03 wrx Stage 2 204whp

Mayor McCheese · 08-18-2007, 06:03 PM

Just got back from KITO.
03 wrx
Helix up
Invidia down
Cobb cat back
Open sourced tuning by Master2192 (Base MAP)

Mustang DYNO

WHP 204 @ 6400
TQ 193 @ 3800
AFR 11.6 min 12.9max 12.2 AVG (tailpipe not Wideband)
MAX boost 16.5

* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.

Vahnatai · 08-18-2007, 06:12 PM

What do stock WRXs dyno there?

mpggomd · 08-18-2007, 06:13 PM

Sounds a bit low...I'd love to see your map...

Hows the car feel?

Mayor McCheese · 08-18-2007, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vahnatai

What do stock WRXs dyno there?

I dont know.
Another guy with a similar setup put down 213whp.

Mayor McCheese · 08-18-2007, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpggomd

Sounds a bit low...I'd love to see your map...

Hows the car feel?

There is a slight bit of hesitation throughout the RPM range. Not enough to show lower numbers I don't think, but the tuner and I are working on it and it was there when I was running a AP so it is not MAP related.

Showing the map might not be possible, as its not "mine".

Also this is just a Stage 2 Base map, needs to be worked over. This is just a base dyno run so we have something to compare it to.

Vahnatai · 08-18-2007, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rexor

I dont know.
Another guy with a similar setup put down 213whp.

Reason I asked, was those are REALLY low numbers. I put down 40 more whp than you at stage 2 on an average reading dyno.

Mayor McCheese · 08-18-2007, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vahnatai

Reason I asked, was those are REALLY low numbers. I put down 40 more whp than you at stage 2 on an average reading dyno.

Yeah I was looking for 230whp based off of what my tuner said.

TeamTHP · 08-18-2007, 06:40 PM

Sean (master) Tuned mine too. I am happy with it.

Master2192 · 08-18-2007, 10:22 PM

Its ok, you can post the map if you want. It is freely available on enginuity.org

From looking at the AFRs he reported it is running leaner now than when I put the basemap on there. I need to head out there and log his car, but when we flashed it the logs show perfect timing and MAF flow numbers about equal to the car the basemap was developed on.

Map is available here.
http://www.enginuity.org/viewtopic.p...566&highlight=

Mayor McCheese · 08-18-2007, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master2192

Its ok, you can post the map if you want. It is freely available on enginuity.org

From looking at the AFRs he reported it is running leaner now than when I put the basemap on there. I need to head out there and log his car, but when we flashed it the logs show perfect timing and MAF flow numbers about equal to the car the basemap was developed on.

Map is available here.
http://www.enginuity.org/viewtopic.p...566&highlight=

Thanks Sean, I wasn't going to put it out there without your say so.I am not going to trust the tailpipe 02 sensor they used as 100% accurate, the .9 the AFR is off could be from it reading the air coming into the pipe but I will check for intake leaks as too. I PM'd you.

REX8 · 08-18-2007, 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vahnatai

Reason I asked, was those are REALLY low numbers. I put down 40 more whp than you at stage 2 on an average reading dyno.

244 on a base map stage II is NOT average in any way, shape, or form.

StarDogChampion · 08-19-2007, 12:36 AM

I put down 203awhp when I was stage 2 tuned by Dynocomp on a DynoDynamics dyno with Ecutek. Mine felt strong. Stock WRX's put out 160 or so there.

DrKicker · 08-19-2007, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REX8

244 on a base map stage II is NOT average in any way, shape, or form.

I put down 243.3hp and 240.0tq on a mustang dyno at only 14.5psi. This was at stage 2. Stock STI on the same dyno was 255 / 265 less than 10 minutes prior to my run. It was probably the same dyno as Vahnatai since I was in Dallas when it pulled those numbers.

Vahnatai · 08-19-2007, 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REX8

244 on a base map stage II is NOT average in any way, shape, or form.

Actually, 247 whp 245 ft lbs torque. It was on a correctly calibrated Mustang dyno. Though, it wasn't a base map. Stock STIs dyno'ed in the high 230s, at least from what I remember.

stevey323 · 08-19-2007, 01:40 PM

hmmm this does seem kinda low... I have a stage 2 4eat .. (uppipe, downpipe, headers, colder plugs, drop in K & N and a good tune) And i was able to pull on my friend who has an all motor 215whp civic (lighter than me also)....

Ricky87 · 08-19-2007, 03:48 PM

Yeah. I agree. I am at stg 2 as well and I was told by the previous owner that it made 230 whp. I have turboxs turbo back exhaust, intake, utech. And stock 02 are about 170.

Ricky87 · 08-19-2007, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevey323

hmmm this does seem kinda low... I have a stage 2 4eat .. (uppipe, downpipe, headers, colder plugs, drop in K & N and a good tune) And i was able to pull on my friend who has an all motor 215whp civic (lighter than me also)....

I have a friend that said with headers you get around 260whp.

Mayor McCheese · 08-19-2007, 10:37 PM

Added the dyno sheet

AWDWRXLOVER · 08-20-2007, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrKicker

I put down 243.3hp and 240.0tq on a mustang dyno at only 14.5psi. This was at stage 2. Stock STI on the same dyno was 255 / 265 less than 10 minutes prior to my run. It was probably the same dyno as Vahnatai since I was in Dallas when it pulled those numbers.

you texas guys love to spit out dyno numbers. you guys are all on 93 so its not the same. the difference between 91 and 93 is 15- 20 whp

hi sean

DrKicker · 08-20-2007, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AWDWRXLOVER

you texas guys love to spit out dyno numbers. you guys are all on 93 so its not the same. the difference between 91 and 93 is 15- 20 whp

hi sean

Just for you, same setup made 200hp / 210tq on a dyno dynamics dyno at Dynocomp in Phoenix on 91. Only mods difference between the two was Ecutek tuned in Phoenix and Unichip tuned in Dallas. The other 20hp was the altitude difference.

victor.q.tang · 08-20-2007, 02:21 AM

204 awhp seems just a tad bit lower than mine. i have catless downpipe, catback, k&n drop in filter, and an aps bov with the ecutek flash and dynotune @ dynocomp in phx. my car dyno'ed at 216hp with a little over 200 ft/tq. that 240 awhp sounds damn good!

SnoCoWRX · 08-20-2007, 08:39 AM

Just to put in my .02, my car put down exactly the same numbers on the same dyno the following day. I talked to Kito and Dominic who tunes for them and also tuned my car as well as some other guys and they said stock wrx's usually put down in the 160ish range on that dyno. I'm pretty happy with it for a road tune without and WB02. I'm still running a catted downpipe as well. I'll try to post up my graph later.

RuhRoh SVT · 08-20-2007, 09:59 AM

Yeah, im with everyone else on the numbers seeming low but it was also on a MustangDyno which typically reads lower then a DynoJet or DynaPack.

What kind of weather were you having when you dynoed the car? Temp makes a big difference, the roomates STi, made near 40 whp more when it was about 15 or so degrees cooler outside

ruiner · 08-20-2007, 11:23 AM

Another Texas guy here about to spew some dyno numbers. I have a TurboXS uppipe, and full catback with 1 racing cat in the midpipe. K&N airfilter and unichip and made 228/231 on a Mustang dyno. If the difference is 15-20 hp/tq for 93 octane then let's meet in the middle and say 17. So you should be around 211/214 hp/tq. This was running around 15 psi with no other mods. It does sound a bit low, but all cars put out slightly different numbers. Just for refence I gained 61 hp over my stock (baseline). I went from 167 to 228 hp with full catback, uppipe, EM, and air filter. Look at your stock gains to really see how well you're doing, adjusting for percentages obviously. So I gained roughly 36.5% versus stock. Take your stock hp numbers and see what percentage you increased, and you should be within 5% of my gains or anyone else here with the same mods.

Chad

makeitlookeasy · 08-20-2007, 11:25 AM

I also got my car tested there this weekend. I have a 03 wrx opensource tuned, vf30, sti pinks, walbro fp, ssautochrome tmic and catless exhaust. At first I had cobb 2.5 map and now with the opensource tune I felt a pretty good increase in power. And I only managed to pull a 232 hp on that dyno. Back to the drawing board for more power

08-18-2007, 06:03 PM	#1
Mayor McCheese Scooby Specialist Member#: 117018 Join Date: Jun 2006 Chapter/Region: NWIC Location: Seattle Lake**ty Vehicle:** 79 Rexor on Dubs Paws McGillicutty	03 wrx Stage 2 204whp Just got back from KITO. 03 wrx Helix up Invidia down Cobb cat back Open sourced tuning by Master2192 (Base MAP) Mustang DYNO WHP 204 @ 6400 TQ 193 @ 3800 AFR 11.6 min 12.9max 12.2 AVG (tailpipe not Wideband) MAX boost 16.5 * Registered users of the site do not see these ads. Last edited by Mayor McCheese; 08-19-2007 at 10:38 PM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FS: (SoCal) 02-03 WRX Stage 2 Package (Downpipe+AP)	nofriends	Engine/Power/Exhaust	2	05-28-2010 09:23 PM
Smoking from exhaust my 03 wrx stage 2	xevets	Newbies & FAQs	4	11-24-2008 05:25 PM
03 wrx stage 2 unichip	SQ3.0dotJP	MAIC Private Classifieds	0	01-05-2007 05:43 PM
03 Cobb Stage 2 WRX 1/8 mile time	Erexxx	Proven Power Bragging	9	06-09-2006 06:08 PM
COBB Access Port w/part's for 02-03 WRX Stage 2.5	BLUE WRX	Private 'For Sale' Classifieds	7	06-16-2005 10:59 PM

08-18-2007, 06:12 PM	#2
Vahnatai * Banned * Member#: 25027 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Broadsword	What do stock WRXs dyno there?

08-18-2007, 06:13 PM	#3
mpggomd Scooby Specialist Member#: 74167 Join Date: Nov 2004 Chapter/Region: NESIC Location: Tewksbury Vehicle: 2011 WRX Sedan WRB Cobb Stage 2 OTS	Sounds a bit low...I'd love to see your map... Hows the car feel?

08-18-2007, 06:40 PM	#8
TeamTHP Scooby Newbie Member#: 151994 Join Date: Jun 2007 Chapter/Region: NWIC Location: Seattle, WA Vehicle: 05 STI "Stage 2" 13.10@103.6mph, 1.78 60's	Sean (master) Tuned mine too. I am happy with it.

08-18-2007, 10:22 PM	#9
Master2192 RIP 10/12/83 to 02/10/08 Scooby Specialist Member#: 83254 Join Date: Mar 2005 Chapter/Region: NWIC Location: Roy, Washington Vehicle: 98 2.5 RS 04 WRX	Its ok, you can post the map if you want. It is freely available on enginuity.org From looking at the AFRs he reported it is running leaner now than when I put the basemap on there. I need to head out there and log his car, but when we flashed it the logs show perfect timing and MAF flow numbers about equal to the car the basemap was developed on. Map is available here. http://www.enginuity.org/viewtopic.p...566&highlight=

08-19-2007, 12:36 AM	#12
StarDogChampion Scooby Specialist Member#: 10276 Join Date: Sep 2001 Vehicle: 2001 Impreza RS 2002 WRX, 2012 535i	I put down 203awhp when I was stage 2 tuned by Dynocomp on a DynoDynamics dyno with Ecutek. Mine felt strong. Stock WRX's put out 160 or so there.

08-19-2007, 01:40 PM	#15
stevey323 Scooby Specialist Member#: 130230 Join Date: Oct 2006 Chapter/Region: SCIC Location: L.A./CSUF Vehicle: 2002 WRX-totaled =[ 2011 G37-S	hmmm this does seem kinda low... I have a stage 2 4eat .. (uppipe, downpipe, headers, colder plugs, drop in K & N and a good tune) And i was able to pull on my friend who has an all motor 215whp civic (lighter than me also)....

08-19-2007, 03:48 PM	#16
Ricky87 Scooby Specialist Member#: 128549 Join Date: Oct 2006 Chapter/Region: MAIC Location: MD Vehicle: 2006 Benz	Yeah. I agree. I am at stg 2 as well and I was told by the previous owner that it made 230 whp. I have turboxs turbo back exhaust, intake, utech. And stock 02 are about 170.

08-19-2007, 10:37 PM	#18
Mayor McCheese Scooby Specialist Member#: 117018 Join Date: Jun 2006 Chapter/Region: NWIC Location: Seattle Lake**ty Vehicle:** 79 Rexor on Dubs Paws McGillicutty	Added the dyno sheet

08-20-2007, 02:21 AM	#21
victor.q.tang Scooby Newbie Member#: 113777 Join Date: Apr 2006 Chapter/Region: SWIC Location: chandler, az Vehicle: 2000 miata silver	204 awhp seems just a tad bit lower than mine. i have catless downpipe, catback, k&n drop in filter, and an aps bov with the ecutek flash and dynotune @ dynocomp in phx. my car dyno'ed at 216hp with a little over 200 ft/tq. that 240 awhp sounds damn good!

08-20-2007, 08:39 AM	#22
SnoCoWRX Scooby Specialist Member#: 126499 Join Date: Sep 2006 Chapter/Region: NWIC Location: Lake Stevens, WA Vehicle: 2004 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins Turbo Diesel	Just to put in my .02, my car put down exactly the same numbers on the same dyno the following day. I talked to Kito and Dominic who tunes for them and also tuned my car as well as some other guys and they said stock wrx's usually put down in the 160ish range on that dyno. I'm pretty happy with it for a road tune without and WB02. I'm still running a catted downpipe as well. I'll try to post up my graph later.

08-20-2007, 09:59 AM	#23
RuhRoh SVT Scooby Newbie Member#: 157119 Join Date: Aug 2007	Yeah, im with everyone else on the numbers seeming low but it was also on a MustangDyno which typically reads lower then a DynoJet or DynaPack. What kind of weather were you having when you dynoed the car? Temp makes a big difference, the roomates STi, made near 40 whp more when it was about 15 or so degrees cooler outside

08-20-2007, 11:23 AM	#24
ruiner Scooby Specialist Member#: 20784 Join Date: Jul 2002 Chapter/Region: TXIC Location: Dallas, TX Vehicle: 2002 Impreza WRX WR Blue	Another Texas guy here about to spew some dyno numbers. I have a TurboXS uppipe, and full catback with 1 racing cat in the midpipe. K&N airfilter and unichip and made 228/231 on a Mustang dyno. If the difference is 15-20 hp/tq for 93 octane then let's meet in the middle and say 17. So you should be around 211/214 hp/tq. This was running around 15 psi with no other mods. It does sound a bit low, but all cars put out slightly different numbers. Just for refence I gained 61 hp over my stock (baseline). I went from 167 to 228 hp with full catback, uppipe, EM, and air filter. Look at your stock gains to really see how well you're doing, adjusting for percentages obviously. So I gained roughly 36.5% versus stock. Take your stock hp numbers and see what percentage you increased, and you should be within 5% of my gains or anyone else here with the same mods. Chad

08-20-2007, 11:25 AM	#25
makeitlookeasy Scooby Newbie Member#: 78018 Join Date: Dec 2004 Chapter/Region: NWIC Location: Gig Harbor Vehicle: 2003 WRX Green PPG Aspen White	I also got my car tested there this weekend. I have a 03 wrx opensource tuned, vf30, sti pinks, walbro fp, ssautochrome tmic and catless exhaust. At first I had cobb 2.5 map and now with the opensource tune I felt a pretty good increase in power. And I only managed to pull a 232 hp on that dyno. Back to the drawing board for more power