|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|||||||




![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4355
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: phoenix az usa
|
Heres my setup 2.0 unichip,m2 uppipe, turboxs downpipe with
3in pipe the rest of exhaust no cats, injen intake, m2 intercooler+ bigger hoses, boost gauge,egt, knocklink. oh 5 speed, stock turbo. First Q is i've dragged my car on two seperate occasions most runs are about 14.0 at 97or98mph, my best is 13.7 at 98mph. most of the time i run the boost at 1.2 bar max in like 3rd gear and somewhere between 3000 to 5500 at 1.2 bar then bleeds off to redline. But recently i turned the boost down to what turboxs says to run at 16.5 psi and my car feels faster but i have not tried this setting at the drag strip. but why is it like this? more boost= more hps right? Second Q for my car if its above 60 degrees my car feels faster, is this because when this program was made it was programed at whatever temp it was outside? or does our car pull timing the colder it gets? Or cause my m2 intercooler is making too cool of intake charge? Also i'm not the best shifter but my 60fts are always 1.8 and have 1/2 tank of gas with 2 gals of 108 octane in the mix, and stock tires. But still my times should be in the lower 13s right? i don't power shift like not using the clutch!! If anyone has any advice i would be much apprecitated. THANKS
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4355
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: phoenix az usa
|
bump for me. anybody got any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 9832
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ashburn, VA
Vehicle:2004 STI Aspen White |
More boost = more power
This is wrong. You have to optimize your motor to be able to run more boost. When Mark dynoed my car we found that the highest gains were made with under 16psi of boost. There are alot of factors that you need to consider. Such as A/F ratios and timming. Unless your chip is tuned for 18psi running the higher boost could cause some serious problems. I would bet money that you were getting detonation running that higher boost without A/F correction. Try turning your boost down to around 1.15 bar and try racing again. Or even better find someone who has a G-Tech and try various boost settings and see where the most gains are made. I would put money down that you will see the best performance around 16psi or a little less. Mor boost + corrected A/F + corrected timming = more power |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 14029
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
|
On some stock engines (not sure about subs) more boost could produce knock, which the ECU might retard the timing = less power.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 10108
Join Date: Sep 2001
Chapter/Region:
TXIC
Location: LCP / N Austin TX
Vehicle:07 STI 25G build in progress |
The sweet spot on the REX seems to be around 15.5 PSI. That's what unichip owners as well as MBC'ed owners on the stock turbo are finding out. Keep it under 16. With a 1.8 60 ft you should pull mid 13's at least. I consistently pull 13.8 with just an MBC. BTW, I set my boost at around 15.5-16 PSI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 9832
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ashburn, VA
Vehicle:2004 STI Aspen White |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 12828
Join Date: Nov 2001
Vehicle:2002 WRX WRC Blue Pearl |
Hey guys,
The "sweet spot" you are referring to is the turbo's efficiency range. Since the turbo is relatively small, it has good spool up characteristics (without the 1,000 cats) but tends to wheeze a bit up top. Consequently, turning up the boost past say 16 psi will start pushing it out of its efficiency range, meaning it has to work harder to produce the boost you want. Working harder=more heat, so you get to a point where the boost that the turbo produces is not as useful as it would be with a larger turbo. Generally speaking, the more charged air you can get into the engine at the coldest temp (more dense), the more powerful the explosion in the cylinder= more power. So for the most part, more 20 psi on an efficient turbo creates more power than the stock turbo on 16 psi. I know, this is the simple expanation, of course things like timing/fuel come into play. Stefan Mach V (soon to be FastWRX.com) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4355
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: phoenix az usa
|
I'm not getting knock according to my knocklink, but i can feel
like its just not pulling above 6000 rpm. it was odd when i got my fastest time was when my engine was heat soaked pretty good. I always add 108 octane to my 91 octane gas here, also the chip is tuned for 91 octane. Any ideas about temps and my m2 intercooler maybe to cold outside? does it matter if say you have a huge intercooler and use the turbo out of its efficency range would you still make less hp? thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4355
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: phoenix az usa
|
Anyone else got an ideas? bump
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 8785
Join Date: Jul 2001
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Vehicle:02 c_turner@ix. netcom.com |
Quote:
On my car if I go to 15 psi I get about 17 degree's of advance in the midrange. If go to 17 psi I get about 10 degree's.. This is why people find that running 15 psi is the hot ticket. If you turn up the boost past that you will feel more trq but the reduced timing really kills the top end off. I used to think the lack of timing was due to some knock. This can be true and some of it might be..But now my research shows me that when the MAP sensor reads much over 200kpa timing is reduced and fuel is dumped. I dont have a unichip so my tests are going to be different. If my hunch is correct I could do a nasty trick and use a Zener diode to clamp the map sensor to 200kpa, but I am using Stand alone very soon so why bother.... Besides you have the unichip so you dont have to do nasty tricks like that ![]() If you want to take the time to read your advance and adjust your boost with my scanner you can. You car is not that far off as 98mph is not to shabby. I also use the Gtechs G meter. Its crude but effective in showing me forward G's. If I do the exact same run on the same road I can see differences in G's depending on my boost level. I dont use the Hp portion of the Gtech.. Just the G meter itself. Mainly I tune my boost level to the point where my advance level is not degraded. This has always gave me the most power. Dont forget to reset the ECU when you change your boost levels and remember... After a reset you will need to drive the car a bit and do some WOT runs before your race. I have noticed my car runs lean and slower if I reset the ECU and make a pass.. After a few miles and some WOT pulls the power comes back. You may have to leave the strip and run up and down the highway for a bit and then come right back... I am going to Speedworld on Wednesday if you want to go. CT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 4355
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: phoenix az usa
|
Azscoobie your the *****. should have just asked you . i going to
buy a palm but what program are you running for it? p.m. me and give me your phone # i'll call you. i think its going to rain on weds if it does i won't go of course. if it does rain it will be a miracle i still have not drove my in the rain HAHAHA . i've had it since july HAHAHA later chad |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 8785
Join Date: Jul 2001
Chapter/Region:
SWIC
Vehicle:02 c_turner@ix. netcom.com |
Quote:
![]() I will PM ya my # CT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 4667
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Asheville, NC
Vehicle:2002 WRX Black (well kinda) |
Why is he only running 14s with those mods?
Of course I have thought of driver error. Technically though, why are they so high? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 6376
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Upland,Ca,Usa
|
hey there buddy.... you mentioned something about a cable .... is this the cable to read stuff from your ecu.... where can i get one ... i need a laptop right.... tell me what this software does what can i modify...??? pleae get back to me marioaias@aol.com thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1.0,1.5 or 2.0 Rear LSD | X-Rex | Motorsports | 14 | 04-12-2007 05:24 PM |
| what has more top end, pe1820,or 1825? | kenlee | Factory 2.5L Turbo Powertrain | 15 | 06-09-2004 12:34 AM |
| What has more NA power? the 2.0 or the 2.5? | STiWRXdotcom | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 34 | 06-08-2002 12:17 PM |
| S-AFC vs. Chip which has more hp gains? | Cusco | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 0 | 01-30-2002 07:38 AM |
| 16, 17 or 18 inch Tires for the WRX? | Chuck Annicelli | Brakes, Steering & Suspension | 5 | 03-24-2001 08:38 AM |