|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-24-2008, 09:46 PM | #1 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 158866
Join Date: Sep 2007
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Location: Buckeye,AZ
Vehicle:'98 S14/'93 impreza Nissan Super Black |
Lightweight crank pulley + Lightweight Flywheel. OK or Not ?
anybody running these mods with any problems? i have read countless write-ups on the lightweight crank pully but how many of us are running it with a 9.5 flywheel and is it a good idea?
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
04-24-2008, 11:16 PM | #2 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 106510
Join Date: Feb 2006
Chapter/Region:
VIC
Location: Osoyoos, BC
Vehicle:98 Widebody 3.4L Smooth Safety Blue |
Ive been having trouble with stalling when I come to a stop with a lightweight flywheel + lightweight pulley.
Dont know if thats the cause tho. |
04-25-2008, 04:59 AM | #3 |
Sammo Hung
Moderator Member#: 10613
Join Date: Sep 2001
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: N Fla / S Ga
Vehicle:2002 USDM WRX WRB |
well you could get cel.
13 lbs flywheel will not get you a cel. but both lightened flywheel & pulley will get a cel. so after about 20~30 pulley / flywheel combos. what we found was flywheels lighter than 13 lbs highly increase your chances of getting a cel for misfire due the lighter weight of rotating mass. also 13 lbs with lighten pulley increased the chances for misfire cel from crank sensor. yes there are some cars that might not give these codes. but the majority of the cars have thrown the code for misfire.. you also reflash your ecu rom file and turn off the cel for crank sensor misfire. but there is always a good and bad side to things. pretty sure this was already discussed and if you searched you could have gotten the answers you're looking for. and the combinations that work & don't work. Last edited by jaxscuby; 04-26-2008 at 10:19 AM. Reason: moaning & groaning |
04-25-2008, 07:43 AM | #4 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 64494
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Vehicle:2001 V7 sti |
The day I can read braille with my ass I'll go for a lightened crank pulley.
|
04-25-2008, 12:13 PM | #5 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 158006
Join Date: Aug 2007
Chapter/Region:
TXIC
Location: San Antonio
Vehicle:2003 WRX IdleWagon 1992 GVR4 379/1000 |
I have both and never had a CEL.
Perrin Pulley with a 13 lb ACT flywheel. It's on an STI plate in my wrx 5 speed box. I redline it to 7200+ and have never had any CEL from it. I vote we change the canned response to this question, which has been asked before, from "You WILL get a CEL." to "You very well MIGHT get a CEL, but at least one person in the world has run both, and never had a CEL. His name is Brox, and either he is a sorcerer, a liar, or very lucky." /Brox |
04-25-2008, 12:35 PM | #6 |
Former Vendor
Member#: 79304
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: FL
Vehicle:CALL 941-257-9618 www.ImportImageRacing.com |
not a problem on our 06 sti
we used act streetlite flywheel (13lbs) gimmick motorsports lightweight crank pulley and acpt carbon fiber driveshaft...which is much less then just flywheel and pulley no issues |
04-25-2008, 12:44 PM | #7 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 129711
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Camarillo CA,
Vehicle:1999 2.5 RS Aspen White |
-what is this car used for, if DD i wouldnt suggest the combo, the lightened flywheel really drops the rotating mass and you have to really get it moving again aka slip the clutch a bit.
if you want to be more competitve at the track then the freaking thing rocks, blipping the throttle for shifts is great and coming out of turns and shifting up is awesome. if you are in traffic alot prepare to suffah! |
04-25-2008, 12:48 PM | #8 |
Former Vendor
Member#: 79304
Join Date: Jan 2005
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: FL
Vehicle:CALL 941-257-9618 www.ImportImageRacing.com |
why would you suffer in traffic? if you use the 9.5 flywheel which chatters..yes it would get annoying. but using any higher end clutch would be annoying in traffic. although even an exedy 3 puck stage 2 was fine with this combo in traffic...and it has next to no give. really all its going to do is let you rev faster/go through the gears faster. i can see your point in stop and go traffic for the quicker revs and using the clutch a little more, but if you have a beefy one, its not an issue. also cutting 1.6 60ft's on the stock clutch, she lasted a long time, in fact she never wore out, we just replaced her when we did the larger turbo setup.
|
04-25-2008, 01:05 PM | #9 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 130276
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Putnam, CT
Vehicle:2004 STi JBP |
I ran a act pro lite (9 pound) and perrin pulley with my hybrid. Had to idle it at 1100 and pull a little bit of idle timing to 100% prevent stalling, but with how snappy it is around town, and how quick the revs go up and down, I liked it a lot better than the stock flywheel with perrin pulley like I run now. Ran the 2002 WRX rom and never ever a CEL. If your car doesnt misfire, it wont get a cel. And you can reflash to an updated ROM if you have the old 02 rom that throws phantom misfire codes even stock... the whole "it will throw a CEL" stereotype is from the early 02 WRX's.. and no other cars apply to that thinking....
|
04-25-2008, 02:22 PM | #10 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 158885
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
jobxiii's car is his daily driver. I helped him put it together. Specifically, he's using the Fidanza 9.5lb flywheel and a Cobb (i think) lightweight pulley. He also has a ClutchMasters clutch (FX200 if I remember right)
I don't think his CEL is on, but I will check with him today at work. His real question is, is it safe to use both on a DD car? There have been numerous threads here and elsewhere that claim that this combo will cause problems like timing belt jumping and bearings going out. |
04-25-2008, 03:43 PM | #11 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 129711
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Camarillo CA,
Vehicle:1999 2.5 RS Aspen White |
perfectly safe! it required more work to get the car moving, and being in socal traffic FTL.
imho Great for track not street. |
04-25-2008, 11:22 PM | #12 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 158006
Join Date: Aug 2007
Chapter/Region:
TXIC
Location: San Antonio
Vehicle:2003 WRX IdleWagon 1992 GVR4 379/1000 |
I DD'd my wagon every day with the pulley and flywheel. I did notice it was harder but not difficult, to get moving, especially in reverse. I originally chalked it up to the STI clutch which also went in at the same time.
As for a real benefit, the thing I noticed was using launch control. 2 WRX 2.0's set up at the same LC point, mine would bounce faster than the one with no weight off the crank. It was small but noticeable so the rev faster concept I would agree with. It also comes off rpm faster as well which is why I am switching back to the stock pulley when the dogbox goes in. /Brox |
04-26-2008, 12:31 AM | #13 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 125304
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crawford, TX.
|
I think a lightweight pulley is detrimental to the front of the suby motor. It doesn't have any hormonics control throughout the rpm range. This also causes hormonics in the oil pump and may cause oil pressure problems at high rpms.
wittmer 25 runs a light flywheel in a 04 sti and it creates cels at low rpm when you decelerate. He is also using a ATI front balancer because he wants his motor to last for awhile. I have a brand new perrin I installed and removed before I decided on the ATI balancer I will sell if someone wants it. I also have another brand that also came with a altenator pulley that I will sell. Last edited by charliew; 05-02-2008 at 06:13 PM. |
04-26-2008, 02:38 AM | #14 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 158885
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
After a bit of debate, we decided that the stock pulley is going back on.
Considering the weight reduction in the flywheel, I don't think there will much of a noticable difference in driving between the pulleys. We think the few added pounds are worth the assurance. Better safe than sorry. Only one slight problem... After cleaning the garage after the project, the stock pulley managed to end up in the trash. Soooo... If you happen to have a stock crank pulley for an 04 STI for cheap, please PM jobxiii. Thanks to all of you for your input on the matter. |
04-26-2008, 08:44 AM | #15 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 95840
Join Date: Sep 2005
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Pasco, WA
Vehicle:sold to a good bud awaiting next car |
IMO, the only pully i'd put on that was "light weight" is the ARFab crank pulley.
BTW, i love my exedy twin plate. |
04-26-2008, 09:00 AM | #16 | |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 5810
Join Date: Apr 2001
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Easton PA
Vehicle:2001 S366 2.5RS |
Quote:
|
|
04-26-2008, 09:16 AM | #17 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 95840
Join Date: Sep 2005
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Pasco, WA
Vehicle:sold to a good bud awaiting next car |
|
04-26-2008, 10:43 AM | #18 | |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 33782
Join Date: Mar 2003
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Vehicle:96 3MI Racing search FIRST, then PM!!! |
Quote:
have you ever spun or balanced a factory crank and seen how far off it is? just because by design it is "balance" doesn't mean it is real world balaced. I will never run a lightened pulley/flywheel. the only way I would is if both were independantly balanced and the rotating assembly was balanced either perfectly or to spec WAAAYYY beyond what the motor would be seeing. so like I said, I would never run them combined. Harmonics and unbalanced components are one worry I will keep 2 lbs in rotating mass to keep my engine safe. Its insurance, especially when you are going to spin high rpms. |
|
04-26-2008, 11:10 AM | #19 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 5810
Join Date: Apr 2001
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Easton PA
Vehicle:2001 S366 2.5RS |
^^ agreed, but you gotta admit the RPMS needed to actually really do any harm is up high for an extended amount of time. Im talking around 8kish
Of course I've been wrong before But I don't think I've ever seen anyone say that a lightened pulley was the cause to an engine failure. |
04-27-2008, 05:33 PM | #20 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 125304
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crawford, TX.
|
Subys buy design are balanced good enough for your wife to go to the store in the snow. They are not as easy to balance as a honda. There is not enough room to add the needed weight easily. Bad harmonics is hard to pin down but the engineers in the racing world use very well designed balancers. Don't talk about light weight pulleys until you have studied the harmonics produced in a motor. Do you actually think the manufacturer's would put one on if they didn't think it is needed. And don't you think nascar would be using them if they were better?
Check out what brand balancer nascar uses. The high performance suby needs all the high tech balancing you can buy. This has been discussed very throughly here before. The stock balancer is like any other, it is designed for a very limited rpm range. It's good for regular driving. Also the 2.0 stock pulley is different from the 2.5 pulley. why would they redesign the pulley if it's not necessary? Oh yeah the 04 sti pulley appears to be the same part that goes on the other 2.5 motors. It is a three piece balancer. The 2.0 is a two piece. Last edited by charliew; 04-27-2008 at 05:46 PM. |
04-27-2008, 09:10 PM | #21 | |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 41323
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Granger IN
Vehicle:2002 WRX Sedona |
Quote:
|
|
04-27-2008, 09:23 PM | #22 |
Scooby Guru
Member#: 106510
Join Date: Feb 2006
Chapter/Region:
VIC
Location: Osoyoos, BC
Vehicle:98 Widebody 3.4L Smooth Safety Blue |
I havent had any problems with stalling since I switched back to the stock crank pulley., and honestly thats the only difference Ive noticed. Engine still revs wicked fast.
|
04-28-2008, 11:39 AM | #23 |
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 130276
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Putnam, CT
Vehicle:2004 STi JBP |
Put a 2.0 pulley on the front of your 2.5 if you want a lighter pulley that still has harmonic dampening capability... It weighs about half as much...
|
04-30-2008, 09:52 AM | #24 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 149467
Join Date: May 2007
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: philly burbs
Vehicle:2004 STi WRB |
Im running a perrin lightweight crank pulley with ACT streetlite flywheel also the motor is built and the internals are lighter and I have no stalling or cels.
|
04-30-2008, 02:41 PM | #25 |
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 83716
Join Date: Mar 2005
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Everett, WA
Vehicle:'04 Burn-Up WRX Black |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Light flywheel w/ lightweight crank pulley problems? | sabingr | North West Impreza Club Forum -- NWIC | 7 | 12-29-2008 08:05 PM |
wtb--new or used COBB lightweight crank pulley--BLUE | skate enjoi | Private 'Wanted' Classifieds | 8 | 08-19-2008 09:51 AM |
Lightweight crank pulley and flywheel question | GochYou | Transmission (AT/MT) & Driveline | 5 | 03-09-2008 07:19 AM |
wtb: perrin or cobb lightweight crank pulley | 04silv3rSTI | Private 'Wanted' Classifieds | 0 | 03-13-2007 11:29 PM |
lightweight crank pulley or lightweight flywheel? | imprezey | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 16 | 06-02-2003 04:01 AM |