Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Thursday November 20, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC Technical > Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo)

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2002, 03:08 PM   #1
STI RDY
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 5738
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
Sedona Red Pearl

Default Merit (performance-wise) of catback exhaust

I am thinking about getting a catback exhaust system. But I am still a bit confused on the performance merit of such a system.

Do you get the catback mainly just for looks and sound?

What kind of performance improvement would you see? I looked at some dyno numbers for the Scoobysport catback and results seem to be mixed (mostly no performance gains at all). And I also heard that with a freer-flowing catback, the low-end torque might be compromised due to less backpressure.

I know this topic has probably been beaten to death by you experts out there...and there seemed to be a lot of conflicting opinions when a search is performed (at least when I did a search). And my browser is unable to view the exhaust website hosted by atf78.

If there is indeed performance advantage to installing a catback, it would be great if someone can come up with a performance/loudness ratio comparison chart for the different catback systems.

TIA...
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
STI RDY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2002, 06:50 PM   #2
Concillian
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 4414
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dublin, CA
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
Midnight Black

Default

shiv was cool enough to show us this dyno plot comparing his Stage 0 configuration, and what happened when he threw on a catback (SPT optional muffler)



The highest HP run is with the muffler

You can see that the range in which the catback showed improvement is from about 4500 to 6500, and it's not a huge increase, but a reasonable increase. This is already with all the improvements of Stage 0, so I'd guess that the effect is larger than it would be with the stock exhaust tract.

I'd expect it would have a bigger improvement if a less restrictive downpipe were used. However, in all cases I'd expect gains primarily in the higher RPM range...4000 - 4500 RPM and up. No real gains in the lower half of the RPM range.
Concillian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2002, 06:54 PM   #3
sohcv8gt
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 14475
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Vehicle:
02 WRX
Silver

Default

Hey,

Really... there is not much merit too it... there are very minimal horsepower gains to be had..depending on the catback system you install... you can expect 4 to 6hp in gains from a good hi-flow system. This is hardly worth your hard earned $$$ on a WRX considering the 400 to 600$ costs of a cat-back. Mark from TurboXS was honest with me on the phone when I ordered the Unichip/boost controller/drop in K&N and told me that the cat-back was only worth 5-6hp over the stock kit with their Stage 1 kit.

Do yourself a favor, and get a unichip and boost controller setup...without the cat-back exhaust. You will get 4-5 times the horsepower gains offered over just the catback for 750-800$.

Shiv from Vishnu also offers a similar setup but had no "plug and play" harness like TurboXS to make things sweet and simple.

I have been running the TurboXS stage 1 unichip and boost controller for over 6 months and love it... great power gains, easy mod to install.... well worth my $$$.

Some guys would just tell you to install a 45-50$ boost guage and 50-100$ manual boost controller for similar gains... I myself like the added security of the Unichip that adds the necessary A/F ratio and Timing curve changes for added boost.

UP to you... Good luck!

SOHC
02 Subaru WRX... TurboXS Unichip
99 Vortech Mustang GT.... way too many mods to list...
sohcv8gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2002, 08:16 PM   #4
Vishnu Performance
Vendor
 
Member#: 14494
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Vehicle:
WRX Porsche 996
blue & black

Default

The SPT rear muffler section was worth, on average, an additional 8 wheel hp over Stage Zero with no additional Unichip mapping. Torque was higher across the board too. Those are pretty significant gains for just a muffler section. I suspect there's another few hp if I had retuned the Unichip and replaced that skinny stock intermediate exhaust pipe with a larger-diameter unit. But even if one just replaced the muffler section, he'd see some good bang for the buck ($300-odd for another 8 wheel hp). Of course, these predicted gains are for a car that is already flowing more air than stock.

Cheers.
shiv
Vishnu Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2002, 01:06 AM   #5
Ken C
Vendor
 
Member#: 6605
Join Date: May 2001
Location: PA, USA
Default Cat backs

To echo some comments here:

A good cat-back will add hp to the high end of the car, as seen in the plots. The ScoobySport has done anywhere between 9 and 14 hp in dyno runs that we have seen, but mainly to the top end of course. The real increase in driveability and low end torque comes in through other methods like deleting cats and using a good downpipe, as with our full exhaust, or by taking an careful approach like Shiv has done with his stage O.

You really can't just gloss over the cat back saying that it doesnt help, as it is part of an equation (increase low and midrange torque, increase high end hp, etc)

To say it again:
We don't recommend increasing boost without good engine management coupled with it, by the way, and I think others here would agree.

Regards,
Ken
Rally Performance
ScoobySport N.A.
Ken C is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Ark Performance 3 inch Catback Exhaust StuSSYsporT Engine/Power/Exhaust 52 08-11-2010 04:25 PM
FS: Ark Performance 3 inch Catback Exhaust StuSSYsporT SCIC Private Classifieds 85 08-10-2010 02:03 PM
Good Sounding/Performing Stock Looking Catback Exhaust Swift2 Newbies & FAQs 19 09-03-2008 09:17 PM
Imprezion of catback exhaust & question old dude Factory 2.0L Turbo Powertrain (EJ Series Factory 2.0L Turbo) 7 11-04-2002 01:22 AM
Point of Catback exhaust dman918 General Community 4 11-22-2001 03:21 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.