Welcome to the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Wednesday April 16, 2014
Home Forums WikiNASIOC Products Store Modifications Upgrade Garage
NASIOC
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Home Registration is free! Visit the NASIOC Store NASIOC Rules Search Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Calendar Archive NASIOC Upgrade Garage Logout
Go Back   NASIOC > NASIOC General > News & Rumors > Non-Subaru News & Rumors

Welcome to NASIOC - The world's largest online community for Subaru enthusiasts!
Welcome to the NASIOC.com Subaru forum.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, free of charge, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2013, 04:41 PM   #1
A W
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 265433
Join Date: Nov 2010
Default Automakers lobby to harmonize US-EU safety regulations

http://www.autoblog.com/2013/12/22/a...y-regulations/

I bolded the most important part for WRXHillbillyClimb.

Quote:
The 28-member European Union and the United States are currently negotiating a free trade agreement that, if successfully concluded, would rewrite the rules of international exchange for 46 percent of global trade. The magnitude of the potential deal means just about everyone is trying to influence parts of the deal, from the Sierra Club and almost 200 other organizations fighting the investor-state dispute clause to automakers aiming to get negotiators to harmonize US and EU safety regulations.

Carmakers aren't asking for total equivalency in US and EU standards. But, according to a report in Automotive News, automakers, who claim to be ten percent of trans-Atlantic trade, say that a common standard for just the fundamental safety issues would save them hundreds of millions of dollars in re-engineering costs for global platforms. Trying to succeed where they failed in the late nineties with the same push, this time the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the American Automotive Policy Council and the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association have asked scholars from the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute and the SAFER research group of Sweden's Chalmers University to work on a framework of basic safety standards.

The challenges are that "a mile driven [in the US] is different than a mile driven in Europe," and they'll need to figure out how to account for those differences when determining what 'fundamental' safety is. As well, even if the academic paperwork looks good, policymakers are wary of accepting rules for their own domestic markets that are made elsewhere and don't want to be seen as giving in to weaker standards. On the other hand, the chance of smaller victories means we could get access to Euro-approved tech like Audi's LED Matrix Beam headlights and sequential LED turn signals.

The university researchers are scheduled to have their findings ready by May, with a final analysis due at the end of 2014.
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
A W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2013, 02:33 PM   #2
Masterauto
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 198376
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Delaware
Vehicle:
X5D Subaru BRZ
Nissan GT-R

Default

Safety and environmental rules and restrictions are also trade barriers to prevent cars with price disparity from crossing borders as they did in 80s. Mercedes Benz lobbied very strongly and successfully ended a grey market of low cost German cars to USA.
Domestics got a bad surprise earlier when Japanese cars could pass environmental rules easily that domestics could not. Wonder why you don't see very desirable autos from other countries? It's not the shipping cost.
Masterauto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2013, 07:49 PM   #3
OrbitalEllipses
Scooby Guru
 
Member#: 178811
Join Date: Apr 2008
Chapter/Region: MAIC
Location: MoCo
Vehicle:
2013 WRB BRZ
:banana:

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Masterauto View Post
Wonder why you don't see very desirable autos from other countries? It's not the shipping cost.
De facto ban...
OrbitalEllipses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2013, 11:49 AM   #4
unclemat
Scooby Specialist
 
Member#: 114530
Join Date: May 2006
Chapter/Region: NESIC
Location: MA
Vehicle:
2005 LGT 6MT wagon

Default

These (Audi) sequential turn signals are ridiculous and harder to notice. I see similarly gimmicky sequential turn signals on Mustangs sometimes (stock?), and I believe some retro 60s cars had them. I am surprised such a BS is allowed under ECE regulations.
unclemat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - 2014, North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club, Inc.