Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Tuesday October 21, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > News & Rumors > Non-Subaru News & Rumors

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2006, 05:24 PM   #1
NYCshopper
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 5126
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: www.nugateway.com
Default 2007 Acura RDX review by CNet

2007 Acura RDX review by CNet

http://reviews.cnet.com/2007_Acura_R...-32027883.html



Quote:
CNET editors' review
Spectacular
9.0 out of 10

The good: The 2007 Acura RDX is a very fun car to drive, with a peppy engine and excellent handling. It has one of the best-sounding stereo systems we've heard, as part of its Technology package, which also includes voice-command Bluetooth integration and navigation. The navigation system has live traffic reporting.

The bad: With all the included cabin technology, Acura should have worked on a more integrated interface.

The bottom line: The 2007 Acura RDX is a good value, with practical interior space and very good drivability. Techies will delight in its cabin systems, but luddites will be overwhelmed by the many buttons and voice commands.

Looking at the body of the 2007 Acura RDX, we couldn't help but think of it as a truck, until we got behind the wheel. And that's the essence of a crossover--the industry's new favorite vehicle type--a vehicle that combines the utility of an SUV with the drivability of a car (and maybe some of the fuel economy). In an interesting design note, the RDX looks a little like a boat when viewed head-on, thanks to the way the underside is raked up toward the front bumper.

The RDX is smaller than other crossovers we've tested recently, such as the Mazda CX-7 and the Ford Edge. It feels quicker and more agile. The interior isn't particularly roomy, although seating position is higher than in a sedan. The driver's seat gets 10-way power adjustment, but the front passenger seat has manual controls. We also discovered that front legroom is minimal, with one of our 6-foot-plus review staff brushing the dashboard with his knees--even with the seat all the way back. As a nice touch, the center console hatch is very wide and deep, with room enough for a couple of laptops.

All the tech that fits
Acura chose to make the RDX a tech powerhouse, including a similar Technology package to the one available on the Acura RL, a previous winner of our Tech Car of the Year award. The Technology package includes Bluetooth cell phone integration, voice recognition, and navigation with live traffic information. But the RDX takes it a step further by adding an excellent stereo system. While we like all of this technology, Acura didn't do a good job of making the interface very usable, mounting buttons wherever they fit around the dashboard and steering wheel.

The main interface for the RDX is a LCD screen mounted at the top of the stack, with function buttons and a joystick/dial right below it. The joystick/dial is big enough that it's easy to use, even while driving. But the software interface isn't so good, as it's difficult to determine from what's on the screen whether the dial should be turned or the joystick moved to make a menu selection. A CD changer sits at the bottom of the stack, and has some duplicative controls to those displayed on the LCD screen. Unfortunately, the lower stereo controls don't mirror the look of the screen controls at all. Further complicating things, there are no Bluetooth phone controls on the screen, as they're relegated to a voice command system.



The steering wheel has controls for the stereo, cruise control, voice commands, and telephone--we counted 13 separate buttons in all. And to further illustrate this interface mess, there are two buttons for accessing telephone voice commands between the left and lower spoke of the wheel. There is also another set of two buttons below these two telephone buttons for accessing voice commands for all of the other car systems. We would think Acura could engineer a single set of buttons to activate all voice command functions. People who complain about BMW's iDrive should give this system a try.

Beyond this profusion of buttons, we've always liked the voice command systems offered in Acuras and Hondas. It's fairly intuitive and does a great job of recognizing spoken words. When we said, "Show restaurants," the system added restaurant icons to a displayed map, and when we asked, "What time is it," it told us the current time. The phone system works well, too. We paired it with a Motorola V551 cell phone, and found it simple to make calls by pressing the voice command button (the top one on the steering wheel) and telling the system to dial a number. We didn't find any straightforward way to access our phone's address book or recent calls log, however.

As in other Acuras we've seen, the navigation system is top-notch. It's easy to enter destinations, and its points-of-interest database goes beyond restaurants, gas stations, and ATMs to include all sorts of retail stores. It's like having a yellow pages in the car. The navigation system also does a good job with route guidance, showing a split screen with a graphic to indicate upcoming turns. Best of all, the RDX has the same live traffic reporting found on the RL. The system shows icons for traffic incidents, such as construction or crashes, as well as traffic speed on freeways and major roadways. The traffic information is a service from XM satellite radio; owners will need to maintain a subscription which costs $12.95 a month, after a three-month free service period.



XM satellite radio is one of the many sources of music available to the RDX's ELS Surround Sound stereo system, along with MP3, WMA, RedBook CD, DVD audio, radio, and an auxiliary input. An iPod adaptor is also available as an option. As we pointed out earlier, the software interface isn't designed well, making it difficult to navigate MP3 and WMA CDs. We were also surprised to see that the system doesn't display ID3 tagging information, just file and folder names.

But the stereo does sound good--really, really good. The system uses a 6-channel, 410-watt amplifier, pumping music through 10 speakers, including one center fill and a subwoofer. The Surround effect works very well, making it hard to pinpoint a sound source. Highs are extraordinarily crisp, the mid-range is excellent, but lows get just a little muddy at high volumes. It's a rich and clear sound, making every instrument stand out in a track. With our most bass-heavy music, we found the subwoofer tame enough not to shake the car.



There are a few other tech touches, notably a GPS-linked climate control system. This system uses the location and heading of the car to determine whether the sun is blazing through one side or the other, and adjusts the climate control system appropriately. In practice, we never noticed it taking effect, but that might mean it works seamlessly, since we were never particularly uncomfortable in the car either.

Fast and sure-footed
Driving the RDX is fun--much more fun than we would expect from a pseudo-SUV. The fun comes from the car's responsiveness. It jumps forward with the throttle down, and Acura's Super Handling all-wheel-drive system makes it extremely maneuverable. The RDX's peppiness comes from its 240-horsepower, 2.3-liter, turbocharged 4-cylinder engine, a good amount of power for the size of this car. The engine is pretty advanced, with variable timing and valve lift, an intercooler, and a uniquely designed variable-flow turbocharger, which is supposed to reduce lag. In our driving, we didn't feel lag when accelerating from stop, but the car did show some turbo weirdness of slight power surges when we tried to hold a steady speed.

The engine's 260 pounds per foot of torque comes in at 4,500rpm, which helped the car keep strong acceleration up to freeway speeds when we held the throttle down. The 5-speed automatic works well, though a lot of the competition has gone to six gears. We found the Sport mode worked well for city and mountain driving, maintaining power for coming out of turns or cutting through traffic. We didn't get much use out of the paddle shifters behind the steering wheel, which control the transmission's manual gear selection. The paddles came in handy while going down a long, steep hill, but we didn't find them that great for sport driving.

Acura's Super Handling all-wheel-drive system inspires confidence while cornering. The system gives the car neutral handling, making it go where we pointed it. The system distributes power between the front and back axles, and between the left and right rear wheels. An informational real-time diagram on the instrument cluster shows the power distribution. It's kind of fascinating, but dangerous to look at when the car is put into maneuvers that make the all-wheel-drive system work.

The EPA rates the RDX at 19mpg in the city and 23mpg on the highway. In our mixed freeway and city driving we observed 16.4mpg, lower than the EPA tests but not unexpected due to the turbo. The California Air Resources Board rates emissions for the RDX at ULEV II, a good score.

The RDX protects its occupants with front and side air bags for both front seats, and curtain air bags along both sides of the cabin. It also has side-impact door beams. The car gets five stars in front and side-impact crash tests, and four stars for roll-over. Road holding is helped by the Super Handling all-wheel-drive system, along with 4-wheel anti-lock brakes with electronic brakeforce distribution. The RDX also includes a vehicle stability program.

Although it has a back-up camera, there are no distance or path indicators overlaid on the display. A tire pressure monitoring system is standard. Acura's warranty on the RDX is four years or 50,000 miles. In addition, Acura gives the powertrain a six year or 70,000-mile warranty.

Acura makes pricing on the RDX simple, selling it for a base price of $32,995, or, with the Technology package, $36,495. Our review car was the latter, with no other options. Notable tech options are Acura MusicLink ($189), an iPod adaptor, and an auto-dimming, rear-view mirror ($225).

We like the 2007 Acura RDX for its sporty, quick handling and its excellent stereo. All of its other tech toys are fun, and few other cars have live traffic integrated with navigation control. We can learn to live with its mixed-up interface. Its price is pretty reasonable considering all it has to offer. It would be a hard choice between the Mazda CX-7 and the Acura RDX, but the RDX has superior features that would make us lean toward it.




* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
NYCshopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2006, 05:25 PM   #2
NYCshopper
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 5126
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: www.nugateway.com
Default



















NYCshopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2006, 06:11 PM   #3
nick9871
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 62428
Join Date: May 2004
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Seattle, WA
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Wagon
SRP stage deuce

Default

Man that is one ugly car!

Nice interior though. I love the new Acura dash style looks very sleek and not as boring as BMW.
nick9871 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2006, 07:15 PM   #4
Ghosthound
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 110979
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Vehicle:
2010 FJ Cruiser
1999 Miata

Default

they had one parked outside a costco once for there members car buying program so i swung by a checked it out. the front end hangs over funny, you cant tell from the pictures but in person it just looks weird. also, the back end reminds me of the tribeca
Ghosthound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2006, 07:36 PM   #5
Mrsir
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 12720
Join Date: Nov 2001
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: Not Maine anymore!
Vehicle:
2008 Porsche
Cayman S - Red

Default

Roommate got one of these as a loaner while his car was being worked on for a few days. We drove it a couple hundred miles, it was "ok", but seemed like a pointless vehicle really.

It had VERY limited storage room for an SVU and got horrible gas mileage. Seemed to drive well, but given the limited storage capacity I'd think someone would just be better off with a sedan.
Mrsir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2006, 08:05 PM   #6
phoenix96
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 14148
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Vehicle:
2006 Legacy GT Ltd
2011 Outback 3.6R Ltd

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCshopper View Post
I absolutely hate that praying mantis steering wheel design. Why has it become so popular now?



phoenix96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2006, 03:42 AM   #7
NismoSkylineGTR
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 94622
Join Date: Aug 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nick9871 View Post
Man that is one ugly car!

Nice interior though. I love the new Acura dash style looks very sleek and not as boring as BMW.
i wonder what kinda girl you like
cuz if you think that car is ugly
i do not know what is pretty in yoru eye
NismoSkylineGTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2006, 03:56 AM   #8
b4437
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 23162
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: sandiego,ca/columbus,ohio
Vehicle:
2006 300c,forester x
silver steel

Default

it looks like the rav4!1
b4437 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2006, 12:37 PM   #9
Lantec
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 48685
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.
Vehicle:
2010 Prius
Silver

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NismoSkylineGTR View Post
i wonder what kinda girl you like
cuz if you think that car is ugly
i do not know what is pretty in yoru eye
That car IS ugly. It's far too busy with its numerous lines and creases along the side of the body. The front with its multiple grills and upward slanting nose resembles the face of a bloated toad with a hint of Jabba the Hut. The rear like someone already said looks like a Tribeca and with its gaudy small lights and large panes of empty space, it just looks like they ran out of ideas and decided to plaster the area with more creases to make it look unique.

At least from my point of view, it's absolutely atrocious. They're trying way too hard to make the car look like something from Chris Bangle's drawing board and they've over-done it far too much.
Lantec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2006, 01:03 PM   #10
SoDealer
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 67960
Join Date: Aug 2004
Default

This car is uglier than any chris bangle design. Its design is not cohesive at all. Way too many concave and convex shapes all over it. It's kind of like the Infiniti FX in that it has such limited cargo room. Kind of like what's the point unless you just like to sit high. Unlike the RDX though... the Infiniti looks good.
SoDealer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2006, 02:42 PM   #11
gargleblaster
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 11107
Join Date: Oct 2001
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Rky Mtn High
Vehicle:
2015 WRX STi
Crystal White Pearl

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NismoSkylineGTR View Post
i wonder what kinda girl you like
cuz if you think that car is ugly
i do not know what is pretty in yoru eye
That car/SUV/whatever is ugly.
gargleblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 07:37 AM   #12
Spenk
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 7164
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona Bay
Vehicle:
2000 Miata LS
Evo Orange Mica (1/644)

Default

^^^^^+1

Pointless and fugly vehicle.
Spenk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 03:09 PM   #13
only1agam
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 56183
Join Date: Feb 2004
Chapter/Region: South East
Default

yea on the exterior is def not pretty... funy if you look at the back of that thing anyone else think tribeca? beautiful interior though nonetheless..
only1agam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 05:04 PM   #14
Hazdaz
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 14611
Join Date: Jan 2002
Default

Like most Acuras I wouldn't quite call it ugly, but definitely not great looking. Well except for the inside - the interior looks quite cool, but I find it funny how the interior is considered small.

Acura would have better served it's customers by coming out with a wagon version of the Accord, but then again, they wouldn't have been able to charge around $10k premium, since Americans equate "big" with "better".

RDX Interior:
Front Head Room: 38.7 in.
Front Hip Room: 54.4 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 58.2 in.
Rear Head Room: 38.3 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 56.3 in.
Rear Hip Room: 53 in.
Front Leg Room: 41.8 in.
Rear Leg Room: 37.7 in.
Luggage Capacity: 27.8 cu. ft.
Maximum Cargo Capacity: 61 cu. ft.
Maximum Seating: 5

Accord Interior:

Front Head Room: 38.3 in.
Front Hip Room: 54.6 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 56.9 in.
Rear Head Room: 36.8 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 56.1 in.
Rear Hip Room: 53.5 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.6 in.
Rear Leg Room: 36.8 in.
Luggage Capacity: 14 cu. ft.
Maximum Seating: 5

(in most dimensions, the Accord is within a fraction of an inch of the RDX in interior room)
Hazdaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 06:01 PM   #15
jaobrien6
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 49857
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazdaz View Post
(in most dimensions, the Accord is within a fraction of an inch of the RDX in interior room)
The one thing to note, though, is that you get an interior that has passenger volume about equal to the accord, and better luggage capacity (almost double according to the numbers you posted), and you get than in a vehicle that's 10.4" shorter (180.7 vs. 191.1 according to acura.com and honda.com). An accord wagon would probably have more cargo space than the RDX, but it would be noticeably longer. That compactness is worth something to some people.
jaobrien6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 06:09 PM   #16
happasaiyan
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 37731
Join Date: Jun 2003
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Rolling Meadows, IL
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaobrien6 View Post
The one thing to note, though, is that you get an interior that has passenger volume about equal to the accord, and better luggage capacity (almost double according to the numbers you posted), and you get than in a vehicle that's 10.4" shorter (180.7 vs. 191.1 according to acura.com and honda.com). An accord wagon would probably have more cargo space than the RDX, but it would be noticeably longer. That compactness is worth something to some people.
yup. the TL is about the same size on the inside, but is MUCH longer than the RDX. plus you cant as easily haul stuff in the TL.

the RDX is a very appealing car to me because it matches a few different requirements all at once.
happasaiyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 06:24 PM   #17
Hazdaz
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 14611
Join Date: Jan 2002
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaobrien6 View Post
The one thing to note, though, is that you get an interior that has passenger volume about equal to the accord, and better luggage capacity (almost double according to the numbers you posted), and you get than in a vehicle that's 10.4" shorter (180.7 vs. 191.1 according to acura.com and honda.com). An accord wagon would probably have more cargo space than the RDX, but it would be noticeably longer. That compactness is worth something to some people.
But it is probably well over 10" taller, as well as heavier, thirstier and more expensive. The Accord is far from a big car, so I personally don't see the problem.

:shrug:
(I just find most of these crossovers to be quite comical in their marketing aim compared to what they really are - the new millenium's Vista Cruiser at a premium price)
Hazdaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 07:07 PM   #18
bitterWRX
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 49624
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: CA
Vehicle:
04 AW WRX
13 SWP STi

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantec View Post
That car IS ugly. It's far too busy with its numerous lines and creases along the side of the body. The front with its multiple grills and upward slanting nose resembles the face of a bloated toad with a hint of Jabba the Hut. The rear like someone already said looks like a Tribeca and with its gaudy small lights and large panes of empty space, it just looks like they ran out of ideas and decided to plaster the area with more creases to make it look unique.

At least from my point of view, it's absolutely atrocious. They're trying way too hard to make the car look like something from Chris Bangle's drawing board and they've over-done it far too much.
I agree. It's extremely unpleasing to the eye. Similar to the X3, both cars have way too many lines that don't match up, everything is so cluttered and busy that it makes me wish the car would probably look better in spyshot mode with the black plastic wrap.
bitterWRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 07:49 PM   #19
jaobrien6
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 49857
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazdaz View Post
But it is probably well over 10" taller, as well as heavier, thirstier and more expensive. The Accord is far from a big car, so I personally don't see the problem.
It's only 8" taller, which is significant, but not as much as you would have thought... and I agree with the other three points (heavy, thirsty, expensive). However, getting AWD and more cargo space in a shorter (length) car is attractive to me. I get the space and AWD to go up to the mountains to go skiing, and it's easier to park on the street when I'm in town. Not saying I'm going to buy one, but I can definitely see some of the benefits of this vehicle, that's all.

If I compare and RDX to an Outback, the RDX is only about 4" taller (not sure, the outback includes crossbars, and I don't know how much height that adds), about 300 lbs. heavier (w/Auto), gets almost as good mileage (19/24 vs. 20/26), costs only $1400 more (no Nav in outback, and non-tech in RDX)... the Outback has more cargo capacity, but the RDX is 8" shorter. I actually don't think it's a bad package, personally...
jaobrien6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
acura rdx...now with more TURBO! happasaiyan Off-Topic 63 12-10-2012 01:22 PM
Legacy 3.0R Review by...CNET. WTF? ZenerDiode News & Rumors 1 01-28-2008 10:21 PM
"Mighty Zen" - 2007 Infiniti G35 Review by LA Times NYCshopper Non-Subaru News & Rumors 10 11-02-2006 05:48 AM
2007 Acura RDX vs. 2007 Mazda CX-7 GT vs. 2006 Toyota RAV4 Limited V6 (MotorTrend) NYCshopper Non-Subaru News & Rumors 5 10-25-2006 03:25 PM
2007 Acura RDX ShadowsBeSideMeWRX Off-Topic 22 09-22-2006 12:32 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.