Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Friday March 29, 2024
Home Forums Images WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > Proven Power Bragging

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.







* As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. 
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads. 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2010, 03:57 PM   #1
mcganz121
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 138569
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Vehicle:
2017 A4 Quattro

Default 09 wrx stock turbo 329whp

Event: Dyno Pull
Location: HB Speed Fountain Valley Ca.
Ambient Temp: 75 degrees Fahrenheit
Elevation: 15-45 Feet Above Sea Level
Weather: Sunny
Tires: Azenis 615


Tuner: Jon @ HB Speed
Dyno Info: Dynomite
Peak HP at RPM: 329 @ 6.2k SAE Correction
Peak Torque at RPM: 334 @ 4.5K SAE Correction
Baseline hp/tq for a stock on same dyno: 245whp
Target Boost: 18-19 PSI
Target AFR: ???
Fuel: Pump 91 Octane
Engine/Power Modifications:

Catless tbe
Perrin tmic
Walbro 255
Pnp header by wrxsubiemod
Harman cai

I know this is similar to a dynojet so the numbers are pretty high, but I was pretty amazed at the gain from so few mods. The car feels great compared to my old setup.... Ill post it below in comparison. The old setup was a catted dp, spt cb, and harman cai.

Future plans: inlet, injectors, ebcs, and maybe ewg (next year)


New:


Old:
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.

Last edited by mcganz121; 02-16-2010 at 03:44 PM.
mcganz121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Old 02-14-2010, 04:05 PM   #2
jordanretro1223
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 143039
Join Date: Mar 2007
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: Delaware
Vehicle:
2007 STI
Satin White Pearl

Default

Impressive. Have fun man!
jordanretro1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 04:18 PM   #3
godforbid67
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 137168
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: ummm..... Andrewtech ftmfw!
Vehicle:
06 Built SGM WRX
35r, PPG, 280's, PSS9.

Default

Nice.
godforbid67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 04:38 PM   #4
LVBugEyed
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 186870
Join Date: Aug 2008
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: Las Vegas
Vehicle:
2010 WRX
OBP

Default

how much boost would you need to be able to hit these numbers with a turbo inlet / fmic / ewg? All other supporting mods to ofcourse
LVBugEyed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 04:41 PM   #5
REDrum
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 61536
Join Date: May 2004
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Peoples Republik of Cambridge
Vehicle:
WRX' 04Road02gravel
www.ToltecRally.com

Default

Extraordinary...
What was the delta WHP from stock to current? Absolute WHP # are worthless w/o baseline # to compare
REDrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 04:46 PM   #6
mcganz121
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 138569
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Vehicle:
2017 A4 Quattro

Default

Not sure what the baseline is for an 09 wrx... Stock sti puts down 221/257 from what I have seen on a previous hb speed dyno chart.
mcganz121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 06:17 PM   #7
scramjett
*** Banned ***
 
Member#: 192526
Join Date: Oct 2008
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Vehicle:
2008 WRX FMIC/VF48
Red/Steel Grey

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcganz121 View Post
Not sure what the baseline is for an 09 wrx... Stock sti puts down 221/257 from what I have seen on a previous hb speed dyno chart.
I call 'bull'. Not on stock fuel(ing). Or likewise, not on a *safe* tune. Whats your IDC???

My car also feels great compared to stock, so seat of the pants dyno's don't mean anything. Whats the car trap at? Any data logs to share?
scramjett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 06:28 PM   #8
Byzantium
*** Banned ***
 
Member#: 207826
Join Date: Apr 2009
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: Katabatic
Vehicle:
85k 2002 WRX
Correct Fitment Crew #034

Default

Likewise. 330 whp on 91 octane with a VF52? What did it make before correction?
Byzantium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 06:50 PM   #9
mcganz121
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 138569
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Vehicle:
2017 A4 Quattro

Default

Sorry guys dont have any other info. This is my fourth tune by hb speed and this nor my 06 ever had any problems.

Heading out to v-day dinner...

-Michael
mcganz121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 08:24 AM   #10
REDrum
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 61536
Join Date: May 2004
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Peoples Republik of Cambridge
Vehicle:
WRX' 04Road02gravel
www.ToltecRally.com

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcganz121 View Post
Not sure what the baseline is for an 09 wrx... Stock sti puts down 221/257 from what I have seen on a previous hb speed dyno chart.
My dyno experience data points are all from Dyno Dynamics units and generaly stock engines/drivelines fall into the baseline standards (varriation +/- 5%):

2.0L WRX 02 to 05 = 160whp
2.5L WRX 06 to 08 = 185whp
2.5L STi 04 to 07 = 225whp

(Mustang dynos tend to read +15whp more than dyno dynamics)

Thus if Mcganz's WRX put down ~225 as a baseline (which means the dyno is waaay off), yes he could have pulled 325whp which means his mods gained ~100whp. But not 150whp w/o some combination cams/race gas/water-meth. Those turbos/heads just dont move that much air.
REDrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 12:32 PM   #11
fourmicah
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 128760
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Over there>
Vehicle:
2017 STI
Silver

Default

^^^ I hate to jump in on most of these conversations, but I have to agree. I know a dyno is a tuning tool, but these numbers seem way too high without some kind of modification to the turbo, E85, meth, or some sort of race gas.
fourmicah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 01:29 PM   #12
REDrum
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 61536
Join Date: May 2004
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Peoples Republik of Cambridge
Vehicle:
WRX' 04Road02gravel
www.ToltecRally.com

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fourmicah View Post
but these numbers seem way too high without some kind of modification to the turbo, E85, meth, or some sort of race gas.
Tq curve and gain don't look right for E85 plus he'd need near 800cc injectors too, man that stuff is inefficient.

I'm not claiming/calling BS, but rather would like to figure out what caused such high dyno numbers. While we all tend to be skeptical about dyno numbers here, the tuner may be on to somthing new, the dyno is could be off, FHI changed somthing, or a combo plate of the above....

BTW....are the graphs in post #1 above actual whp or "corrected" chp?
REDrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 02:22 PM   #13
mcganz121
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 138569
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Vehicle:
2017 A4 Quattro

Default

its wheel not crank.... My tune is similar to Redzfit..

Look here
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=1887005
mcganz121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 02:25 PM   #14
redzfit
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 191518
Join Date: Oct 2008
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: So Cal
Vehicle:
2009 STI Hatch

Default

Mcganz Congrats! Your car is making more power than mine with less mods. You can really see the difference in tq from the tmic and the fmic. You are making almost 60 wtq more than I am at 3k.

Hope your v-day dinner was good
redzfit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 02:50 PM   #15
fourmicah
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 128760
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Over there>
Vehicle:
2017 STI
Silver

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDrum View Post
Tq curve and gain don't look right for E85 plus he'd need near 800cc injectors too, man that stuff is inefficient.

I'm not claiming/calling BS, but rather would like to figure out what caused such high dyno numbers. While we all tend to be skeptical about dyno numbers here, the tuner may be on to somthing new, the dyno is could be off, FHI changed somthing, or a combo plate of the above....

BTW....are the graphs in post #1 above actual whp or "corrected" chp?
I agree completely, I spaced the injector size for E85, but your right. Either this guy is the Albert Einstein of tuning or something else is going on.
fourmicah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 02:57 PM   #16
fourmicah
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 128760
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Over there>
Vehicle:
2017 STI
Silver

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcganz121 View Post

Fuel: Pump 91 Octane
Hey mcganz121, I don't mean to knock your set up, it looks sweet. The only thing that doesn't make sense to many of us is how the tuning was able to perform this kind of power on 91 Octane. I deal with the same crappy gas here is Utah which is why I would almost rather run E85, Hopefully your tuner will chime in on the set up/tune/correction factor used.
fourmicah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 03:00 PM   #17
mcganz121
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 138569
Join Date: Jan 2007
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Vehicle:
2017 A4 Quattro

Default

Yea no worries...

Maybe Jon will chime in.
mcganz121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 03:06 PM   #18
25rsti
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 166324
Join Date: Dec 2007
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: BLOD in BLOD out
Default

Seems almost too good to be true. Though I/we need to remember dynos are only tools to be used and not get wrapped around the #'s. We all know stock STis (04-07) with the same mods barely see 300whp @ those boost levels. Anyways, you must be loving the way it turned out for you, with that amount of torque at 3k rpms must be amazing. Two thumbs up
25rsti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 03:09 PM   #19
[D.I.]WRX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 116314
Join Date: May 2006
Chapter/Region: SCIC
Location: San Diego
Default

That's some awesome results. Them vf52's on the new WRx's are insane power makers. I'm jealous How does it compare to your 06 Wrx with a vf39?
[D.I.]WRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 06:25 PM   #20
fourmicah
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 128760
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Over there>
Vehicle:
2017 STI
Silver

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 25rsti View Post
Though I/we need to remember dynos are only tools to be used and not get wrapped around the #'s.
This I understand, but when the numbers are this far north of the norm, questions need to be asked because it seems as though the correction factors are messed with to make it appear that the car is faster than it really is. Then you have a 330 WHP car that won't trap 99 MPH. Not saying this is that car, but it has been done.
fourmicah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 07:21 PM   #21
scramjett
*** Banned ***
 
Member#: 192526
Join Date: Oct 2008
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Vehicle:
2008 WRX FMIC/VF48
Red/Steel Grey

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fourmicah View Post
This I understand, but when the numbers are this far north of the norm, questions need to be asked because it seems as though the correction factors are messed with to make it appear that the car is faster than it really is. Then you have a 330 WHP car that won't trap 99 MPH. Not saying this is that car, but it has been done.
Those numbers really remind me of P&L started selling/tuning VF48's and they were making north of 320whp and touting it as good as an 18G.

As someone who has a VF48 (which is the same as a VF52 but for the flange), and having injectors, intake, full TBE, a FMIC..... My car doesn't make 18G power and I can tell you that being tuned on 93 octane, as I am tuned, +320whp ain't happening. Its a fun ride, but +320 is a bit much to expect from the tiny but capable vf48/52. And 300whp at redline...... No way! What is this, a 68hta?

Ah hell, we're all on the same Subie fan club at the end of the day! Ciao!
scramjett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 08:29 PM   #22
synolimit
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 225225
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: medina, oh
Vehicle:
11 WRX
335HP, 394TQ, 93 VF52!!

Default

wow mcangz and Redfitz your tuner in nuts!! my tuner deams 90% IDC to be safe. for me at 290hp and 311TQ thats only 17psi with catted TBE, CAI, UP, LWP, 255 pump and 3-port EBCS. theres no way you two are safe running 19-20psi!! forget the hp numbers, you guys have headers which ive heard can make a lot of power and torque so i cant comment. we tryed 18psi but the intercooler was to hot up top so we had to back off but we were hitting 225TQ around 3k ish. so your TQ seems right for 19-20psi. but again you guys have to be at 100-110% IDC=not good!
synolimit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 08:32 PM   #23
Byzantium
*** Banned ***
 
Member#: 207826
Join Date: Apr 2009
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: Katabatic
Vehicle:
85k 2002 WRX
Correct Fitment Crew #034

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by synolimit View Post
forget the hp numbers, you guys have headers which ive heard can make a lot of power and torque so i cant comment
PnPing headers are not done for power. It's done to decrease spool time. If he is making power from it, it's nothing to take notice of.
Byzantium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 08:37 PM   #24
synolimit
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 225225
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: medina, oh
Vehicle:
11 WRX
335HP, 394TQ, 93 VF52!!

Default

also has anyone else noticed the 7300rpm!!! funny how mine hits fuel cut 6500rpm

Last edited by synolimit; 02-16-2010 at 09:34 AM.
synolimit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 08:38 PM   #25
synolimit
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 225225
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: medina, oh
Vehicle:
11 WRX
335HP, 394TQ, 93 VF52!!

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Byzantium View Post
PnPing headers are not done for power. It's done to decrease spool time. If he is making power from it, it's nothing to take notice of.
its still a some what rated 5-15hp and tq
synolimit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS:(CO) Stock 08-09 WRX TD04 Turbo HKSpowerWRX Engine/Power/Exhaust 7 04-04-2011 10:32 AM
09 wrx - stock turbo - 93octane - 290HP, 311TQ synolimit Proven Power Bragging 56 11-04-2010 05:21 PM
09 WRX stock turbo 312 whp, 352 wtq Innovative Tuning Proven Power Bragging 5 05-20-2010 07:43 PM
09 WRX stock turbo 293 whp, 304 wtq Innovative Tuning Proven Power Bragging 20 03-14-2010 08:43 PM
WTB: 06-09 wrx stock TD04 turbo eddie8890 Private 'Wanted' Classifieds 4 05-03-2009 09:17 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2024 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2019, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission
Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.