Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Sunday July 13, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > News & Rumors > Non-Subaru News & Rumors

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-10-2009, 01:16 PM   #1
AVANTI R5
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 73805
Join Date: Nov 2004
Default "interbuildability/GM says itís ready to tackle small cars

Quote:
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- Desperate to eliminate red ink, General Motors thinks it has created a factory method to build small vehicles profitably in North America. GM calls the method "interbuildability."

The concept is better known among competitors simply as standardization, and GM is not the first to hit on the idea.
The automaker is standardizing its factories around the world, said Gary Cowger, GM's group vice president for global manufacturing and labor relations.

One key to the strategy: Different models on the same architecture will have "plug and play" component modules, such as exhaust systems and front-end modules.

That means a crossover in Europe and a sedan in China might share the same chassis, engine compartments and structural components but still look remarkably different to consumers.

Elusive profit

Cowger said a new group of mid-sized cars is the first to demonstrate the system. That group includes the 2009 Opel Insignia and a new Buick Regal that will begin production in the United States next year.

Cowger said the global mid-sized program resulted in a 29 percent savings on engineering costs.

"Our global mid-size vehicles are rolling out now," he said. "We're now applying it to small cars in several highly differentiated body styles."

Cowger described the global manufacturing strategy here last night at the Automotive News Manufacturing Conference.

He said that from the United States to China, new methods are being put in place to allow GM to spread vehicle development and production costs across multiple markets and products.

Cowger said the global factory makeover has been under way for four years and will be 82 percent complete by 2012.
GM's frustration at producing small cars and trucks profitably in North America goes back to the 1980s. Competitors such as Honda, Nissan and Toyota proved adroit at turning out Civics and Corollas and compact pickups from U.S. plants, while GM struggled to find an acceptable profit margin in the segments.

GM created its small-car Saturn brand in 1985 in part to prove that it could make small cars profitably to compete with the Japanese.

But Saturn was built in isolation, noted industry consultant Laurie Harbour-Felax, who has been watching GM's latest evolution.

"They built Saturn in one factory with no way to spread costs around," she said. "What they're talking about now is being able to spread their costs all around the world."

Saturn ultimately proved a dead end for GM. The automaker plans to sell the Saturn brand to industry mogul Roger Penske.

Fuel-efficiency implications

But a portfolio of new small GM models is now coming for markets around the world. This month the company revealed that it intends to put an unidentified small vehicle into an undetermined U.S. plant.

The push for factory and vehicle standardization also could help GM reach stiff new federal fuel-efficiency targets looming for 2016. To reach the new requirement of a 35.5-mpg fleet average, GM might have to introduce cars as small as the A segment into the United States, Cowger said.
A-segment vehicles -- also known as city cars -- are rarely seen in the United States. The segment consists of vehicles such as the Smart ForTwo
http://www.autonews.com/article/2009...906109971/1176
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
AVANTI R5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 02:47 PM   #2
SCRAPPYDO
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 873
Join Date: Feb 2000
Chapter/Region: TXIC
Location: Just outside of Houston TX
Vehicle:
2013 F150 King Ranch
Datsun 71 240Z & 68 2000

Default

Wow, welcome to 1993 General Motors...it does not matter what you do, your dead to me. Become a private company with a competitive product and we will talk.
SCRAPPYDO is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 03:17 PM   #3
Hazdaz
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 14611
Join Date: Jan 2002
Default

ummm... it's nice and all to see GM try to enter an important market segment, but geez guys, this is the type of stuff that other companies have been doing for decades now.

What the F took you so long?
Hazdaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 03:51 PM   #4
Yotsuya
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 935
Join Date: Feb 2000
Chapter/Region: MWSOC
Location: ಠ_ಠ
Vehicle:
Jack Soo Fan Club

Default

The product cycle of the Cavalier, probably.
Yotsuya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 05:27 PM   #5
matt30
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 97330
Join Date: Sep 2005
Chapter/Region: BAIC
Location: California/New York
Vehicle:
2003 WRX

Default

In all honesty it does take some of the ability of the designers to innovate in a way.

EV-1, Malibu, Cobalt SS, even the Volt were all products of the free rein given to designers.

In all fairness they've got it down for trucks, their biggest profit producer.
matt30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 05:33 PM   #6
Hondaslayer
Purified Dick
Moderator
 
Member#: 4562
Join Date: Feb 2001
Chapter/Region: NWIC
Location: Auburn, WA
Vehicle:
1995 Legacy LSi
1998 Forester, lifted.

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt30 View Post
In all honesty it does take some of the ability of the designers to innovate in a way.

EV-1, Malibu, Cobalt SS, even the Volt were all products of the free rein given to designers.

In all fairness they've got it down for trucks, their biggest profit producer.
Not really, all of those cars could have benefited from parts binning. All of them could share suspension mounting points etc.... but still have bespoke valving and spring rates.
Hondaslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM says it 'disappointed' consumers AVANTI R5 Non-Subaru News & Rumors 28 12-11-2008 10:06 PM
Mercury Lives! Brand to Sell Small Cars. Or Not AVANTI R5 Non-Subaru News & Rumors 11 07-23-2008 10:06 PM
PR: T-Stow/Bradley ready to tackle Rim of the World Rally mvb North West Impreza Club Forum -- NWIC 0 05-02-2002 10:22 AM
PR: T-Stow/Bradley ready to tackle Rim of the World Rally mvb Motorsports 0 05-02-2002 10:17 AM
Greg is ready to paint his car Greg555 Mid West Subaru Owners Club Forum -- MWSOC 3 06-28-2001 08:42 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.