Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Wednesday July 30, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC Technical > Engine Management & Tuning

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-10-2011, 06:49 PM   #76
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

try that and let me know. we will get you back up and running asap.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 07:23 PM   #77
Concillian
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 4414
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dublin, CA
Vehicle:
2002 WRX Sedan
Midnight Black

Default

Tried this out this week.
I'm using Romraider with a Zeitrinics ZT2 (logged via Romraider)

VDyno reconizes the ZT2 AFR column, but does not recognize the ZT2 MAP column.
These are the column headers:
Zeitronix ZT-2 MAP (Vacuum(inHg)/Boost(PSI))
Zeitronix ZT-2 Wideband AFR (AFR)
Concillian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 05:46 PM   #78
mudferret
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 240688
Join Date: Mar 2010
Chapter/Region: W. Canada
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Vehicle:
06 WRX

Default

Downloaded the new version recently to see what it looked like. Noticed something that wasn't evident (or as evident) in the last release I graphed with (1.0.7). Independant of the smoothing factor used the most recent version has a couple of steps in the whp line at 3200 and 3800 rpm. There's a subtle step at 3800 in the old version. Smoothing factor did not change the amplitude of the steps at all. Different type of smoothing?

Runs done at 3500', 15F, car + me + junk = 3388, blah blah

Old version


New version
mudferret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 09:54 PM   #79
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

the smoothing method has changed but it didnt affect the center of the run it just affects the end of the runs. If anything its more true now than it was. Have you checked your tune to see if there is something that would correspond to those spots?
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 07:09 PM   #80
mudferret
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 240688
Join Date: Mar 2010
Chapter/Region: W. Canada
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Vehicle:
06 WRX

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbarnhill View Post
the smoothing method has changed but it didnt affect the center of the run it just affects the end of the runs. If anything its more true now than it was. Have you checked your tune to see if there is something that would correspond to those spots?
Nothing shows up with other logs or on the dyno. Just made me curious since the same log looks different between the two versions that I posted above.
mudferret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 07:50 PM   #81
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

its probably actually supposed to be there but the error in the last edition probably masked that on the graph. It was a small error but it could have drastic effects on your graph in certain circumstances. It was one of those 'every now and then' bugs.
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 10:54 AM   #82
wgr73
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 232458
Join Date: Dec 2009
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: Las Cruces, El Paso
Vehicle:
2008 STi (OBP)
CAMTuning.com

Default

Just wanted to comment on this.

We used this program (made sure all setting were correct), Low boost tune said 420whp, took it to a dynojet on the same tank, and it put down 424whp!!

This is a great tool, pretty accurate if you ask me!
wgr73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 02:01 PM   #83
Evo_Kid
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 100218
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chico, CA
Vehicle:
04 AW STI
04 WW EVO 8 RS

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wgr73 View Post
Just wanted to comment on this.

We used this program (made sure all setting were correct), Low boost tune said 420whp, took it to a dynojet on the same tank, and it put down 424whp!!

This is a great tool, pretty accurate if you ask me!
Glad to hear that.
Evo_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 10:34 PM   #84
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

Yeah glad to hear that man. It has taken a lot of time and a lot of work to get this app to this point. Im just glad people are using it and still are excited about it like that. I get that sense of satisfaction when people make comments like that too Lets me know VD is on the right track.
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2011, 08:52 AM   #85
wgr73
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 232458
Join Date: Dec 2009
Chapter/Region: SWIC
Location: Las Cruces, El Paso
Vehicle:
2008 STi (OBP)
CAMTuning.com

Default

Awesome, yes it's a great tool!
wgr73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2011, 10:38 PM   #86
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

OK OK OK ... Im getting a ton of logs as error reports and I look in there and the only thing wrong is that people aren't logging TPS. If you don't log TPS it will throw an error (E101). You have been warned
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2011, 10:53 PM   #87
xluben
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 261612
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Vehicle:
2012 Forester 2.5X
2002 WRX Sedan

Default

Are you getting them from me? I tried loading a few today that didn't have TPS and it tries to send the error report and then locks up the program. I'm not a fan of that feature...
xluben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2011, 11:33 PM   #88
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

what were the names of the logs? I got rid of about 6 that were named similarly You know you can tell it NO when it asks if you want to send one. hahaha
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2011, 05:19 PM   #89
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

OK ok ok ... Im getting a lot of logs that are missing TPS columns reported as errors. Its not an error. Its missing a vital column. You need to have RPM, TPS and TIME recorded to use Virtual Dyno.

Just another reminder. I will be changing the code to report errors and let you know what columns you are missing and so you can see when its missing a particular column.

Thanks,
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2011, 01:46 AM   #90
petedotuk
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 176029
Join Date: Mar 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wgr73 View Post
Just wanted to comment on this.

We used this program (made sure all setting were correct), Low boost tune said 420whp, took it to a dynojet on the same tank, and it put down 424whp!!

This is a great tool, pretty accurate if you ask me!
I'm liking this programme also, out of curiosity, are the two graphs close or are they just close max figures?
petedotuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 10:54 AM   #91
V8 GTFO Lesbic WGN
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 191212
Join Date: Oct 2008
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Nashboringville
Vehicle:
2007 FXT-5MT E85 20G
TD06SL2 TurboTektuning

Default

This app is just amazing, very user friendly even for a first time logger, results +/-3 whp vs old Mustang Dyno.

I love this thing, thank you Sir. Resubscribed.
V8 GTFO Lesbic WGN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 06:35 AM   #92
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

Dang!!! Im loving this feedback Sorry I havent gotten some of the logs sent in fixed but Im about to leave for another 14 at the hospital.
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 08:54 PM   #93
Boosted Tuning
Former Vendor
 
Member#: 286950
Join Date: Jun 2011
Chapter/Region: BAIC
Location: Chico, CA (boostedtuning.com)
Vehicle:
335i / WRX
EVO 8 RS

Default

Subscribed
Boosted Tuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2011, 11:02 PM   #94
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

Thanks for the warning
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2011, 01:42 PM   #95
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

Hum ... what if we could graph any column along side HP and TQ ... just wondering what you all thought?
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2011, 05:49 PM   #96
V8 GTFO Lesbic WGN
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 191212
Join Date: Oct 2008
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Nashboringville
Vehicle:
2007 FXT-5MT E85 20G
TD06SL2 TurboTektuning

Default

??? what?
V8 GTFO Lesbic WGN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2011, 06:28 PM   #97
Boosted Tuning
Former Vendor
 
Member#: 286950
Join Date: Jun 2011
Chapter/Region: BAIC
Location: Chico, CA (boostedtuning.com)
Vehicle:
335i / WRX
EVO 8 RS

Default

lol, only time will tell...
Boosted Tuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2011, 06:37 PM   #98
mudferret
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 240688
Join Date: Mar 2010
Chapter/Region: W. Canada
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Vehicle:
06 WRX

Default

I think he's saying plotting boost (etc...) on the same graph as hp and tq rather than in the separate graph below?
mudferret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2011, 06:51 PM   #99
V8 GTFO Lesbic WGN
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 191212
Join Date: Oct 2008
Chapter/Region: South East
Location: Nashboringville
Vehicle:
2007 FXT-5MT E85 20G
TD06SL2 TurboTektuning

Default

Ahh ok, then yes would be nice to see boost
V8 GTFO Lesbic WGN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2011, 10:41 PM   #100
bbarnhill
Scooby Newbie
 
Member#: 256281
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, KS
Vehicle:
2007 Shelby GT 500
Grey

Default

no thats not it ... what if you could graph knocksum, timing ... whatever else.
bbarnhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Log analyzer - check it out jmc9809 Engine Management & Tuning 42 11-04-2007 09:00 AM
New Log-Analyzer program comming soon! NavyBlueSubaru Engine Management & Tuning 69 03-24-2007 03:17 PM
U-LAME -- UTEC Log Analyzer and Map Editor WolfDrive Engine Management & Tuning 14 12-05-2005 11:01 PM
UTECA (new log analyzer software)... need beta testers WolfDrive Engine Management & Tuning 10 05-31-2005 02:42 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.