|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
|||||||




![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 25577
Join Date: Oct 2002
Chapter/Region:
NESIC
Location: Hooksett, NH, USA
Vehicle:2004 TS Wagon |
I was thinking about my new Ganzflow...curious if there were any before/after dyno results out there...reason being is that sometimes my butt dyno says "oooh, i likey", and other times my car feels slower than before I installed it...
But then I got to thinking, at least with ram air, there's no way you can replicate the benefits of a ram air setup whilest sitting motionless on a dyno, right? Can you see the ACTUAL gain from an intake when there's no air moving around the car/engine bay? So here are my questions: Are there any legit ganzflow dyno plots? Is it possible that I feel slower after this mod? Can you get a legitimate dyno reading from just adding an intake?
* Registered users of the site do not see these ads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 8257
Join Date: Jul 2001
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Washington & Frederick CO. MD
Vehicle:2004 STI Silver\Silver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
NASIOC Supporter
Member#: 17187
Join Date: Apr 2002
Chapter/Region:
BAIC
Location: Fresno, CA
Vehicle:2009 Braun Entervan Gimpy White |
Now let me get this straight...are those "whp" or just overall hp numbers?..If that is whp numbers...holy cow!
edit...It was my understanding, and correct me if I am wrong, that there is quite a bit a hp loss from the crank to the wheels? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
NASIOC Supporter
Member#: 232
Join Date: Sep 1999
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Vehicle:99 RS-T RIP 02 Forster-S |
those are "corrected" numbers. Generally accepted stock 2.5RS awhp is 120-125 hp. There is NO WAY IN HELL that an intake alone did that. Even cammed, headered, pullied, ProECMed, intaked, etc I didn't make that much hp (made more torque though).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Scooby Guru
Member#: 4418
Join Date: Feb 2001
Chapter/Region:
South East
Location: Woodstock, Georgia
Vehicle:2008 S2000 Black |
Quote:
.-justin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 32617
Join Date: Feb 2003
Chapter/Region:
Tri-State
Location: NY
Vehicle:2008 STi DGM |
yeah, subbies have about 25% drivetrain loss, but those numbers in that dyno look about right, he's got mrt headerback and a ud pulley along with the intake
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
NASIOC Supporter
Member#: 232
Join Date: Sep 1999
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Vehicle:99 RS-T RIP 02 Forster-S |
Here we go again. Blindeye_03, you're absolutely correct however this particular post didn't include any info on a baseline RS run on the same dyno. Dynojets read high, especially when not configured correctly. W/o baseline info like a bone stock rs, or the calibration info (since this is NOT a subaru tuner) seems questionable at best. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Scooby Specialist
Member#: 8257
Join Date: Jul 2001
Chapter/Region:
MAIC
Location: Washington & Frederick CO. MD
Vehicle:2004 STI Silver\Silver |
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...ghlight=intake with a baseline run on the same day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
NASIOC Supporter
Member#: 232
Join Date: Sep 1999
Chapter/Region:
MWSOC
Location: Ft Wayne, IN
Vehicle:99 RS-T RIP 02 Forster-S |
That was from a Mustang Dyno (and there are no graphs in that post)... the previous "results" are from a Dynojet. Granted dynojets read high but come on, 30+ awhp from bolt ons, I want to live in that world
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ebay Intake vs Stock Intake Dyno Results | Kevin Thomas | Normally Aspirated Powertrain | 132 | 04-27-2010 02:42 AM |
| Perrin Short Ram Intake Road Dyno Results | supermarkus | Car Part Reviews | 15 | 05-01-2003 11:47 AM |
| any dyno result for intake | rex_area | Bay Area Impreza Club Forum -- BAIC | 4 | 04-26-2002 07:14 PM |