Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Monday September 15, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > News & Rumors > Non-Subaru News & Rumors

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-31-2008, 10:58 AM   #1
AVANTI R5
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 73805
Join Date: Nov 2004
Default Save the Earth: Drive a Ferrari




Quote:
Amid the huffing and puffing on Capitol Hill and elsewhere about jacking corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) for new vehicles to 35 mpg by 2020 (or up to 50 mpg if you happen to live in California) while reducing tailpipe emissions to the level of an ant fart, it seems the world has overlooked this surprising statistic: Toyota Priuses are 78 times more toxic to the environment than Ferraris.



Furthermore, they consume 78 times the amount of gasoline.


The Math

That’s right. While we’re sure to be called out on this by our more persnickety readers, the math breaks down thus:
Since the beginning of the 2004 model year, when the current Prius debuted, Ferrari has sold roughly 7900 cars in North America. Annual mileage for the average Ferrari is tough to estimate, as some are destined to remain zero-mile collectors’ items while others are daily drivers, but according to a Ferrari spokesman, Ferraris sold in North America get driven “right around 5000 miles per year for V-12 models, less with the V-8s.” Assuming, then, that the average Ferrari is driven 4500 miles per year, the total fleet mileage for this fresh herd of prancing horses is 35,550,000 miles per year (all too few of them with our hands on the reigns).



The average Ferrari CO2 emissions level hovers somewhere near 400 g/km, or 644 g/mile, according to Ferrari. Over the 35 million or so miles that the fleet of North American Ferraris will travel in the next year, they will be responsible for approximately 23 million kg of CO2. Fuel consumption, at an average of about 14 mpg combined for the Ferrari fleet, will be somewhere in the neighborhood of 2.5 million gallons of gas. Sound like a lot?



Look at how the Prius is pillaging Mother Earth. Since the 2004 model year, when Toyota introduced the current-generation Prius (and through November 2008), Toyota delivered 609,625 units. Toyota claims the average Prius is driven 15,000 miles per year, for a total fleet mileage of 9,144,375,000 miles annually.



According to Toyota, the Prius coughs up a comparatively dainty 118 g/km, or 190 g/mile, of CO2, but with all those rolling doorstops on the road, that results in an atmosphere-choking 1.7 billion kg per annum, or roughly 78 times as much as the Ferrari set. And all the gas consumed over those nine billionor so miles, even at a combined 46 miles per gallon, still robs the earth of about 200 million gallons of gas, also 78 times as much as is consumed by Ferraris. Pigs.



Toyota, for its part, was glib when confronted with the facts. A Toyota spokesman, who declined to be named, said, “Ferraris are green? I thought they were all red.”



Just Kidding, Sort Of

Okay, we’re totally not serious. Suggesting that, between a Ferrari and a Prius, the premium-swilling prancing horse would be the most environmentally responsible option would be journalistically irresponsible, despite the 1.7 billion kilograms of CO2 that today’s Priuses will pump into the atmosphere over the next year, the 200 million gallons of gas they will consume, and the innumerable quantities of raw materials required to build them and their bespoke metal-heavy hybrid battery packs.



Believe it or not, the Prius hardly makes a dent in the environmental picture while meeting the needs of far more commuters at far less expense to them as well as the earth on a per-mile basis than a Ferrari. Indeed, if every Prius driver switched into a Ferrari and drove it 15,000 miles per year, the overall picture would be far less green—but a lot more red.



We appreciate Toyota’s clear commitment to making the Prius the incredibly green vehicle it is, to say nothing of how much greener the all-new 2010 Prius will be when it launches next month at the NAIAS. But to us, these facts underscore that it’s not the cars themselves that are doing the damage, but the drivers. If we all drove less, it might matter less what we drive than how and how often. If we were all really smart about when we drove, we could save the world by driving Ferraris.



Hey, Environmentalists: Instead of Legislating the Prancing Horse into Extinction, Try Walking

We hope this fact is not lost on our lawmakers as they further their green-car agendas, the results of which could result in a de facto ban of exotics and super-luxury cars in many states, or at least exorbitant fines being slapped on them. Certainly, buyers of these cars are accustomed to exorbitant fines (six-to-seven-figure MSRPs and gas-guzzler taxes) already. But the added cost may be just enough of a deterrent to keep some customers away—particularly with the economy in the shape it’s in—and that could prompt Ferrari, Lamborghini, and other high-end makes out of the U.S. altogether.



If there’s one caveat, it’s that these states are not alone: European Union lawmakers recently approved an aggressive plan of their own to reduce CO2 emissions, and high-end carmakers are already bracing to deal with that. In any case, we hope that the folks in Washington D.C., Sacramento, and the EU keep things in perspective as they enact legislation that could quite possibly erase the most colorful and beautiful cars in the world from the automotive landscape.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...errari_feature
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
AVANTI R5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 01:04 PM   #2
Skunkers
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 115480
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St. Pete, FL
Vehicle:
2002 RSX-S
Desert Silver

Default

Except that I'm a retard when it comes to mathematics, but even I can tell you how ridiculously effing stupid that is. Yeah, the average Ferrari only gets driven ~5000 miles per year. However, the owner of that car still needs to travel, and does it in other cars (likely in high-end luxury cars or limos) still driving around putting out more C02 than a Prius. All he does by stepping into his Ferrari is temporarily crank up the amount of emissions he puts out on average, and his median emissions output is certainly much, much, much worse than someone driving around all year in a Camry, let alone a Prius. Hell, someone DDing a Corvette all year probably has a lower annual emissions output. GTFO with that crap.

WTF
Skunkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 01:07 PM   #3
Mechie3
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 120152
Join Date: Jul 2006
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: Indy
Default

^^ Did you read the second half of the article at all? They admit that on a per mile basis it's not better. The article is actually aimed at legislators trying to implicitly ban exotics by adding taxes to ownership by saying that even though they're polluters, they aren't used all that much.
Mechie3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 01:16 PM   #4
Skunkers
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 115480
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St. Pete, FL
Vehicle:
2002 RSX-S
Desert Silver

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechie3 View Post
^^ Did you read the second half of the article at all? They admit that on a per mile basis it's not better. The article is actually aimed at legislators trying to implicitly ban exotics by adding taxes to ownership by saying that even though they're polluters, they aren't used all that much.
Yeah, I read it. Look, I'm not for legislating exotics out, but there's no arguing that it wouldn't help lower total emissions. What I said stands, total emission output comes from the owner, not the specific car. Hindering someone from owning a high-emissions output vehicle will help decrease emissions, even if they don't drive that specific car that much.

Like I said, I don't want them to legislate Ferraris out, I would vote against it. But there's absolutely no case for what the article is actually saying. It's a bold-faced lie.
Skunkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 02:14 PM   #5
JuggernautTCW
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 169223
Join Date: Jan 2008
Default

uhh how about the gvmt mandates that every vehicle comes with an emission-ometer and the car will not start once it goes past a point in a fixed period of time. if you want to drive more than thats too bad... u need to buy more cars.
JuggernautTCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 02:21 PM   #6
fourmicah
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 128760
Join Date: Oct 2006
Chapter/Region: RMIC
Location: Over there>
Vehicle:
2012 Ruckus/WRX
Red&White/Gray

Default

This reminds me of when I see people run to get the elevator, but they won't walk up the stairs. Don't they know that coal is burned to create the electricity to operate this stuff.
fourmicah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 07:46 PM   #7
Tim Quinn
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 16961
Join Date: Mar 2002
Chapter/Region: VIC
Location: Downtown Vancity
Vehicle:
2011 Kawi Ninja 400R
Kawasaki Green

Default

Grams per Mile has got to be one of the most confusing units of measurement that I have ever seen... Makes my brain hurt just thinking about it mixing metric and standard into a single measurement.

-Tim

P.S. "I am a Banana"
Tim Quinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2009, 10:58 AM   #8
SubaruImpreza_power
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 13910
Join Date: Jan 2002
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: Greenwich, CT
Vehicle:
1997 Legacy outback
blue

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fourmicah View Post
This reminds me of when I see people run to get the elevator, but they won't walk up the stairs. Don't they know that coal is burned to create the electricity to operate this stuff.
reminds me when I was at a hotel and the power went out and the fire alarm also came on which made the elavators go to the recall floor.. after the fire department gave the all clear everyone bolted for the elevator..

I took the stairs which was clear of the mobs of people
SubaruImpreza_power is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SAVE THE DATE! S.E. SoA Sponsored Driving Event RexyGirl South East Region Forum 142 10-02-2009 10:43 AM
Save the cheerleader, save the world. rallyblues Off-Topic 11 01-22-2007 06:52 PM
Save the cheerleader, save the world. rallyblues Political Playground 1 01-22-2007 05:46 PM
Got the good fortune to drive a Ferrari SuperAmerica Saturday Nawambo Mid Atlantic Impreza Club -- MAIC 13 03-14-2006 03:39 PM
Hottie drives the wheels off a Ferrari 360. Predwolf Off-Topic 36 07-28-2005 10:15 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.