|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|||||||




![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 332787
Join Date: Sep 2012
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Glendale, CA
Vehicle:2002 WRX Wagon Black |
Hey all I'm new to the forums, located in SoCal. I'm actually posting this because I wasn't allowed to post in the classifieds yet... anywho, I'm very much considering making the switch from my '01 BMW 330Ci to an '02+ Impreza or 05+ Legacy. I'm trying to straight up trade so I don't think I'll be able to swing the Legacy but I've seen bugeyes for around what my current car is worth.
The reason I'm trying to trade my Bimmer is because I'm a Snowboarder and I can't take it in snow, since it's a FR car. (If you're interested there will be an ad in the classifieds coming soon). Anything I should know about the GD (I think that's the right model) Imprezas? They seem to be ideal for what I want. Something very practical for snow, yet sporty and fun to drive. Any input (also anything on GC models and the 05+ Legacy) is appreciated. Thanks!
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 110783
Join Date: Mar 2006
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Bethel, CT
Vehicle:2010 WRX Satin White Pearl |
When you say Impreza, do you mean Impreza or Impreza WRX?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 332787
Join Date: Sep 2012
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Glendale, CA
Vehicle:2002 WRX Wagon Black |
I wouldn't mind an 2.5RS, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't want a WRX. My only previous experience was driving my buddies '02 WRX, but it was auto...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 296602
Join Date: Oct 2011
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Maine
Vehicle:2012 WRX Limited Satin White Pearl |
I changed from my 2006 BMW 325XI... I will say that my subaru doesn't sound as 'well built' and isn't as comfortable but... I had to come back to Subaru!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 110783
Join Date: Mar 2006
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Bethel, CT
Vehicle:2010 WRX Satin White Pearl |
Well, since you're asking a really broad question, start reading the WikiPedia pages for the Impreza, WRX and Legacy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 332787
Join Date: Sep 2012
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Glendale, CA
Vehicle:2002 WRX Wagon Black |
Quote:
@SWP n Gold. Basically what I was wondering was if there were any common (expensive) problems... like "Oh, you're getting a an '02 WRX? Okay... but you should know that _____". For example, when I was getting my 330Ci, I got a 5-speed because the Auto trannys on the E46's have had a lot of problems, some of them not being able to go into reverse, some of them failing completely. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 251257
Join Date: Jul 2010
Chapter/Region:
International
Location: Lew Krew
Vehicle:04 Maxima Champaign like da cristal |
Cheaper to have a subaru.... lmao !!!!!! thats funny.
CHEAP ??? what is this mythical thing called cheap??? the 2013 subaru impreza is cheap on gas, insurance, maintenance. 2004 subaru impreza WRX and/or STi are not cheap on gas, insurance maintenance, and parts, AND TUNE!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
NASIOC Supporter
Member#: 288093
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Colorado
Vehicle:2002 Bugeye PSM and parking lot scars |
If you are going to keep it stock, stay out of boost and do you own maintenance, I guess it could be cheap, maybe...
If I had it to do over again, knowing what I know now, I would have gotten an RS and modified that. At this point I have mostly Sti and aftermarket in the WRX anyway. I could have been in the same spot starting from a less expensive NA model and would have lesser insurance premiums. If I could ignore the urge to turn a wrench, I would pickup an Sti and leave it alone for resale's sake. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 276425
Join Date: Mar 2011
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Subarus are infinitely cheaper to maintain than Euro cars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 136314
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: A$$achusetts
Vehicle:2014 Grand Cherokee |
I'd be all over a 135 if BMW made it AWD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 296602
Join Date: Oct 2011
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Maine
Vehicle:2012 WRX Limited Satin White Pearl |
Quote:
Hope this helps. EDIT: Insurance was not cheaper for me (in my case), gas was a little better on the MPG's but nothing significant, general maintenance is much more affordable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 110783
Join Date: Mar 2006
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Bethel, CT
Vehicle:2010 WRX Satin White Pearl |
02-03 were arguably the most reliable years for the WRX since they don't have the horribly lean tune that started coming on these cars in 2004. The only problem is that they're 10 years old now and most of them have been beaten on.
Last edited by SWP n Gold; 09-21-2012 at 12:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 134005
Join Date: Dec 2006
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle:2004 WRX Premium PSM |
I'd say go with it if you're into snowboarding... AWD for snow is great. It's comfortable to live with in day to day life for sure... especially if you get the interior of a WRX. I came from a '98 Outback to a WRX is the interior is amazing (haha). I could see someone coming from a BMW to a WRX looking down on it though.
WRXs are not cheap on gas.. that's my only complaint. I get 20-22 MPG all city on 93 oct. Doing a highway run with some spirited driving in there (minor), I netted 24. So meh.. not the greatest. Tradeoffs for the AWD and boxer engine. Other than that, it's great. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 118209
Join Date: Jun 2006
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: North Dakota
Vehicle:2002 WRX Sedan |
Quote:
02/03's tended to have trans that got a bad reputation, but as you mention, they probably have been beaten on. (hence, the bad rep) To the OP... You are looking at used car that, statistically speaking, was driven hard by a younger person, and probably not maintained as well as it could have been. (again, stats...) Look for signs that it was owned by someone older, and hasn't been modded in any way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 110783
Join Date: Mar 2006
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Bethel, CT
Vehicle:2010 WRX Satin White Pearl |
I was referring to the engine, but yeah the transmissions were weaker. Not to mention, I think when the WRX first came out, people were just launching them like crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 332787
Join Date: Sep 2012
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Glendale, CA
Vehicle:2002 WRX Wagon Black |
Quote:
Yeah I'd probably not be looking to buy from a younger driver and would be looking for mostly, if not all stock. Not that all younger drivers drive hard, but like you said, statistically speaking. And guys: SWP n Gold, WRX Junky, BeefCurtains64, 10MTN-Bugeye, rob1n1, WRXLTD, cmiovino, rkramer. Thanks all, I really appreciate the input! PS: My ad is now up in the classifieds if anyone's interested. http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=2410272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 110783
Join Date: Mar 2006
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: Bethel, CT
Vehicle:2010 WRX Satin White Pearl |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 118209
Join Date: Jun 2006
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: North Dakota
Vehicle:2002 WRX Sedan |
The manuals tended to be rock solid. They were arguably built better, but also lived in vehicles that were not abused as much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 296602
Join Date: Oct 2011
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Maine
Vehicle:2012 WRX Limited Satin White Pearl |
No problem... Best of luck to you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 332901
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Vehicle:05 WRX STi silver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 322035
Join Date: Jun 2012
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Concord, CA
Vehicle:2003 16g Wrx Sedan Sonic Yellow |
I have a bugeye and I love it! sucks we have a cap around 350whp though cause of the tranny
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 97135
Join Date: Sep 2005
Chapter/Region:
NWIC
Location: Bothell
|
Quote:
And this is very debatable. I personally know people with 400+ hp gt30/35 builds on the stock 5 speed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 332787
Join Date: Sep 2012
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Glendale, CA
Vehicle:2002 WRX Wagon Black |
Yeah man, I've seen some videos on YouTube of bimmers rolling backwards down a hill while in gear. Plus, mine (like most of them) is FR so I'd just be asking to spin out. And I'm originally from Hawaii, so I've driven in snow... never haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 332787
Join Date: Sep 2012
Chapter/Region:
SCIC
Location: Glendale, CA
Vehicle:2002 WRX Wagon Black |
If anyone's still monitoring this thread, I'm noticing that a few of the bugeyes that I've come across have engine rebuilds. Is this something that I should consider a red flag? This is the link to one of the subies I was considering. It's around my car's value and he/she is open to trade. Any input, as always, is appreciated.
http://inlandempire.craigslist.org/cto/3296844803.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Scooby Newbie
Member#: 318142
Join Date: Apr 2012
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Georgia
Vehicle:2012 WRX SWP |
BMW's are horrible cars in the long run, every person i know that has owned one has had numerous issues with it after 60k miles. If you plan on keeping your Subaru stock it should be pretty problem free, risk always comes with modification so take it FWIW.
|
|
|
|