|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-11-2008, 01:24 PM | #1 |
Former Vendor
Member#: 171509
Join Date: Feb 2008
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Danbury, CT
|
2006 Subaru STi - *NEW* AMR Font Mount Intercooler (FMIC), AMR BMI, Much More!!!!!
*First excuse the typo on the title of the thread
Numbers Dyno: Dyno Dynamics Tuner: AutoMaster AMR Wheel HP: 306whp (stock 200-210whp) Wheel TQ: 340wtq (stock 200-210wtq) Car Info Year: 2006 Engine Management: COBB APv2 - AMR PROTuned Turbo: STOCK Intercooler: AMR Race Front Mount Intercooler w/ Optional: TiAL 50mm BOV Injectors: PE 850cc Injectors Intake/Inlet: AMR BMI Cold Air System Headers: AMR Headers w/ AMR Up-Pipe Downpipe: Aftermarket Turbo Back Exhaust System (Catless) Other Power Mods: - Walbro 255 Fuel Pump - Aftermarket Manual Boost Controller Dyno Sheet: Boost Chart: DYNO VIDEO: Uploading... Notes: One thing that NEEDS attention on this vehicle would be the aftermarket manual boost controller. The boost controller is not functioning correctly. I do not know the brand but it does not hold boost well at all. As you can see from the severe drop off, the vehicle still has another 10-15whp in it. Customer will be coming back and switching it out for our AMR Electronic Boost Control Solenoid. Tuning: AFR: 11.0 Boost: 20psi @ 3300rpm - SEVERE TAPER to 12psi TIMING: Conservative Intercooler: This vehicle is equipped with our *NEW* AMR RACE Front Mount Intercooler and suitted with our AMR BMI Cold Air System. -Rob
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Last edited by AMR; 10-11-2008 at 02:01 PM. |
10-11-2008, 02:12 PM | #2 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 96452
Join Date: Sep 2005
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Pennsylvania
Vehicle:So, what to play with next ? |
Wow. hahahaha. Reading pwns me LOL !. Good stuff.
|
10-11-2008, 04:27 PM | #3 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 154549
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Vehicle:2006 DOM 3 Powered WHITE/ EQ Tuned 350Whp |
nice set up me like a lot
|
10-12-2008, 07:28 AM | #4 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 63179
Join Date: Jun 2004
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: THANKs CrucialRacing, EQTuning
Vehicle:2006 Stock Turbo STi [email protected] VF39 |
sorry
something dont make sense here] i dont mean to come out here and call you guys out on this, but i feel i should since this is a lil bit too crazy. i normally dont care about dyno numbers this one is really wierd to me 200 - 210whp baseline and you gain 100whp or more with " conservative timing " " broken boost control peaking at 20psi taper to 12 " with only 20psi im assuming your on pump gas 93? i have one of the most powerful vf39 car out there and the 3rd fastest has similar numbers as i do. so lets compare our dyno numbers from baseline to gain. my numbers are baseline 210 - 220whp with 20 psi i only was able to gain 60-70whp from baseline. with 25psi i was only able gained 120 - 125whp from baseline. based on the dyno numbers shown of this car at 20psi and the performance parts and other tuning infos this car has gained 100 - 105whp with just 20psi tapering down to 12psi with " conservative timing " and a "broken" boost controller and you even go as far stating that 10 - 15whp more if the boost controller was functioning right. thats like 115 - 120whp gain from 200 - 210whp baseline on stock turbo with only 20psi if the boost controller worked right i mean come on now.. thats also like saying this car at 20psi is as powerful as top 5 stock turboed STi and those top 5 are atleast 24 psi and alteast on stright 100 octane with much much aggressive timing my car and 3rd fastest only gained 120 - 125whp at best with basicly with tune far from conservative. and all our parts were properly functioning at best and we were boosting @ 25psi - tapering to 17 - 18psi to redline think about it. if this car ever to get tune on c16 @ 25psi with everything functioning right, and on " aggressive timing " based on the info up top id prolly gain another 80 - 100whp thats gonna be over 390 - 400whp on a dyno that baseline 200 - 210whp based on the dyno baseline and its gain this car and my dyno baseline and my gain, baseline to gain this car should be able to trap 114 - 115mph with just 20psi and again imagine it on 25psi this car will end up trapping 119 - 121mph i mean thats just crazy... plz explain more of this set up something is fishy here Last edited by downsti; 10-12-2008 at 07:46 AM. |
10-12-2008, 08:29 AM | #5 |
*** Banned ***
Member#: 190163
Join Date: Sep 2008
Vehicle:> - Giggity Goo '93 Typhoon |
Jealous? Have you backed up your incredible high 11 sec. time yet? How long has it been since that remarkable time? That is fishy..........and both you guys have great fast awesome Suburus.
|
10-12-2008, 04:57 PM | #6 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 63179
Join Date: Jun 2004
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: THANKs CrucialRacing, EQTuning
Vehicle:2006 Stock Turbo STi [email protected] VF39 |
how im i jealous?
track numbers > dyno numbers since we talking about power then, i trap 115.6 mph im just trying to make sense here. and why dont you ask ctr to also back up his 11 second time.. and other that dipped into 10s once and ran 11s all day? this looks to be another false advertisement of parts using dyno numbers and who the hell are you? didnt you get banned b4? Last edited by downsti; 10-12-2008 at 05:14 PM. |
10-12-2008, 05:47 PM | #7 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 100274
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I think these numbers are normal for AMR. I know they have a few cars into the 10's but all their posts lately seem to have huge, huge gains.
I mean, cars with stock location upgraded turbos gaining 200whp. Their baseline claims are extremely low. Most tuners are gaining 40-60whp on STI's while these guys are gaining 100whp. |
10-12-2008, 05:54 PM | #8 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 148681
Join Date: May 2007
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: WI
Vehicle:TBD Looking for STI Back in the Game! |
Quote:
I have a fully built SB and a 30R and only make about 250WHP more a stock STI on Q16 map @29psi. |
|
10-12-2008, 07:33 PM | #9 | |
*** Banned ***
Member#: 190163
Join Date: Sep 2008
Vehicle:> - Giggity Goo '93 Typhoon |
Quote:
example - I ran a 8.98@116 a few years ago @Morroso in my Ty . Next run was 11.2@115, then 11.08@116. Each run felt the same to me and my datamaster was showing me perfection on each run. You tell me; Did I really run a 8.98? |
|
10-12-2008, 07:43 PM | #10 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 148681
Join Date: May 2007
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: WI
Vehicle:TBD Looking for STI Back in the Game! |
We all know Downs 1/4 mile rep thats all I was saying and yes I am familiar with 2nd run and I highly doubt that the 8.98@116 was correct
Welcome to PPB its never a nice place |
10-12-2008, 07:52 PM | #11 |
*** Banned ***
Member#: 190163
Join Date: Sep 2008
Vehicle:> - Giggity Goo '93 Typhoon |
Glad to be here and envy most of you guys!
|
10-12-2008, 08:00 PM | #12 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 63179
Join Date: Jun 2004
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: THANKs CrucialRacing, EQTuning
Vehicle:2006 Stock Turbo STi [email protected] VF39 |
Quote:
this car has nothing to do with slip numbers. I merely stating that this car WILL NOT gain 100 - 105whp which on stock turbo with a broken boost controller set at 20 psi and tapering to 12psi with a CONSERVATIVE Timing come on baseline 200 - 210whp to 306whp with conservative timing with a broken boost controller set at 20 psi tapering to 12psi and he even goes out saying this car will gain another 10 - 15whp if the boost controller was working right? you tell me does that make sense? this STOCK TURBOED STI on 20psi is in the level with turbos size like fpgreen, dom3.0, atp30 on 20psi again tell me that make sense? Last edited by downsti; 10-12-2008 at 08:10 PM. |
|
10-12-2008, 09:08 PM | #13 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 171509
Join Date: Feb 2008
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Danbury, CT
|
Quote:
I understand were you are coming from. But one thing everyone on here knows by now is, our numbers are dead on with our trap speeds. I read your post on your E.T. pass with your VF39. We have nothing to prove. If the vehicle makes power thats great. Especially if the vehicle has a very good engine. We do tons of VF39 tunes, though I do not post every single one of them. I only post the ones that catch my eye such as this vehicle here. The customer being happy along with his TRAP SPEED at the track matches his POWER made on our dyno, thats all that really matters. The proof is in the pudding. Especially now and the upcoming months ahead with the temperature dropping, you will being seeing alot of cars putting down great numbers and really good E.T./Trap Speeds. -Rob |
|
10-12-2008, 10:40 PM | #14 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 63179
Join Date: Jun 2004
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: THANKs CrucialRacing, EQTuning
Vehicle:2006 Stock Turbo STi [email protected] VF39 |
yea im not trying to stir anything up here. not at all
like i said im just trying to make sense of this heres the thing when you said your dyno numbers match up with your trap speeds, your forgetting those set up are completely different from stock turbo. which stock turbo has no top end. compared to those cars you have taken down the 1/4mile for the trapspeed im sure you also know power band plays a huge roll in trapspeed. as well as 60 foot so what did he trap on the 1/4mile... and yes dyno numbers is only creditable if its has trapspeed to back it up. cuz we know dyno numbers can be altered |
10-12-2008, 10:59 PM | #15 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 21445
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: bay area, ca
Vehicle:08 STI silver |
wait so let me get this straight... this car has 315-320whp in it on pump gas with a stock turbo @ 20psi??
my GT30 08 sti made 330whp at 20psi... Damn, i put equal length headers, TGV deletes, colder plugs, a GT30 rotated kit and it also has the addition of exhaust side AVCS.... Damn, that means i only make 10whp more than a stock turbo sti with a GT30 and all that extra stuff. And the dyno i got dyno'd on has stock STIs making 210whp as well. anyone else think this and various other claims by AMR have some rather questionable or inflated dyno numbers? |
10-12-2008, 11:01 PM | #16 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 21445
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: bay area, ca
Vehicle:08 STI silver |
damn... look out evos.... this car will make 400whp TWICE AS MUCH AS STOCK and run 9s with just C16... stock turbo BEAST!!
|
10-12-2008, 11:03 PM | #17 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 21445
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: bay area, ca
Vehicle:08 STI silver |
also... my car baselined at 211whp.... then i put turbo back exhaust, intake, colder plugs and tuned on racegas keeping the stock turbo and i still made less than what this car makes on pump gas.
|
10-12-2008, 11:55 PM | #18 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 119777
Join Date: Jul 2006
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Chicago, IL
Vehicle:2013 BRZ SWP |
I baselined around 210, and with a VF48 and supporting mods gained 105whp. Only difference is my baseline was a TD04. I'm interested to see what this car would trap.
|
10-13-2008, 03:39 AM | #19 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 127428
Join Date: Sep 2006
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
|
Any slips going to be posted soon so you can back this up ?
|
10-13-2008, 08:31 AM | #20 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 67182
Join Date: Jul 2004
Vehicle:2004 Subaru STi 11.0 @ 128mph - 93/Meth |
Quote:
Check your tuner. I used this thing called the search button. This is what I came up with: 2006 STi - 10.72 @ 130 http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...ght=automaster 2004 STi FP Red: 11.0 on Pump Gas: ttp://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1336338&highlight=amr 2004 STi - 11.3 @ 130 http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=amr 2008 STi T50R: 11.56 on Pump Gas: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=amr 2008 STi - Just a Tune: 12.8 on Pump Gas: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=amr David's 2008 STi - Just a Tune: 12.9 on Pump Gas: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=amr 2004 STi FP Red: 11.44 on Pump Gas: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=amr 2008 STi AMR STAGE 2 - 12.4 on Pump Gas http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=amr ALL AMR tune and built cars. The proof is in the pudding. I can keep going but I figured the point is proven. They have already proven themselves. No need to keep backing it up. Congrats AMR keep up the great work!! |
|
10-13-2008, 10:37 AM | #21 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 151683
Join Date: Jun 2007
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
|
haha, the T50R 08 went 115 mph... haha, thats a good way to back up AMR.. how did downsti trap that(actually .6 mph faster) with the 39???
I'm not dissing AMR, but someone said "the proof is in the pudding" and "their dyno numbers match their trap speeds" ... 115 is just "decent" with that size turbo.. apples to oranges but why does that dude in the 18g wrx run 125?? the first time i ever drove my buddy's 18g wrx, again apples to oranges, i went 110 with a reeeeally ****ty tune and 100k+ miles on the car, at 21 psi on pump... down, ur the man homie, you need to go out and run that 11.7 again and **** on all the haters, again.. |
10-13-2008, 11:27 AM | #22 | |
Former Vendor
Member#: 171509
Join Date: Feb 2008
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Danbury, CT
|
Quote:
The 2008 STi with the T50R weighs 3548. So you are not comparing apples to apples. Also this was on 93 octane. The 18G is pushing 30psi and in a much LIGHTER vehicle. I had read his post and congrats to the owner of that vehicle. But it also weighs 2800-2900 lbs. Again, that 2008 STi you are comparing it to weighs 3548. -Rob |
|
10-13-2008, 11:30 AM | #23 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 149426
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle:2002 Subaru WRX 2005 Subaru STi & 2000 RS |
Great Job AMR!!
Lets not forget about MY 18G tuned by AMR. Link: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...hlight=18g+amr I went 12.4 @ 110mph with 142k on the car. |
10-15-2008, 06:30 AM | #24 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 63179
Join Date: Jun 2004
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: THANKs CrucialRacing, EQTuning
Vehicle:2006 Stock Turbo STi [email protected] VF39 |
SO wheres the Trapspeed time of this car?
Quote:
DID YOU NOT READY MY POST? why are you bringing up cars that is completely different from this stock turboed STi? do you know that those cars have completely different built? bring up some set up that is very close to this car then will compare that -------------------------- okay check this out : http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=amr 2008 STi Wheel HP: 270whp (stock 201whp) Wheel TQ: 280wtq (stock 225wtq) Mod: stock everything just COLD AIR INTAKE and Tuned ( i assume 93 octane, and less than 20psi since no info was givin ) .................................................. VS........................................... this car http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=amr 2008 STi Wheel HP: 282whp (stock 201whp) Wheel TQ: 300wtq (stock 225wtq) Mod List : Open Downpipe , Cold Air intake and Tuned on 100 octane mix 93 no clear @ 24 psi so your telling me this 2008 STi with Open downpipe car with cold air intake tuned on 100 octane mix @ 24psi only makes 12 whp and 20wtq more than this 2008 STi with just cold air intake tuned on 93 prolly less than 20psi WHAT THE HELL? that dont make sense.... at all ----------------------------------- now lets compare those two 2008 STi to the OP's car 2006 STi Wheel HP: 306whp (stock 200-210whp) Wheel TQ: 340wtq (stock 200-210wtq) with .Broken. Boost Contorller set @ 20psi tapering to 12psi with " CONSERVATIVE TUNE " lets analyze his Power Mods : AP2 - ( Tools to use to tune the car ) Fuel Pump - ( Added safety, No power gain ) Injectors - ( added safety, No power gain ) Boost controller ( tuners preference to control the boost, No power gain) maybe boost resposne Headers - ( No big noticeable power gain on Stock Turbo Especially at that boost level) boost response maybe? Uppipe - ( very very very lil gain, mainly for boost response ) Turboback Exhaust - ( 20 - 25whp on low reading dyno ) Cold Air intake - ( much debated power increase, some say no real gains , some say lots of gains ) FMIC - ( no gain in my opinion, stock turbo is far too small to make a huge FMIC efficient. ) so now this car gain 24whp and 40wqt with those mods above? with a Broken Boost controller set at 20psi Tapering down to 12 psi compared to this 2008 STi with Open DP and Cold air intake tuned at 24psi on 100 octane mix? again what the hell? with pump gas 20psi tapering down to 12psi, headers, uppipe, you will most likely see not any damn gain, as for FMIC his prolly loosing power due to pressure drop and Lag due to longer distance for air to travel. for injectors, fuel pump, boost controllers, are mainly added safety for the tuning. other they will not make any power. maybe the newly made and advertise FMIC has some kinda hidden power to it Last edited by downsti; 10-15-2008 at 07:47 AM. |
|
10-15-2008, 09:19 AM | #25 |
Former Vendor
Member#: 171509
Join Date: Feb 2008
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Danbury, CT
|
Downsti,
No reason to get all worked up. The customer is satisfied with his vehicle. He knows he is more then welcome to take it to the track and/or dyno the vehicle some place else if he likes. I guarantee you the power increase will be the same. Again, we have nothing to prove. We have been in this business for a very long time. As far as what SuperSTi posted. He was just stating that we "get the job done and our customers vehicles all perform". All that matters is that our customers are satisfied and there vehicles perform at the track. Thats the bottom line. Now, lets keep this thread clean. -Rob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMR Build: Performance Chemicals, LLC. 2006 Subaru STi - 800+whp - MONSTER BUILD! | AMR | NASIOC Project Cars | 82 | 03-05-2010 05:58 PM |
02-07 Subaru Impreza WRX or STi Front Mount Intercooler FMIC Piping Included See More | 02WRX1989 | NESIC Private Classifieds | 7 | 08-26-2009 09:37 PM |
FS: (NY) AMR Top Mount Intercooler - 2008 STi - Low miles, best TMIC on the market!! | iwanasubi | Engine/Power/Exhaust | 4 | 06-30-2009 03:34 PM |
2006 Subaru STi - GT52 / Meth / 25psi / AMR REFLASH | AMR | Proven Power Bragging | 28 | 03-17-2008 10:08 AM |