012, 01:51 AM   #289
txl146
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 32459
Join Date: Feb 2003
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:
02 WRX VF34 (SOLD)
Junior Tuned 301whp

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turn in Concepts View Post
2 tffs is WAY too stiff. We find that for most stiff springs (swift spec r, RCE) the optimal range is 4-5 tffs. No more is needed.

Tony
Very useful info.

02 WRX
RCE yellow
F/R = 5/5 (will try 4/4.5 next)

Camber -2.5 front / -1 rear
Caster: 3.6/4

Updated: what a difference 0.5 turn makes... went to 4.5/5 from 5/5 and it made noticeable difference.

Last edited by txl146; 04-22-2012 at 06:23 PM.
txl146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 06:22 PM   #290
wrxsomeday
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 141991
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
14 FRS Ultramarine
16 Forester XT CWP

Default

Current setup on my 05 saabaru wagon (same as a WRX):

Tokico D-Specs
RCE Yellow Springs with 1/4" spacer in rear (spring rates: 295 lb/in front and 275 in/lb rear)
DMS front Camber Plates and Group N rear top hats
-3.0 deg camber in front
-1.3 deg camber in rear
+4.4 deg caster in front

Current settings:
3 tffs in front
3.5 tffs in rear

Seems pretty comfortable now, however I want the best setup for autox. I messed with a few settings at the last test n tune:
3 tffs front and 3.5 tffs rear (only one run)
2 front and 2.5 rear (only one run)
1 front and 1.5 rear (only one run)
Went full stiff for the remaining ~5 runs

I'm thinking that the 0 tffs was probably a bit too stiff ...anyone run theirs 0 tffs for autox? I'm curious to see how stiff people run them for autox. I think there is def a point that the springs are over dampened!

Last edited by wrxsomeday; 06-07-2012 at 06:29 PM.
wrxsomeday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 10:31 AM   #291
ezil71
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 207118
Join Date: Mar 2009
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Vehicle:
2003 Wrx Wagon

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxwagontoo View Post
Can someone explain what the % means in the above examples and how it applies to choosing settings? Thanks, Gregg

Percent damped - the higher the %, the stiffer the ride
ezil71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 04:08 AM   #292
ezil71
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 207118
Join Date: Mar 2009
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Vehicle:
2003 Wrx Wagon

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxsomeday View Post
Current setup on my 05 saabaru wagon (same as a WRX):

Tokico D-Specs
RCE Yellow Springs with 1/4" spacer in rear (spring rates: 295 lb/in front and 275 in/lb rear)
DMS front Camber Plates and Group N rear top hats
-3.0 deg camber in front
-1.3 deg camber in rear
+4.4 deg caster in front

Current settings:
3 tffs in front
3.5 tffs in rear

Seems pretty comfortable now, however I want the best setup for autox. I messed with a few settings at the last test n tune:
3 tffs front and 3.5 tffs rear (only one run)
2 front and 2.5 rear (only one run)
1 front and 1.5 rear (only one run)
Went full stiff for the remaining ~5 runs

I'm thinking that the 0 tffs was probably a bit too stiff ...anyone run theirs 0 tffs for autox? I'm curious to see how stiff people run them for autox. I think there is def a point that the springs are over dampened!

Those are all too stiff for the RCE's - see Tic's comment above - the range is 4 to 5 for the most part.

Your wagon is probably pretty close to mine

Try

4 3/8 front

4 11/16 rear

Keep in mind there is really only 1 setting that is 'ideal', so changing for autox might 'feel' better, but your best gripping setup is going to feel softer than what you are using now and don't bother going stiffer than 4.

Even a 1/8 or 1/16 turn can make big difference!
ezil71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 10:27 AM   #293
wrxsomeday
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 141991
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
14 FRS Ultramarine
16 Forester XT CWP

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ezil71 View Post
Those are all too stiff for the RCE's - see Tic's comment above - the range is 4 to 5 for the most part.

Your wagon is probably pretty close to mine

Try

4 3/8 front

4 11/16 rear

Keep in mind there is really only 1 setting that is 'ideal', so changing for autox might 'feel' better, but your best gripping setup is going to feel softer than what you are using now and don't bother going stiffer than 4.

Even a 1/8 or 1/16 turn can make big difference!
Yep, I did see that comment above. There was an autox on this last Sunday and I did some experimenting...I started off at 3 front and 2.5 rear for the 4 morning runs. For the afternoon runs (only 2), I cranked them up to 2.5 front and 2 rear. My times did improve considerably (improved about a full second per lap), however part of that may be due to learning the course better and better driving.

However, it is worth mentioning that I am still on stock sway bars, and I'm probably seeing "gains" from stiffening because it is dialing out some of that body roll. It was discussed in here before somewhere that stiffening the struts to reduce body roll is NOT the correct mechanism for reducing body roll...sway bars are. I guess its also worth mentioning that I got some "funky" tire wear (ie shredding in the middle of the tire) from the first autox when I had the struts at 0 (probably had tire pressures a bit high too).

Sure, I am seeing from gains from over-dampening, however I will probably see an even bigger gain in handling with bigger sway bars and the proper dampening. Ultimately, I'm going to need to upgrade my swaybars and keep the d-specs around the 4-5 range!

Thanks all for the insight
wrxsomeday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 05:10 PM   #294
hella_sti
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 139289
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: ND
Vehicle:
2003 WRX Wagon
PSM

Default

I've searched this thread and cannot find an answer if dspecs will work on my 2003 Wexford wagon with a set of aftermarket camber bolts? I'm assuming the fronts will be fine? I'll be running rce wagon specific springs if that matters at all
hella_sti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 06:14 PM   #295
wrxsomeday
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 141991
Join Date: Feb 2007
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
14 FRS Ultramarine
16 Forester XT CWP

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hella_sti View Post
I've searched this thread and cannot find an answer if dspecs will work on my 2003 Wexford wagon with a set of aftermarket camber bolts? I'm assuming the fronts will be fine? I'll be running rce wagon specific springs if that matters at all
I'm assuming you mean WRX wagon...haha darn auto correct.

But YES the Tokico D-specs will work on your wagon (I have them installed on my wagon). The only thing to keep in mind is that you will lose about 0.7 degrees of negative camber in the front. The D-Specs are designed for WRX sedans, and since sedans have a slightly wider track in the front, you lose some negative camber when using a strut designed for a sedan (d-spec) on a wagon.

You can regain some of this camber this by installing sedan control arms, using camber plates in the front (Whiteline also makes top hats called the Com C, which offers more camber and caster. They are not adjustable, yet they offer some comfort and are fairly reasonably priced), or even aftermarket camber bolts in the front (to be used in the bottom hole only! - and retain the stock camber bolts in the upper hole).

Since you already have camber bolts, here is an excellent thread to answer any questions that you may have about camber bolts:

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1590221

hope this info helps...and remember...search is your friend.
wrxsomeday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2012, 11:59 AM   #296
916dave
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 27896
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacto
Vehicle:
2003 WRX Wagon
Silver

Default

I keep seeing people refer to a "break in period" here. I recently had a set of d-specs installed and couldnt find any mention of a break in period in the manual so I called Tokico. The tech there said there was no break in period necessary for these struts.

Just thought I'd throw that out there.
916dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 12:34 PM   #297
03blackwrx02yellowsv
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 229840
Join Date: Nov 2009
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: cincy
Vehicle:
03 wrx
MBP black

Default

2003 wrx with 97,000 miles
RCE yellows with group n tophats
Whiteline 24 swaybar in front, rallytek 24 swaybar in back
Upper strut bars front and rear
Continental extreme contact DWS tires in "too heavy" enkei 17 inch EVO 6 wheels
Steering, diff, outrigger bushing and botox bolts
4 1/2 f and 4 3/4 r seems best so far

Started off at 5 all around for 100 miles. Rode awesome, started increasing stiffness too much (3ish range), then softened it up too much (6ish range)... As stated above "best" setting should be between 4-5 depending on mods, roads, weight, and driving style

Further tinkering and fine tuning to come after alignment in a couple days and ill update settings

Much thanks to Tony, Clint and the rest of the crew at TIC for the products, direction, and advice!

Last edited by 03blackwrx02yellowsv; 09-09-2012 at 12:52 PM.
03blackwrx02yellowsv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 10:42 AM   #298
haberkorn
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 97732
Join Date: Oct 2005
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Colorado
Vehicle:
2004 STi
65 Nova 8.80@151

Default

Anyone have any insight into settings with a set of Prodrive red's?

Nearest I can tell the spring rates on the reds are 215 F / 195 R or close to 240 F / 220 R. If they're an actual 25% increase over stock like stated by Prodrive.

Last edited by haberkorn; 10-04-2012 at 12:50 PM.
haberkorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 01:21 PM   #299
Vlad
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 46135
Join Date: Oct 2003
Chapter/Region: Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:
19 GLA45 AMG
C63 AMG

Default

I looked into theose 1 year ago. I think there were two generations, one for the '04 Sti and one for 06+, in addition to the blues for WRX.
The later ones were said to be better.
I could probably not dig again where I've read this, was burried somewhere.
There were reds for V7 Sti as well, but the guy that was selling them on ebay.co.uk refused to answer my questions so I passed.
Vlad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 01:24 PM   #300
haberkorn
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 97732
Join Date: Oct 2005
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Colorado
Vehicle:
2004 STi
65 Nova 8.80@151

Default

I've got the 04 models, I bought them new so I could read the serial number on them clear as day. Prodrive seems to have never published their spring rate spec's just stated they were a "25% increase over stock".

I just want get them set up the first time instead of ripping the back seat out every other day to make a change heh.
haberkorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gauging interest: Tokico D-spec + new Swift R-spec springs Turn in Concepts Vendor 'Group Buy' Classifieds 45 03-09-2008 10:55 PM
ONE SET Tokico D Spec IN STOCK ON SALE. + Koni inserts & Crucial Springs in stock! Crucial Racing Suspension/Brakes/Handling 7 10-26-2007 02:07 PM
what are your tokico d-spec settings? ASpec818 Brakes, Steering & Suspension 7 07-30-2006 06:26 PM
Tokico D-Specs? BAC5.2 Brakes, Steering & Suspension 2 11-02-2004 06:28 PM
Tokico d-spec struts pyropretz Brakes, Steering & Suspension 12 09-22-2004 03:32 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2019, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission
Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.