|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|||||||




![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 11221
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Rocklin, California
Vehicle:2002 2.5 RS Black as Midnight!!! |
Ok, so Iv seen a few intakes, but have a quastion...
ASIDE from cold air, what is so benificial about keeping the stock air box and filter with a gansflow (one choice) versus a cone filter that goes RIGHT before the throttle body. Wouldnt the cone filter provide better throttle responce and low end torque due to the fact that there is NO intake piping, therefore no restriction and immediate air. Just a question of physics...as my last car had a terrible intake cuz it was over 7' long stretched out.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 2817
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: NYC and Troy, NY
Vehicle:2001 Impreza 2.5RS BRP |
Problem with a cone filter is that it sucks hot air because it has to sit close to the engine. If it didn't, it will give you more high-end power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 11221
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Rocklin, California
Vehicle:2002 2.5 RS Black as Midnight!!! |
I said DISREGAURDING cold air
I mean, I KNOW cold air is a major factor....but Im talking that if the temps entering the throttle body were identical...which intake would be better? the cone on the throttle body or the gansflow with the stock filter box |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 2817
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: NYC and Troy, NY
Vehicle:2001 Impreza 2.5RS BRP |
Oops, didn't read the thread carefully.
Anyway, the stock airbox acts as a air reservoir and it does help keeping the low-end torque when new intake is installed. I was always told that I needed to trade one power to get another. If I want to increase low-end torque, I have to somehow sacrifice high-end power. Just like the exhaust, if you speed up the air movement in the car, you'll increase the efficiency and high-end power, but lose some low-end torque. To summarize, if you use the cone filter, you probably end up losing some low-end torque while increasing the high-end power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
over boosted again
Moderator Member#: 1458
Join Date: May 2000
Chapter/Region:
RMIC
Location: Colorado Springs CO USA
Vehicle:2006 B9 Tribeca LTD 2005 Impreza 2.5 RS |
The cone filter on the TB does lose quite a bit of low end power. Even the cone filter at the end of a long tube has that problem.
I have had several people who switched from a Weapon-R or JC Sports "tube style" intake for a GanzFlow and been very happy with the upgrade to a GanzFlow. Larry Ganz www.SubaruPlanet.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 8465
Join Date: Jul 2001
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Vehicle:'00 2.5RS Coupe, AW '93 GMC Typhoon AWD |
Here is a quote taken directly from Cobb's website:
Quote:
Richard http://www.whitetyphoon.com/impreza/ |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Yes an intake question...which "big" intakes fit w/TXS FMIC? | Wrx_Fan_0717 | Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain | 7 | 11-30-2008 12:10 AM |
| cold air intake question | Norris | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 24 | 06-06-2001 10:08 AM |
| Intake Question | CRZ_MSL | SVX Forum Archive | 4 | 11-29-2000 03:59 PM |
| Intake question | ADIL | Legacy Forum | 18 | 04-28-2000 05:20 AM |
| Weapon R intake Question Install | finnstr | New England Impreza Club Forum -- NESIC | 0 | 04-23-2000 10:03 AM |